I think this is the holdout.
The plot of “12 Incompetent Jurors” in real-time, complete with confession, mountain of evidence and irrationality.
Except that was a play, a comedy, and the worst of the crime was catnapping.
Oh, for Pete’s sake...fry the bitch.
If Defense is trying to get rid of the holdout, does that mean that 11 want to let her walk and only one juror thinks she’s guilty?
It’s time to admit that the 19th Amendment was a mistake.
L
Wanna bet the one holdout is one of the guys?
Is the one saying guilty or not guilty?
no doubt she knew exactly what she was doing
Massachusetts a L state bet she gets off the hook.
So 11 want to let her walk and one is holding his ground. And, yeah, I assume its a HIM.
those 11 jurors are a disgrace
If this trial was here she more than likely woulda been convicted in one day.....or less even.
A hung jury is not unusual but this judge acts as though intimidation of a juror is the way to keep this from happening.
This judge needs to be removed and a mistrial needs to happen this morning.
They legal system there in Mass is joke. If I were that one juror, I would sue the bastards.
Apparently we really did not need a jury trial here because the jurors didn’t realize that the judge made the decision for them during jury instructions. It was all a sham from the start to get this woman off for killing her kids.
This raises the question: How does this defense attorney know how that one juror is voting. Jury deliberations are supposed to be secret. Is someone on the jury in contact with the defense ? No defense attorney would risk removing a holdout juror in a capital murder case unless he knew which way that juror was voting.
“Instead, Reddington argues that postpartum psychosis and the effects of medication left her unable to understand the wrongfulness of her actions.”
Are alcoholics excused for murder? I think that would be a relevant precedent.
Because one juror believes reasonable doubt has not been established does not mean that juror is wrong. Nor does it mean that the foreman’s contention that one juror is not following the law is correct.
I know of times when a jury will deliver a verdict that disregards the facts just because they want to be finished and go home.
Apparently, one man is all that is stopping this evil bitch from getting off.
Women should not be allowed on juries either. Remove the 19th Amendment.
Just to put it in perspective, a man strangled his 5 children in the basement in 2014 (what is it about basements?). It took the jury 2 hours to convict and he received the death penalty. No men stood outside the courtroom and bawled their eye out for him.
I think this is the holdout.
This woman should get the chair.
It might be 11 members leaning too much into reasonable doubt on certain counts and one member saying...”I have no doubts, the defendent is guilty and should not even be breathing!”