To: MtnClimber; SunkenCiv; rktman; mowowie; SuperLuminal; Cottonbay; telescope115; laplata; ...
2 posted on
05/21/2026 7:57:39 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
To: Red Badger
I have measured for framing up walls before,
and the numbers just didn’t add up...
3 posted on
05/21/2026 8:00:59 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
( I am obsessed with not being obsessed with anything.)
To: Red Badger
Space expanding into space? I should’ve been a biologist.
4 posted on
05/21/2026 8:01:56 PM PDT by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: Red Badger
Measure once, cut twice! Wait! Strike that.
5 posted on
05/21/2026 8:03:34 PM PDT by
TonyM
(Score Event)
To: Red Badger
6 posted on
05/21/2026 8:04:21 PM PDT by
Paladin2
( YMMV)
To: Red Badger
This stuff makes my eyes glaze over. To quote Hillary:
“What difference, at this point, does it make?” >> to anyone ever, in the further history of humanity?
Debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin at least makes some sense.
8 posted on
05/21/2026 8:06:55 PM PDT by
citizen
(All Bush-era RINOs have got to be primaried out.)
To: Red Badger
To observe the expansion of the Universe astronomers used the standard candle of a certain type of Supernova. By seeing how bright it was they could calculate how far away it was. There is a problem, however. As you look further away into the universe you are also looking back in time. If the universe was once a point that expanded it would be a smaller universe the further back you looked. However looking at something 2 billion light years away looks like it is on a sphere 2 billion light years in radius and looking back 4 billion years a sphere of 4 billion years in radius.
The further back you look the bigger the Universe seems when it is actually getting smaller the further back you look!
This not only magnifies objects the further back you look but makes them dimmer as well...giving the illusion they are further away than they are! Your standard candles become dimmer over time as a result making the universe look like it is expanding at a growing rate the further back you look!.
All this conjecture about an accelerating expansion is built on a faulty foundation!
10 posted on
05/21/2026 8:13:10 PM PDT by
Nateman
(Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
To: Red Badger
When it comes to big bang, it’s a bunch of BS. Can you imagine the force it would take to expand the universe as we now know it? We can monitor star systems over a billion light years away. There is no way in my opinion that one blast did that. OTOH, we can not understand infinity either, we can’t even explain why gravity even exist yet we know that it does.
15 posted on
05/21/2026 8:22:06 PM PDT by
eastforker
(All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
To: Red Badger
16 posted on
05/21/2026 8:24:16 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
( I am obsessed with not being obsessed with anything.)
To: Red Badger
Quite frankly, several decades ago, when I was still in my 60s, I began to find that playing 27-36 holes of golf was becoming, physically, more and more difficult...
With this very fine paper, I can now understand more clearly why it appeared that my stamina was failing...
Clearly, taking this, now, best value for the Hubble tension into account, each yard of our golf courses may have looked the same, but they were actually relatively longer and longer...
I just wish that I could have included this amazing result in one or more of my Phys Rev publications...
21 posted on
05/21/2026 8:31:18 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
To: Red Badger
I see the problem in their calcs. It's right there, plain as day. They hired the California High Speed Rail design team...and nothing lines up.

To: Red Badger
Finally answers! I lie awake at night agonizing over this.
You know what else doesn’t add up? Why this matters to anyone on the face of the earth and who is paying for this “research”?
25 posted on
05/21/2026 8:43:25 PM PDT by
chickenlips
(Neuter your politicians)
To: Red Badger
I think maybe they’re not compensating for the fractal incurvate.
29 posted on
05/21/2026 8:50:45 PM PDT by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: Red Badger
32 posted on
05/21/2026 9:04:45 PM PDT by
Buttons12
( )
To: Red Badger
"Scientists Just Measured How Fast The Universe Is Expanding. The Answer Doesn’t Add Up.
37 posted on
05/21/2026 9:54:58 PM PDT by
fidelis
(Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
To: Red Badger
I will now ask the question I asked my seventh grade teacher when she told us the universe was expanding: Exactly what is it expanding into?
I don’t want to hear anything about expanding cakes or crabs walking on the beach.
42 posted on
05/22/2026 3:55:04 AM PDT by
odawg
To: Red Badger
The more we know the more don’t know.... The big bang is theory to begin with because no one knows how the universe began.
43 posted on
05/22/2026 3:57:08 AM PDT by
maddog55
(The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it! I want lower taxes.)
To: Red Badger
By linking a dozen different cosmic distance measurement methods into a single “Distance Network,” they confirmed the universe is currently expanding at about 73.5 kilometers per second per 3.26 million light-years.I came up with 70.3 kilometers per 3.26 million light years. Man, I was way off!
To: Red Badger
Our universe is on a slide on a microscope and we are expanding until the alien scientist puts the slide on a window sill and we start to contract...
60 posted on
05/22/2026 11:39:21 PM PDT by
minnesota_bound
(Making money now. Still want much more.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson