Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: SpaceX wants to turn Space into the World’s Biggest AI Data Center.
X ^ | 01/31/2026 | DogeDesigner

Posted on 01/31/2026 3:27:11 AM PST by SmokingJoe

BREAKING: SpaceX wants to turn Space into the World’s Biggest AI Data Center.

• SpaceX is seeking approval to launch and operate up to one million satellites designed to function as orbital data centers.

• These satellites would provide massive computing power to support advanced artificial intelligence and data processing.

• The system would rely on near constant solar energy in space, reducing operating costs and environmental impact compared to Earth based data centers.

• Satellites would operate between 500 km and 2,000 km in altitude, across multiple orbital shells, to handle global demand.

• High speed laser links would connect the satellites with each other and with the Starlink network, enabling petabit level data transfer.

• Data would ultimately be routed to authorized ground stations around the world.

• SpaceX says demand from AI, machine learning, and edge computing is growing faster than terrestrial infrastructure can handle.

The company frames this as a major step toward a future where humanity becomes a multi planetary civilization powered by space based infrastructure.

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: astronomy; data; datacenters; elon; investing; musk; nasa; satellites; science; spacedatacenter; spacedatacenters; spacex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: quantim

It might be better then putting them on farmland, sucking up the local water supply and screwing up our electric bills.


21 posted on 01/31/2026 4:22:36 AM PST by GranTorino (Bloody Lips Save Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Yep. That’s where the EU is screwing itself out of a position in the AI race. They believe they can create a healthy environment for AI development by regulating it out of existence.


22 posted on 01/31/2026 4:27:10 AM PST by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

23 posted on 01/31/2026 4:34:00 AM PST by Tom Tetroxide (Psalm 146:3 "Do not trust in princes, in the Son of Man, who has no salvation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Gee, what could possibly go wrong?


24 posted on 01/31/2026 4:40:54 AM PST by AFB-XYZ (( We have two options: 1. Stand up, or 2. Bend over))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AFB-XYZ

Same things that “went wrong” with Falcon 9 and the Dragon space craft to the Space Station, which have been working flawlessly.


25 posted on 01/31/2026 4:46:36 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AFB-XYZ
That was the day SpaceX became sentient.


26 posted on 01/31/2026 4:48:33 AM PST by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

Solves the cooling issue.


27 posted on 01/31/2026 4:49:29 AM PST by grobdriver (The CDC can KMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Sky Net. Get to the choppa


28 posted on 01/31/2026 5:00:52 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

They’ll clean it up..


29 posted on 01/31/2026 5:02:18 AM PST by Theophilus (covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

?????


30 posted on 01/31/2026 5:06:03 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

Not really. Very hard to cool in a vacuum. No convection.


31 posted on 01/31/2026 5:16:39 AM PST by Theophilus (covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

The way Starship is going, they could replace the whole constellation in a week.


32 posted on 01/31/2026 5:18:58 AM PST by Theophilus (covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Time to re-read Neuromancer...


33 posted on 01/31/2026 5:23:48 AM PST by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

This is beyond dumb. Put your data centers underground where they’re protected.


34 posted on 01/31/2026 5:24:02 AM PST by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Do we really need all this AI crap?


35 posted on 01/31/2026 5:25:47 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

We may as well build a Dyson Sphere around Earth and be done with it. As an amateur astronomer, I’m not crazy about the idea. And what about our space exploration- are we going to have to dodge Starlink On Steroids to get to the Moon and beyond?


36 posted on 01/31/2026 5:28:43 AM PST by telescope115 (Ad Astra, Ad Deum…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telescope115

You don’t ave to dodge anything, given you are not building any space ships.


37 posted on 01/31/2026 5:37:50 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
Joke post yes?
You cannot be serious.
Where will the vast electric power come from underground?
38 posted on 01/31/2026 5:41:59 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Less than a hour ago, I read a science article about satellite risk in Low Earth Orbit.

Low-Earth orbit is just 2.8 days from disaster

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/01/260128075341.htm

A Princeton researcher and her colleagues created a model of what would happen if Earth was struck by a magnetic storm equal to The Great Carrington event in 1859.

Currently, dozens of LEO satellites must make course corrections every day to avoid space junk and other satellites.

A massive magnetic storm would instantly disrupt course corrections.

Over a period of 2.8 days, the number of collisions would increase to a chaotic level that would eventually kill or disrupt every active satellite in orbit.

39 posted on 01/31/2026 5:50:08 AM PST by zeestephen (Trump Landslide? Kamala lost the election by 230,000 votes, in WI, MI, and PA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
I'm trying to get a picture of this, and while it seems very possible, feasibility rears it's head and presents questions.

1. What is the projected cost, versus terrestrial data centers in the future. The main reason we hear about putting AI in space is the load on the power grid. Take into account on earth we can build point-of-load power sources, be they nuclear or solar that would not cause greenhouse effects. IIRC, the incident solar radiation in space is only a little more than 2x what it is on the ground. Does that factor justify putting data centers in orbit?

2. The orbital altitude stated, I believe puts at least some of the satellites in the Van Allen belt, meaning more shielding would be required, presumably adding weight to the payload.

3. If the satellites are not in a near-polar orbit, a fraction of them will be eclipsed by the earth and lose power. To remain on-line some means of energy storage would be needed.

4. Why would so many satellites be needed? Why not scale up to larger satellites/solar arrays and fewer launches.

5. Does latency in data exchange over distance, either between satellites in space, or between space and ground introduce a degraded performance?

Not being negative here, considering Musk has an amazing track record of getting ideas into fruition. There are always technical problems facing anything of this magnitude, but Engineers are quite adept at finding solutions that work.

40 posted on 01/31/2026 5:57:11 AM PST by omni-scientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson