Posted on 06/20/2026 2:08:58 PM PDT by Red Badger
How did we get to a place in this country where we’ve decided that the humane approach to severe mental illness is to just leave people alone and let them fend for themselves?
If someone is living on a sidewalk, talking to invisible people, wandering through traffic, or spiraling deeper into psychosis, government intervention is now treated like the “evil” thing to do. Activists, disability-rights groups, and this massive network of NGOs have spent decades arguing mental institutions should be used only in the rarest circumstances.
And the results of that disastrous agenda speak for themselves.
Cities all over America are drowning in homelessness, tent cities, violence, addiction, untreated mental illness, and public chaos. All while billions of taxpayer dollars flood into programs that “manage” the crisis rather than solve it.
It’s one big giant grift.
But help is on the way.
It appears the Trump administration is ready to challenge one of the legal foundations behind this scam system.
In a new memorandum, the DOJ claims that federal disability laws have been stretched way beyond what Congress intended, and this is creating restrictions that make it harder for states to step in and help when people are suffering with severe mental illness.
If that argument holds, it could be one of the biggest shifts in mental health policy in decades.
Devon Kurtz:
Today, DOJ broke with 35 years of bad law.
Regarding the integration mandates of section 504 and Title II of the ADA, “the regulations are unlawful.”
This is a shot across the bow for Olmstead and P&A groups that have weaponized it against state programs for the mentally ill.
So, activist groups and regulators are using disability laws to block states from giving needy people treatment so they can keep their grift going.
This is a battle to allow states to implement safety and treatment. It’s also a battle to end this vicious, heartless scam.
Joe Lonsdale:
For decades, the fed govt has been more focused on a psychotic person’s “right” to die on the street than a state’s right to intervene and help them get care. Now, the Trump DOJ is signaling that it will end DC’s incursion on psychiatric care, and let states decide what best helps their people. This is a disaster for the corrupt NGO-grift complex that feeds off permanent misery; it’s great for people in need of help, and those who want safe cities.
Meanwhile, the left is terrified that the mental illness situation could be solved. Left-wing publications like Mother Jones are sounding the alarm bells.
Mother Jones:
On Thursday, the Department of Justice quietly released a memo pertaining to the landmark 1999 disability civil rights case Olmstead v. L.C., which curtailed states’ power to institutionalize people diagnosed with mental illnesses, and related federal civil rights laws. That precedent, the Trump administration memo argues—in conjunction with federal civil rights and disability rights statutes—increases homelessness, a claim that likely signals a push to expand institutionalization in restrictive psychiatric facilities.
The administration’s claims, according to University of Michigan law professor Sam Bagenstos, are not rooted in fact.
“It’s just absurd,” says Bagenstos, general counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Management and Budget during the Biden administration, calling the Olmstead decision “one of the most effective tools in combating homelessness” by encouraging states to augment mental health and housing services outside institutions.
More concerning is the fact that the White House instructed the Justice Department to produce the document, which Bagenstos says “suggests we might potentially be seeing an executive order” directing DOJ and the Department of Health and Human Services to roll back rules meant to avoid institutionalization. The memo, however, does not change laws itself.
“This administration is trying to take away one of the most fundamental rights that people with disabilities have fought for,” said George Washington University law professor Alison Barkoff.
In December, for instance, the Department of Justice reached an agreement with South Carolina to expand supportive services for people with psychiatric disabilities to reduce rates of institutionalization.
Mother Jones is acting like the real crisis is Trump trying to fix the system, not the fact that the system is clearly broken and human beings are suffering.
Americans can see what’s happening on the streets. They see people in obvious mental distress living on sidewalks, wandering through traffic, screaming in public, and cycling through the same failed NGO programs over and over again.
And that’s why the left is protecting it. They don’t want to lose their government money and their “mail-in” ballot scam.
Roy Rogue:
My jaw literally dropped listening to this
Homeless woman in Los Angeles says NGOs come to them and register them to vote 5 TIMES PER YEAR and pay them $25
Multiple people all confirm they register the homeless 4-5x A YEAR EACH and pay them
This is why Democrats made ballot harvesting by 3rd party networks in California legal
They are registering the homeless to vote 5x each, providing the fake name and address information, and then ballot harvesting hundreds of thousands of ballots
America can’t move forward and be great again while homeless and mentally ill people are being held hostage by left-wing NGOs that have no interest in solving the problem. It’s in their financial and political interest to keep the mentally ill in a state of perpetual crisis.
Let’s hope President Trump can pull off another win and reopen the mental institutions.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
There are no buildings to re-open.
“How did we get to a place in this country where we’ve decided that the humane approach to severe mental illness is to just leave people alone and let them fend for themselves?”
Because they can “vote” for Democrats.
We have desperately needed to reopen the mental institutions for decades. Society was much better/healthier when the mentally ill were institutionalized.
Many of them can be found in teaching positions within the public school system. Protected by the massively powerful teachers unions and state employee contracts. Which together make them almost completely fire-proof for their entire working lives.
Sometimes it's pretty obvious. I was waiting at a traffic light a while back and I watched this guy at a bus stop arguing with an invisible person. The argument escalated into a shouting match, until the guy started walking away. Apparently the invisible party said something really offensive at that point because the guy rushed back and dove over the bus stop bench to strangle the invisible person. After that the light changed and I didn't see how it all turned out.
That's because most of them are certifiable, and should be put in one.
State mental hospitals should HAVE NEVER BEEN CLOSED!!!!
If they did they wouldn’t be Democrats any more........
indeed.
how could’ve I overlooked that, it was obvious
thanks
I don’t know why leftists and wokesters are upset. It is like free housing for people like them.
We could call the Home for Trannies!
I'll never forget the time 20 years ago, when my wife and I stopped for lunch at a Mc Donalds in Minden, Nevada. After ordering inside, we turned to look at a man shouting to himself and wildly waving his arms around as he spun in circles. At first we thought he was a lunatic until I spotted the plastic earbud and long thin microphone protruding from it. First time we'd ever seen someone use a cell phone like that in public.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.