Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Billionaires Tax Qualifies for November Ballot
American Greatness ^ | 18 Jun, 2026 | AG News Staff

Posted on 06/18/2026 8:03:49 AM PDT by MtnClimber

A proposal to impose a one-time 5 percent tax on the assets of California billionaires has qualified for the November ballot.

The California Secretary of State’s office announced Wednesday that supporters had gathered enough signatures to place the measure before voters after months of maneuvering and opposition from influential political and business leaders.

The proposal, backed by a health care union, would levy a one-time tax on the assets of the state’s wealthiest residents.

Advocates of the measure claim the increase in revenue would help offset the effects of federal spending reductions and provide resources to prevent hospital closures and job losses. Among those backing the proposal is socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Opponents, including Newsom and several Silicon Valley business leaders, believe the tax would damage California’s business environment and encourage wealthy taxpayers to relocate, reducing state revenue in the long run.

The measure has split California’s Democratic coalition, creating divisions among labor groups and drawing significant financial involvement from technology executives and business organizations.

A prominent critic of the tax is Google co-founder Sergey Brin, who has joined other opponents in funding efforts aimed at countering the initiative and advancing alternative ballot measures.

Despite qualifying for the ballot, it may not end up with a vote.

Proponents retain the option of withdrawing the measure before a late June deadline as part of an agreement involving lawmakers and the governor. The billionaires tax is one of several competing tax-related proposals currently under discussion, including a separate union-backed tax extension, a business-supported effort to limit future tax increases and other initiatives backed by Brin and his allies.

Leaders of SEIU-UHW, the health care union sponsoring the proposal, have said they want voters to decide the issue. More recently, however, they have indicated a willingness to continue discussions as Newsom works to build opposition among labor and health care organizations.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: california; classwarfare; leftism; taxes; theft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: devane617

” don’t get it. Drive away the highest tax payers for a one time payment.”

It makes perfect sense if you understand that the Democrat party is not motivated by logic, but by envy.

Everything they say and do comes down to envy.


21 posted on 06/18/2026 8:48:25 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Men gave them the power to do this and men are at fault. Cucks galore.


22 posted on 06/18/2026 9:00:23 AM PDT by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

Valuable art.

Show us your Hunter Biden art.

It has appreciated, you know.


23 posted on 06/18/2026 9:00:36 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob ( My pronoun is EXIT. Generally full of /S -- Living with Havana Syndrome -infected from Main Stream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

First they came for the billionaires and I said nothing.

Then, they came for the millionaires. This is a huge chunk of people in the state becuase of property values.


24 posted on 06/18/2026 9:03:30 AM PDT by moviefan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

SEIU IS NOT A “HEALTH CARE UNION”-——

IT WAS STARTED AS A JANITORS UNION IN LOS ANGELES.


25 posted on 06/18/2026 9:12:59 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: devane617

It will never be a one time tax and everyone there knows it.


26 posted on 06/18/2026 9:57:56 AM PDT by packrat35 (“When discourse ends, violence begins.” – Charlie Kirk, and they killed him anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Letting women vote will be the ruin of America.


27 posted on 06/18/2026 9:58:27 AM PDT by packrat35 (“When discourse ends, violence begins.” – Charlie Kirk, and they killed him anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

California, the new East Germany.


28 posted on 06/18/2026 10:09:56 AM PDT by Karliner (Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

If a union is sponsoring the measure, then it doesn’t take genius to know where the money will go, aside from a certain politician or two. Voters are again being sold a pig in a poke.


29 posted on 06/18/2026 10:45:03 AM PDT by DPMD (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

Exactly. 20 years times 5% means there will be nothing left to plunder.


30 posted on 06/18/2026 10:59:38 AM PDT by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

And it won’t always be a tax on billionaires either.


31 posted on 06/18/2026 11:04:22 AM PDT by Antihero101607
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

This is an IQ test (Like Prop50). If you think the commie trash in power will not immediately expand this to everyone with more money than they like for the rest of time — you are too stupid to live.


32 posted on 06/18/2026 11:14:13 AM PDT by bobbo666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The Historical Rule: For decades, Indiana law granted assessing officials the authority to enter and examine buildings to gather necessary data for accurate property valuations.

Califoenia haven’t seen that yet?.


33 posted on 06/18/2026 12:26:03 PM PDT by Vaduz (NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

Not to mention much of their assets are held in trusts and LLC’s.

They don’t own anything but, they control it....

And if they held offshore then those countries simply don’t recognize American courts....


34 posted on 06/18/2026 12:35:57 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

Imagine the endless litigation.

It will be the tax attorneys’ heaven on earth.


35 posted on 06/18/2026 1:32:16 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The lawyer who structured Ilhan Omar’s sudden decline in assets from $30 million to $30 thousand is going to be on every rich California’s speed dial.


36 posted on 06/18/2026 8:32:53 PM PDT by Tellurian (Any cleverness from a DemonicRat is quickly invested in deception. Ds are world class deceivers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson