|
Posted on 02/28/2026 9:49:45 PM PST by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Ha ha - Chinese build Junk
MarQ
Where is there any book of the law so clear to each man
as that written in his heart
Leo Tolstoy
Drop 3002 3/7/19 We stand TOGETHER in this FIGHT. WWG1WGA!!! Q
https://x.com/rt_com/status/2030403758241264101
RT
@RT_com
IRANIANS TORCH CHILD SACRIFICE GOD BAAL STATUE
March 7, 2026
The author lives in Abu Dhabi:
Special update from Abu Dhabi
Everything’s OK
https://rationaloptimistsociety.substack.com/p/special-update-from-abu-dhabi
Excerpt:
.....For the past week my life depended on…
Patriot missiles.
The UAE used American-made Patriot (Phased Array Tracking Radar to Intercept on Target) missiles to stop the incoming barrage. Lockheed Martin is the only reason I wasn’t blown to smithereens.
Patriot missiles are awesome. They can track up to 100 targets at once, from 60 miles away. They obliterate their target by ramming directly into it at over 3,000 miles per hour.
There’s just one big problem.
They cost $4 million each, and we don’t make many of them. The US only produced 620 Patriots last year. Lockheed plans to scale up production to “a whopping” 2,000 per year… by 2030!
These missiles did an outstanding job protecting the Gulf over the past week. In the UAE alone they intercepted over 1,000 warheads and drones destined to kill.
But each one costs more than most people earn in a lifetime. And using $4 million missiles to destroy $20,000 drones is not sustainable. The UAE spent an estimated $1 billion per day on interceptions.
This illustrates a problem we’ve been talking about for a while: asymmetric warfare.
In Ukraine $500 drones packed with explosives routinely destroy $5 million tanks. In the history of warfare there has never been such an asymmetry between the cost of attacking and the cost of defending.
The math doesn’t work against enemies able to produce thousands of cheap drones. The defender goes bankrupt. You run out of interceptors before the attacker runs out of things to throw at you.
Which side runs out of ammo first could determine this war. For now it looks like Iran depleted its reserves. But it can make drones much faster than we can make missiles.
To quote Joseph Stalin…
“Quantity has a quality all of its own.”
What’s unfolding in the Gulf and Ukraine is the biggest shift in how wars are fought in our lifetimes.
War is moving from being dominated by big, expensive, exquisite systems to one where small, cheap and attritable wins. Unfortunately America and its allies are still fighting with the old playbook.
Five “prime” contractors control the US defense industry. Today 90% of all US missiles come from just three companies. Only three companies make US Air Force aircraft. There’s one main tank manufacturer in the entire country.
The main plant for high-volume artillery shell production churns out 40,000 rounds per month. Ukraine burns through that in roughly five days.
If you want to understand why mass matters in war, go read Arthur Herman’s Freedom’s Forge......
Freedom’s Forge explains how WWII was won not just by soldiers on the battlefield, but by workers on the factory floor. Germany and Japan had better weapons. But America won the war through sheer, overwhelming volume.
Sound familiar? We’re on the wrong side of that equation today.
This is a technology problem, not a spending problem.
You can’t solve cost asymmetry by spending more money. You can only solve it by collapsing the cost of defense to match the cost of offense.
I see four technologies that will reshape defense. Over the past year we’ve met many of the founders pioneering these solutions.
From our conversations it’s clear the future of defense will be a layered stack. There will be different tools for different threats, all dramatically lowering the “cost per kill.”
#1: Shoot them down with light.
You’ve heard of Israel’s Iron Dome, which saved thousands of lives by destroying incoming rockets.
But do you know about the Iron Beam?
Iron Beam concentrates two high-energy laser beams onto a coin-sized point on an incoming drone or rocket. The beams burn through the target in seconds. Israeli defense company Rafael built the Iron Beam, and it’s now live in Israel.
The Iron Beam shoots down drones for a reported $3.50 per kill. For perspective the Iron Dome’s Tamir interceptor costs roughly $40,000.
That $3.50 figure doesn’t account for the roughly $1.5 billion it took to develop the system or the estimated $250 million per laser battery. The “all-in” cost is around $2,000 per kill.
But unlike missiles, a laser never runs out of shots. You just need electricity.
There are limitations. Lasers degrade in rain, fog and heavy cloud. That’s why they can’t be the only layer.
My No. 1 startup to watch in the laser arena is Aurelius Systems. San Francisco-based Aurelius is trying to make laser weapons cheap and scalable, like what SpaceX did to rockets. I met founder Michael LaFramboise last summer.
The Pentagon just awarded Aurelius a contract to develop its Archimedes laser system, which detects, tracks and takes out drones. Early days, but one to keep an eye on.
#2: AI-guided turrets that don’t miss.
For the threats lasers can’t handle you need kinetic solutions. Bullets.
Enter Allen Control Systems (ACS) and its autonomous turret, Bullfrog.
Bullfrog is a 165-pound, AI-powered gun turret that can be mounted on a truck. Bullfrog gives an M240 machine gun computer vision and AI to identify and shoot down enemy drones autonomously.
.....My back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest turrets like Bullfrog are currently the cheapest “kinetic” solution. It’s already won contracts here in the UAE......
#3: Fight drones with cheaper drones.
If drones are the problem, why not use drones as the solution?
The leader here is Neros.
Neros makes small, cheap, disposable strike drones. Its Archer drone is the size of a dinner plate and weighs about 3 lbs. To launch an Archer, simply toss it into the air. These are the types of quadcopters dominating Ukrainian battlefields.
.....Neros’s story is almost too good. CEO Soren Monroe-Anderson is 22. His cofounder Olaf is 24. They were so obsessed with building and flying drones they skipped their senior proms. When they tried to sell to the military, a Pentagon official told them: “You can’t just waltz into the Pentagon as 21-year-olds and sell weapon systems to the D.O.D.”
Two years later they’ve won contracts with the Army and Marines and are building a 250,000-square-foot factory to make a million drones a year. Neros will be America’s largest drone producer by an order of magnitude this year.
All Neros has to do is repurpose its attack drones into interceptor drones.
Using swarms of cheap drones instead of expensive missiles is already happening in Ukraine. “First-person-view” drones repurposed as interceptors downed over 850 Russian reconnaissance drones in the past few months.
#4: Jam them before they arrive.
Electronic warfare (EW) is the most underappreciated layer of the defense stack.
Most drones rely on GPS for navigation and radio links for control. This is how a soldier crouched in a bunker can fly drones into targets a few miles away with just a VR headset and controller. But jam those signals, and the drone goes blind.
The spectrum war is invisible, but it’s already shaping the battlefield in Ukraine and elsewhere.
CX2 Industries is our No. 1 “seed” in electronic warfare.
“We’re building night vision goggles for the battlefield. If an enemy system emits a signal, it dies.” That’s what CX2 founder Nathan Mintz told me ......
CX2 isn’t just jamming drones. Nathan’s point is the entire electromagnetic spectrum has become a new battlefield. Any machine America sends into battle needs EW solutions.
CX2 is building the tools to dominate this new battlefield, and EVERY defense company will need them. It could be the NVIDIA of the defense renaissance.
The advantage EW has is you’re not firing a missile or a bullet. You’re projecting energy, which is highly repeatable. Squint and you start to see a defense architecture where the cost of defending approaches the cost of attacking.
That flips the math back in our favor, which is why I’m optimistic.
This week was a wake-up call.
I’m grateful for the Patriots that kept us safe. But the future belongs to the startups building lasers, AI turrets, interceptor drones and jamming systems that do the same job for orders of magnitude less.
Patriots: $4 million per kill. Lasers: $2,000. AI turrets: $200. Interceptor drones: $3,000. Electronic warfare: the cost of electricity. That’s where war is going.
.....
| MAGA Posts | |||
 Trump summit |  Save America | ||
 Thank you America |  America-maxxing | ||
F-22 Raptor - Tip of the Spear
America's Sky Dominator Unleashed in Iran!
Check this viral TikTok clip ⬆️ https://t.co/WaCMGJCWHs
A single U.S. F-22 shreds Iran's last three F-14 Tomcats in UNDER 30 seconds.
No contest, pure American air superiority!
This beast is the… pic.twitter.com/QawzEFpWTm— Capt Kyle (@CaptKylePatriot) March 7, 2026
Canada’s Euthanasia Regime Now Rivals the Nazi Program Canadian Soldiers Died to Defeat
https://newsletter.amuseonx.com/p/canadas-euthanasia-regime-now-rivals
Excerpt:
Canada has now recorded roughly 100,000 deaths under its Medical Assistance in Dying program. That number deserves to be stated plainly because its scale is extraordinary. During World War II Canadians fought in Europe to defeat Nazi Germany. Yet the Nazi regime killed fewer Canadians than the Canadian government has now ended through its own euthanasia system. What began as a narrowly framed medical policy has grown into one of the largest state‑run euthanasia programs in modern history.
Historians estimate that roughly 200,000 disabled and mentally ill Germans were killed under the Nazi euthanasia system known as Aktion T4 and its successor programs. Canada, having already reached about 100,000 deaths, is now halfway to that grim benchmark. The number continues to climb rapidly. Canada is currently killing roughly 50 of its own citizens every day through MAID, and the rate continues to increase as eligibility expands.
.....But public policy must be judged not only by its intentions but by its structure and trajectory. When examined carefully, Canada’s euthanasia regime reveals a pattern that should alarm anyone concerned about the protection of human life. The program has expanded rapidly. It increasingly involves people who are not dying. It has created institutional incentives within bureaucracies. And it relies heavily on language that softens the reality of what is occurring. At the end of the process a physician administers a lethal substance and a citizen dies.
To understand why this development is so troubling it helps to examine a historical parallel. The comparison is uncomfortable, but it illuminates the moral structure of the system. That comparison is the Nazi euthanasia program known as Aktion T4.
Aktion T4 began in Germany in the late 1930s. It targeted people with severe disabilities and mental illnesses. The program was administered by physicians and organized through bureaucratic review systems. Paperwork moved through offices. Doctors evaluated patients. Lethal procedures were carried out in medical settings. The killings were justified using the language of mercy and relief from suffering.
The resemblance to Canada’s current system is not superficial. Both programs rely on the medical profession to carry out intentional death. Both systems use administrative procedures to determine who qualifies. Both employ euphemistic language that frames killing as compassion. And in both cases disability and chronic suffering become central to the eligibility discussion.
None of this means Canada is Nazi Germany. Canada remains a democratic society with formal consent procedures and reporting rules. But the comparison does not depend on identical political systems. It depends on structural similarities. Once a society authorizes physicians to intentionally end lives through bureaucratic processes, certain patterns begin to emerge.
The first pattern is medicalization. Killing becomes a medical treatment. Patients enter a clinical pathway. Physicians evaluate eligibility criteria. Forms are completed. Procedures are performed in hospitals and clinics. The authority of medicine gives the act an appearance of legitimacy. The white coat becomes the uniform through which the state exercises its power over life and death.
The second pattern is bureaucratic routinization. Decisions about life and death move through administrative systems......A lethal decision becomes simply another form approved by the system.
The third pattern is rhetorical softening. Language changes how the public perceives the act. The Nazi regime spoke of mercy killing and euthanasia. Canada speaks of medical assistance in dying. The phrases differ, but the function is similar. Each term reframes intentional killing as a therapeutic act.
The fourth pattern involves expansion. Systems built around euthanasia rarely remain confined to their original boundaries. Canada’s MAID program illustrates this dynamic clearly. When the policy was introduced it was largely presented as a measure for patients near death. In 2021 Parliament passed Bill C‑7, dramatically expanding eligibility by creating what is now known as Track 2 MAID.
Under Track 2, individuals whose deaths are not reasonably foreseeable may still qualify for euthanasia if they experience suffering deemed intolerable. The practical effect is that disability, chronic illness, psychological suffering, poverty, and social isolation now appear at the center of many eligibility debates. This shift has transformed MAID from an end‑of‑life measure into a far broader mechanism for state‑facilitated death.
The consequences of that shift are already visible.
.....The secrecy surrounding the decision is striking. In Nazi Germany families were frequently kept in the dark about euthanasia decisions precisely to prevent relatives from intervening to protect vulnerable family members. The Nichols case reveals a similar dynamic. Those most likely to object were excluded from the process.
Other cases reveal a deeper structural problem. Individuals who lack housing, adequate disability services, or sufficient medical care sometimes pursue MAID after struggling unsuccessfully to obtain help. In such circumstances the choice to die cannot be understood in isolation from the surrounding social conditions.
The state faces an economic decision. It can spend public resources providing housing, medical care, and long‑term assistance, or it can authorize death and remove the burden entirely. When death becomes the cheaper option the moral structure of the system begins to resemble the logic that underpinned the Nazi euthanasia program. That regime openly described disabled people as economic burdens on society.
Economic incentives also appear in the controversy surrounding Canada’s Veterans Affairs system. Veterans who approached the agency seeking help for PTSD were told the condition could be extremely difficult to treat and might persist for years. In that context some officials began presenting assisted suicide as an option.
The consequences were predictable. Some veterans accepted the offer. Each acceptance meant one fewer patient requiring long‑term treatment and one fewer costly disability case......
..... Supporters argue that MAID is grounded in autonomy.
.....Autonomy is an important moral value. But autonomy alone cannot sustain a humane society. Human decisions are shaped by social conditions. Poverty, disability, loneliness, and lack of medical support can push individuals toward despair. In those circumstances the line between voluntary choice and social abandonment becomes dangerously thin.
Canada’s MAID program is following a disturbingly similar trajectory. Eligibility has expanded. Deaths are increasing rapidly. Cases increasingly involve people who are not dying but who face social hardship, disability, or psychological suffering.
Christian moral philosophy offers a stark warning about this path. Human life possesses intrinsic dignity because every person is created in the image of God. That dignity does not depend on health, productivity, or independence. When a society begins to treat vulnerable lives as problems to be solved through death it abandons one of the most fundamental moral principles of civilization.
.....
BREAKING! – Finalizing Analysis of Texas Primary Election Data
…Something has gone Terribly Wrong!
Analyzing early voting data for the 2026 Primary Election provided by the state of Texas, Unite4Freedom is finding a continuation of what occurred during the early voting for the 2024 GE.
......So, what’s the verdict for the 2026 Primary?
More of the same…
We don’t have final numbers yet – look for our release on Sunday which will reveal the detailed analysis. What we can share so far is that the data is demonstrating the same evidence of real-time vote tampering. One new insight we have during the 2026 Primary will answer one of the lingering questions we hear every time we talk about election validity – Who cheats more, the ‘right’ or the ‘left’? Neither side of the aisle claims the title as ‘supreme cheat’ – give me a minute and I’ll share why we think that is, at the end of this post.
Take a look at these two line graphs below.
There are two important details we can observe.
First, let’s explain what we are looking at. Each of these line graphs represents only the total vote count for one day of early voting, 2/17/2026. The first data set we have that reflects votes cast on 2/17/2026 for each party is about 2/19 or 2/20. One might think that the state would know by 2/19 or 2/20, who voted on 2/17, but both line graphs show that the total vote count for that day continues to change over time. The vertical lines indicate when the total vote count for votes cast on 2/17/2026 changed, and much more difficult to explain, the arrows indicate the direction of the change.
There might be an explanation for a few records – a few ballots – to be added later than the rest for any given day. Maybe adjudication, or resolving provisional ballots, would increase the count slightly over time.
That is not what the data shows.
What it does show is significant changes in total vote count and it shows the count increasing and decreasing back and forth numerous times.
Both the Democrat and Republican ballot count had 7 major changes to the total vote count. The Democrat voter data shows the total DECREASES four times during early voting; and the Republican voter data shows the total DECREASES three times during early voting. Both the Democrat and Republican data reflect a swing of about 20,000 ballots which is +/- 20% of the average total. Comparing the two line graphs, you may notice that there are similar changes at the same time during early voting but the changes are not at the same magnitude for each party.
It’s hard to understand what is happening here, but it looks like batch processing applying changes to the voter participation data. One thing we do know though, is that the total voter count for this date does change over time.
These are the patterns that are revealing themselves as we complete our analysis and peer review. Once we are certain of our findings we will share the full detail. Our current target for that release is Sunday evening, 3/8/2026. Check back for the final report.
Coming back to the question… Who cheats more, the ‘right’ or the ‘left’? We can see that the Democrat and the Republican Primary Data reflect similar tampering.
Why?
Because this rig is not about the voters, it’s not about parties, it’s about the outcome. It looks like the injected ballots are getting banked for wherever might be needed to steer outcomes later – regardless of party. Considering this, it really appears that this is not executed by people “on the ground” or even County Level actors – this is happening at the State level or above – which is how National Federal Elections are controlled.
After all that, the most important point to keep in mind. If this is happening at the state level or higher, we have no way of knowing if this is happening within or from outside of the US.
This is a complete loss of control of our election process, and it may be at the hands of a foreign actor. This IS a National Security Emergency. We need Federal Action Now.
Referenced graphs can be viewed at link
https://x.com/Unite4Freedom/status/2030030186700234895?s=20
+++++++++!!!!!!!!!
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot...
.jpg)
Mt. Drum, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Alaska
+++++++++++!!!!!!!!
Candace Owens is compromised.
-SB
nobody mentioned that Pres. Trump was the money man behind Jesse’s two presidential runs ? according to no-one else but Judge Joe Brown
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
