A jury might refuse to find her guilty, but it would be a gamble.
The story says she shot him after he was out of the house. That make it tough on her. If he’s in the house that’s one thing, but if he’s fleeing the scene and is already outside the house, ouch.
The jury will be made up of mostly black women, half of whom will be thinking, "That could've been my daughter" and the other half thinking, "That could've been my son."
So yeah, it's a gamble.
The only reason it would be a gamble is because she is black. I think if a white father had done it, there wouldn't even have been an arrest.
The fact that the child invited him in is no excuse. The man should have known she was underage, and if not, should have asked her to make sure.
A child is not old enough to smoke, drink or sign a contract. A child is protected statutorily even if engaging in consensual sex. (The only exception to this age-old rule seems to be transgenderism, under the evil lie that it is "healthcare".)
I’d roll the dice on that case unless the prosecutor offered a reasonable deal. Bad optics letting him get out the door before shooting him in the back. Easy win if she had shot him while he was under the bed.
The daughter is likely about to discover the joys of foster care if she doesn’t clarify her story.