Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 03/24/2026 11:31:25 AM PDT by simpson96
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said that a legal theory supported by the Republican National Committee in a case related to mail-in ballots “imperils a lot of different things.”
Jackson noted during oral arguments in the case on Monday that election practices have changed over time, which she said undermines the idea that there was ever a consistent practice across all states.
“It's been changing throughout the course in a way that undermines the notion that there was one consistent practice first of all, or that Congress's law, the meaning of Election Day in the federal statutes, somehow was tied to what the state's practices were about that,” Jackson said. “I mean, I think this is your original point that there were lots of different practices and so to the extent we're saying, ‘oh, you could only look at Election Day in the federal statute to mean exactly what the states were doing back at that time.’ This imperils a lot of different things, not just post-Election Day ballot deadlines.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Is she a biologist yet?
R-E-S-P-E-T-C
find out what it means to me.
😉
That clip is a real KEEPER!
Yes. She imperils a lot by being there. In many ways. She should go back to law school and study the US Constitution and Biology as well.
Thanks. You can download it if you click the 3 horizontal dots to the right of “Support, Save, Repost, Share, Edit”, which are under the video name and date.
Jackson has a total inability to reason and looks at things through feelings and wet noodle thinking
Ketanji, on the other hand...
How about what the Constitution says, dimwit?
The fatigue is real.
I think the above is correct, per your constitutional quotes
After every oral argument on any case of nationwide relevance, the leftist media quotes KBJ’s questions and statements. I’m not sure why since it usually just highlights her ignorance.
Her most repeated statement during arguments is “I don’t understand” or “I’m having a hard time understanding”.
We know. That’s the problem with her being on the court. She’s an idiot.
Hey Katanji, not all black people are as stupid as you. Most are quite capable of getting a photo ID.
BTW, how does she get past security when she gets to work?
Wow, could you imagine getting a job as a SCOTUS Clerk then finding out it’s for Jackson?
I’d be walking around wearing a T-Shirt that says “Don’t tell my mom I work for Ketanji Brown Jackson. She thinks I’m a piano player in a whorehouse.”
-PJ
Kamala lives on in Ketanji, the word saladmaster of the court.
And even less about The Constitution and legal matters!
I have more respect for my dog’s penis than I do that moron.
At least it knows what a beotch is and would probably make a better “judge” too....
That moron has no business being on SCOTUS whatsoever....
Guess she was never considered as genius level anyway. I can feel bad about somebody else responsible for getting her on that court, but not me. The court would likely function just as well, if not better, without her on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.