I read at another source that the guy she killed was 20.
I assumed this would be disclosed somewhere in the article, hence the murder charge.
A jury might refuse to find her guilty, but it would be a gamble.
Somebody has to run order in the ‘hood if there will be progress to bring sustainability to get to a just society.
I, for one, believe her.
This can’t be the whole story. Marching out of the house? Shot in the back of the head? This is an outline of an event. Not the whole story.
Teen girls have been sneaking men into their houses as long as there have been teen girls, men and houses.
A 13 year old invites a 20 year old into their home and has him in her bedroom?...
Absolutely nothing else to say on this...
Next...
Inside the house clean shoot all the way. Following him outside and shooting him there she should be looking for a temporary insanity plea or a good deal from the prosecutor on a lesser charge.
I reckon there’s more to this story.
I’m torn between a momma protecting her 13 year old against a 20 year old man and a 13 year old that invites a 20 year old man into her bedroom.
I’m siding with momma bear, based on the information available.
I applaud her.
Shooting him from behind aafter he had left the dwelling was understandable but not the best choice.
Gary Plauche
Temporary insanity. Not guilty.
I was 100% on the side of the mom. Then I read that she shot the man after he had left the house.
She’ll need a good lawyer here.
You can have sympathy for the mother here, but shooting him in the back of the head when he was already out of the house was a bad idea.
Rodderius be Deadius.
Her daughter invited him in. He didn’t break in. When she demanded he leave it appears that he complied. Shooting him in back, and outside of her home, doesn’t look good either.
Not guilty.
13? is that old enough to give consent for a 20 year old to be over? the guy was still a predator even if she allowed him over.
I know people do it, but evidently 13 is not old enough (or wise enough) to leave some teens home alone.