Manhattan Contrarian ping
Plants love CO2. I love plants. I think vehicles today run clean enough, mostly blue skies for many years now, not the “smog” years of the 60’s and 70’s. Rivers and lakes cleaner, better fishing, life is good.
This morning, American Thinker has an article titled "There’s Only One Greenhouse Gas—And It Isn’t CO2". Hint: it's water vapor. Something that climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer stated many times. Some of us might remember him as Rush titled him: "The official climatologist of the EIB Network".
To celebrate, I cleaned out my own Greenhouse, yesterday! *SMIRK*
Yes, the climate is changing. Yes, the climate has always changed. Yes, the climate will always be changing. It is NOT the fault of humans.
(But I am glad they have cleaned up where companies were polluting with toxic chemicals!)
They did their testing of CO2 by putting their heads in plastic bags and when the testers died they declared CO2 bad ,LOL
You mean that stuff that makes our vegetables and trees and flowers grow?
Thank God!
Trees love CO2 and other “greenhouse gases”.
Billions if not Trillions of dollars for 0.017 C in nearly 100 years? What that prick with ears Obama and his gang have put us through for nothing is worthy of the death penalty or worse.
.
And just like that, I no longer feel endangered. 😊👍
Still waiting for THE COMING ICE AGE which was all the rage in the 1970s.
Looks like it is finally on the way!
https://blog.sciandnature.com/2024/11/a-mini-ice-age-could-hit-earth-by-2030.html
https://issuesinsights.com/2025/11/18/meet-the-new-ice-age-same-as-the-old-ice-age/
A commie pamphlet.
So maybe they’ll start putting the proper propellent back into the albuterol inhalers. Anyone with asthma or COPD can tell you what a mess they made by forcing the manufacturer’s to change the propellent because of glo-bull warming.
When they are back in power, they will reassert that the EPA (or whatever it evolves into) does have the authority to regulate CO2 and whatever the chemical du jour might be.
They can attack the futility angle by producing different numbers on the effects of GHGs. Also, they can argue that we even if we can’t do it all, we can’t expect other countries to get with the program if we don’t.