Bill Clinton wants a public hearing

I have provided a sworn statement of what I know. And just this week, I’ve agreed to appear in person before the committee. But it’s still not enough for Republicans on the House Oversight Committee.

Now, Chairman Comer says he wants cameras, but only behind closed doors. Who benefits from this arrangement? It’s not Epstein’s victims, who deserve justice. Not the public, who deserve the truth. It serves only partisan interests. This is not fact-finding, it’s pure politics.

I will not sit idly as they use me as a prop in a closed-door kangaroo court by a Republican Party running scared. If they want answers, let’s stop the games & do this the right way: in a public hearing, where the American people can see for themselves what this is really about.

“””Epstein victims are all adults now they can come out and say whatever they want on what happened to them.”””

Exactly. I hear it all the time that they want to get their story out and name names. Well....go ahead and do it.
The statute of limitations has run out so they also don’t need to worry about getting charged with being a prostitute which is what they were.

And the Clintons can go on tv any time they want and tell the whole story. What is stopping them?

“Are there state secrets involved?”

If the hearings are handled correctly there would be. I’d love to see Bill grilled about Clinton’s/Epstein’s roles in Iran-Contra; CIA money laundering; the Mena, Arkansas airport/drug operations; Epstein’s mafia connections; Epstein’s role in the Clinton’s financial affairs; how Epstein supported the Clintons’ ascent to Power; and E’s role in setting up the Clinton Foundation. At a publicly broadcast live hearing NONE of this will come up, and Clinton knows it.

Congress has been ultra concerned about withholding the identities of any victims who haven’t made themselves known to the public, as well as others somehow in Epstein’s orbit for who there is no evidence of wrongdoing. Bill knows that a public live hearing makes protecting victims difficult.

I’d love to see Bill asked whether he EVER had any form of sexual relations with a minor or minors while he was an adult (such as when he and Roger Clinton had coke and sex parties with underaged band groupies while Bill was AG). He’ll either lie, or open the barn door.

“I’m surprised that Comer would want it private. I think it’s best to be in front of an audience for all to see. Clinton was impeached because we saw him lie during a deposition with our own eyes. Had it been private, he might never have been impeached.”

Bill Clinton fought that deposition tooth and nail. And, it was video recorded, behind closed doors.

He and his “team,” along with the mainstream media, allowed him to spin and lie about the Monica Lewinsky affair - until it was released publicly . . .

The committee should do exactly the opposite of what Slick Willy wants.

I disagree. What he wants is to have the hearing behind closed doors. Doing so would help protect him and others who were guests of Epstein. Wanting the hearing in private would make him look guilty. He is just demanding it to be held in public so the public and the bigwigs will 'do the opposite' of what he asks for. I cite your comment as proof it would work.

That way he won't be blamed for the manner in which the hearings occur.

The Lolita Island trips were not about having illicit or illegal sex. If one of the ruling elite wanted to have sex with a minor, they would do so in complete privacy. They could order a male or female minor from Amazon and none would be the wiser. If it was truly for 'minor sex' why were there no 'boys' in Epstein's 'harem' ?

What the 'ruling elite' DON'T WANT is for the public to find out that our government officials were meeting up with other 'ruling elites' and making plans to increase their wealth and retain power via clandestine meetings with other corrupt elites. The girls were just cover. These meetings amounted to treason against the US public and that is why the focus is being kept on 'sex with minors'

It's not about the girls and who went there. It's about WHOM they met with while there and what was discussed.

The subject of those discussions is what they want kept private, and WHY they gave the girls around $1 Million each and had them sign a NDA. It wasn't about underage sex. Epstein is the only one who had sex with two of the girls who lied about their age and the third incident was about a Prince who got a little too handsy with the Hooter's girls and tried to treat them as as if they were PRIME BEEF on sale at the stockyards. If that is all there were to it, there would be no need to 'pay off' the rest of the girls and cement their silence on the members of such meetups and the plans of mice and men.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.