Posted on 05/31/2026 12:40:56 AM PDT by MarlonRando
Between the falling birth rates, chain migration, anchor babies, and the planned demographic changes by our social engineers, non-whites will be the majority by 2050 or sooner if Democrats get back into office. They would open the borders again. There is no reason to think otherwise. If you think they will be nice to white people, you are sadly mistaken.
For some reason, Democrats decided white people can’t have their own country. Possibly, it’s because they see them all as future Democrats they can manipulate due to their neediness.
(Excerpt) Read more at independentsentinel.com ...
The English consistently from Cromwell until the 1950s portrayed Irish people as “bad stock” to use your language.
They were portrayed as sub human apes in comparison to Anglo Saxons
Looks like you’re equivocating Dutch being displaced with whites today
I know you Cronos
Most are Catholic it’ll be fine just wait
Really
Well the why isn’t it fine where they came from where it’s Catholic too
Plus it was done here against our wishes. For votes and cheap labor
To us
And hey most dummies here have no clue this enforcement of this it’ll be ok logic on this very forum emanated from the very top here
“You’re a racist”
I heard it here from day one if I said I desired keeping America and the west majority white
(He knows he only has a short time, 7 years)
Yep
Oh and those middle eastern moon worshippers prove your nature over nurture statement wrong.
Those are descendants of the creators of civilisation: from Sumeruahs, Akkadiahs, Egyptians, Hebrews, Syruacs, Phoenicians etc.
What dumbed them down? Islam.
You can see the same thing among Punjabis: Punjabi Mohammedans have a lower IQ than Hindu, Sikh, Christian Punjabis despite sharing the same genes and language
hive societies can go on for centuries and ours not so much. But I would rather live in a nation of individuals, free-thinkers who burn the candle in a great flash and accomplish the impossible. My people were destined to be a spacefaring people.
Mexico city is one of the largest cities in the world. Is that a great accomplishment? No It is sh&$. It limps along. I wouldn’t want to ,” live” there. Surviving for thousands of years isn’t greatness. Greatness is greatness.
We aren’t breeding wth the “builders of civilization,” brother. The dregs of inbreeding, which is devastating to the workings of the genes and the brain are the folks who are flooding in.
We are in no danger of being blessed by the genes of Hassan or Omar.
And your claim “ If an individual with an IQ of 100 has a child with an individual with an IQ of 80, the child will statistically have an IQ of 90, creating a downward trend”
That is NOT how IQ works.
Because intelligence is heavily influenced by environmental factors and complex genetic combinations, children of parents with extreme traits (either exceptionally high or exceptionally low IQs) statistically tend to move back toward the population average (100), rather than splitting the difference precisely or continuing a downward trend.
Unlike simple physical traits in animals (like coat color), human intelligence is a highly complex polygenic trait influenced by thousands of genetic variants, each having a minuscule effect.
Also note that throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, average IQ scores rose worldwide by roughly 3 points per decade due to improvements in public health, better nutrition, and widespread formal education—proving that population intelligence is not a fixed, declining genetic pool.
It is just not as simple as you put it. Society and Culture matters as well as nutrition, rule of law, and genetics
As to “What person with an IQ of 120 is going to want to breed with an 80IQ caveman”
Well no one. The normal difference that make a couple work is about 10 to 20 IQ points with the mean being closer to 12.
A 49 IQ point difference cannot communicate even as acquaintances leave alone a couple.
I am not equivocating Dutch/Deutsch immigrants to the USA swiftly outnumbering the Anglo Saxon.
The point isn’t to equate different eras, but to look at how demographic shifts actually work.
Historically, when populations like the Dutch or Irish arrived in new regions, boundaries of who was considered part of the dominant culture shifted over time.
Today, the data shows that high assimilation and intermarriage rates among Hispanic immigrants are reshaping American demographics—meaning the future isn’t about one group replacing another, but about how the definition of the American mainstream continues to expand.
Do you deny that the WASOs in the early 1800s were not anxious in the same way about Dutch/Deutsch immigrants coming and “taking over their own country “?
no it’s not precise, the combining of genes, but it gives you a good mathematical representation to predict this or that with some accuracy. And then you have to factor in the studies that find that an offsprings intelligence are calculated at approximately 60% from the maternal dna. Which is a good reason for men to pick intelligent women as mates.
But certainly, you don’t play with fire and make horrible breeding choices.
Now as for nurture, good luck. Throw trillions into education, and give ,” opportunities,” and not much is going to happen. initially there might be an increase of a few points, but over time there is a regression to the mean.When it comes to brains, you either have them or you don’t. It’s hardware. It’s a product of the protein-coding wrapped into the DNA
Your response completely misses the point of historical precedent and relies on emotional deflections rather than historical or economic data.
You claim I’m ‘equivocating’ Dutch displacement with modern white demographics, but you are misunderstanding the historical comparison.
In the 1830s and 1840s, Anglo-Americans legitimately believed they were being ‘displaced’ culturally and politically by the influx of non-Anglo groups—specifically Germans and the Dutch.
In fact, Martin Van Buren (elected in 1836) was the first and only U.S. president whose first language was not English; he grew up speaking Dutch.
To the Anglo establishment of the time, having a non-English speaker in the White House felt exactly like a cultural ‘takeover.’
The point is that every generation of Americans fears they are being ‘displaced’ by the next wave of immigrants, only for those immigrants to assimilate.
You want to keep the West ‘majority white,’ but you are ignoring the fact that the definition of ‘white’ has continuously changed. Ben Franklin famously wrote essays complaining that German immigrants were ‘swarthy’ and would never adopt English customs. Later, the Irish, Italians, and Slavic peoples were legally and socially excluded from being considered truly ‘white’ or ‘American.’ Today, we view them all as the American mainstream
Im not anxious about any intelligent, hard-working White folks .” taking over” anything. I would welcome any infusion of good genes, helpful stock.
But that’s the point, you need a nation of people with shared bloodlines, a common history and goals-,and that was Europe until Ted kennedy worked the devil’s business.
Germans come in and “ take over.” Warner Von Braun the SS member took us to the moon. What a naughty boy he was
But there is no parallel universe where breeding with Aztecs, or chinamen or black africans leads to a hopeful future my brother. No timeline that leads to the stars. Only failure. A future of government cheese, vibrant street protests and distrust.
We were talking about China and you shifted to Mexico???
Those are different cultures. Chinese may be Confucian influenced but Mexico isn’t
And “my people were destined to be a space faring people “
You do realize that
1. Rockets exist because China invented gunpowder and rocketry in the 900s, right?
2. Germans were culturally different when Von Braun came over for rocket development?
Cuoture matters slightly more than genetics (note I’m nit saying genetics influence is zero, just that it is not paramount)
“Why increase the sons of Africa, by planting them in America, where we have so fair an opportunity, by excluding all blacks and tawnys, of increasing the lovely white and red?”— Ben Franklin
“I advanced it, therefore, as a suspicion only, that the blacks, whether originally a distinct race, or made distinct by time or circumstances, are inferior to the whites in the endowments of both body and mind.”- Thomas Jefferson
“There is a physical difference between the white and the black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together... while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any man am in favor having the superior position assigned to the white race.”- Abraham Lincoln
Have you been to the old city centre of Mexico?
I was there years ago in a two day trip. The historical city centre us quite beautiful.
It isn’t even a thousand years old though, I think it’s younger than oxford or Nalanda.
when a cell begins to divide in the womb, brother, culture doesn’t cause a brain cell to form, and for thousands of connections, dendrites, to reach out and bring order. It’s the proteins manufactured in the cells under the administration of the coding of DNA.
The brain is a machine, not a social construct. Culture can get in the way. White people, when left alone, can do great things. Genes. Genes. Genes.
the chinese used rockets as fireworks. We strapped guys into chairs onto the fireworks and then developed the orbital maneuvers to get them to the moon and back.
Yes, chinese can play Vivaldi on a violin like a robot.
You are missing the core point: that I wanted to show that the Punjabi example proves a clear victory of nurture over nature.
Punjabi Muslims, Hindus, and Sikhs share the exact same genetic ‘stock’ and DNA.
Yet, differences in average IQ and socioeconomic outcomes exist solely due to nurture—specifically, cultural practices around education, rural-urban infrastructure, and institutional investments.
If genetics were the deciding factor, these identical genetic populations would have identical test scores.
The variation proves that environment, culture, and education dictate cognitive outcomes, completely dismantling your argument about ‘dregs’ and ‘genes.’
There were some Adoption Studies (Schiff & Duyme) where children born to low-socioeconomic-status, lower-IQ biological parents who were adopted into high-socioeconomic-status families. When tested later in life, the adopted children showed an immediate increase of 12 to 15 IQ points compared to their biological siblings who remained in the lower-funded environment. Their genetics did not change; their access to nutrition, stable households, and complex language did.
Also look at https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/middle-eastern-or-north-african-us-government-surveys-preview-mena-demographics
Data shows that 52.4% to 53.2% of Middle Eastern immigrants hold a bachelor’s degree or higher, and 24% hold advanced postgraduate degrees. For comparison, only 35.9% of the native-born U.S. population holds a college degree
It’s culture.
The USA has a culture of success
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.