Skip to comments.
AR-15 Manufacturer Will Only Sell to Law Enforcement That Refuse to Enforce ‘Unconstitutional Restrictions’
Breitbart ^
Posted on 07/14/2026 8:10:30 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe
Missouri-based AR-15 manufacturer CMMG put law enforcement on notice in states that ban guns, making clear the company will only sell to them if they make “public and written statements” refusing to enforce “unconstitutional restrictions.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: banglist
Should have been the general policy among the manufacturers since at least 35 years ago.
To: Tench_Coxe
I got halfway through the title and started to get upset, then I read the rest and smiled. :)
2
posted on
07/14/2026 8:14:16 AM PDT
by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: Tench_Coxe
3
posted on
07/14/2026 8:15:45 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Tench_Coxe
Like Randy Barrett did to California
Nice
L
4
posted on
07/14/2026 8:16:57 AM PDT
by
Lurker
( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is. LOL l)
To: Tench_Coxe
Such a statement would be unenforceable.
They should just not sell to states w/unconstitutional laws. Let their police be as unarmed as they want the public to be.
5
posted on
07/14/2026 8:18:06 AM PDT
by
fruser1
To: Tench_Coxe
Yep, a shame that all manufactures haven’t adopted similar policies.
6
posted on
07/14/2026 8:18:55 AM PDT
by
nuke_road_warrior
(Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 39 years.)
To: fruser1
They should just not sell to states w/unconstitutional laws. Let their police be as unarmed as they want the public to be. I'd think it's pretty hard to get competing manufacturers to ignore a customer the size of the State of California.
7
posted on
07/14/2026 8:20:26 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
To: Carry_Okie
8
posted on
07/14/2026 8:40:02 AM PDT
by
Segovia
(https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2025/07/06/fossil-fooled-lives-vs-lies-n2659950)
To: Tench_Coxe
Good for them. I can’t even own my .54 caliber flintlock rifle in California because it might shoot down an airplane, right Arnold?
9
posted on
07/14/2026 8:45:33 AM PDT
by
kawhill
(Dywedwch Wrthbym because + Add translation Welsh-English dictionary 'Tell Us')
To: Tench_Coxe
10
posted on
07/14/2026 8:51:05 AM PDT
by
P8riot
(You will never know Jesus Christ as a reality in your life until you know Him as a necessity.)
To: Tench_Coxe
To: kawhill
Good for them. I can’t even own my .54 caliber flintlock rifle in California because it might shoot down an airplane, right Arnold?Funny but not true, I own a .62 caliber flintlock smoothbore musket in California perfectly legally.
To: Tench_Coxe
the first lower i acquired was a CMMG then went cheaper after that one..
13
posted on
07/14/2026 10:14:04 AM PDT
by
ßuddaßudd
((>> ☼ << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
To: Inyo-Mono
Thanks for the info. I thought they banned everything .50 caliber and above, even black powder flintlocks.
14
posted on
07/14/2026 10:34:55 AM PDT
by
kawhill
(Dywedwch Wrthbym because + Add translation Welsh-English dictionary 'Tell Us')
To: All
I bet they read FR: Many here have been suggesting this sort of thing for years.
Good for them.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson