|
Posted on 12/31/2025 9:00:00 PM PST by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
***I think Ice should station cars around Police Headquarters and City hall and let the Harrassers and their whistles bother the city officials.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Better yet, put on bumper stickers that say “Whistle if you like ICE!”
🐷
The fight against government-backed online censorship has achieved important victories in the United States but is rapidly losing the global war.
| Category | Main Developments |
|---|---|
| United States | ● President Trump significantly defunded domestic parts of the Censorship Industrial Complex → Major rollback of federal involvement in content moderation pressure |
| Global trend | ● Censorship is dramatically expanding worldwide → EU, Brazil, Australia, Stanford network, BRICS coordination → European Union preparing huge fines against X (≈ €140 million threatened) |
| Most dangerous new EU proposals | ● End of online anonymity ● Chat control (scanning private messages) ● "Democracy Shield" – protecting bureaucrats from democratic accountability → Overall direction: stronger narrative control, less citizen freedom |
| Historical proof (Twitter Files) | ● 2021 – Harvard professor Martin Kulldorff censored for correct statement about natural immunity ● Shadow-banning of Jay Bhattacharya ● Suppression of real vaccine injury stories ● Pre-censorship + narrative control of Hunter Biden laptop story |
| Core mechanism | ● Governments + ex-intelligence + universities + NGOs act as "trusted flaggers" → Demand secret removal/suppression of true but inconvenient information → Goal is not fighting "misinformation" → goal is narrative & behavior control |
| Prediction | ● Within a few years the most intolerant people on Earth could dominate and control the global internet → Unless the current acceleration is stopped |
Shellenberger's final message:
Free speech is essential for science, democracy, journalism and civilization itself.
It is the only cause worth dying for.
20,000 is just a drop in the bucket, My FRiend.
so hell is exothermic ?
USGS releases assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in Woodford and Barnett shales (part of the Permian Basin)
28.3 trillion cubic feet of gas and 1.6 billion barrels of oil estimated in New Mexico, Texas
Excerpt:
The U.S. Geological Survey released its assessment of undiscovered gas and oil in the Woodford and Barnett shales in the Permian Basin, assessing that there are technically recoverable resources of 28.3 trillion cubic feet of gas – enough to supply the United States for 10 months at the current rate of consumption — and 1.6 billion barrels of oil, or 10 weeks’ supply for the nation.
***so hell is exothermic ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(Sorry in advance for the wall of text)
The following is the answer to an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry midterm. The answer was so profound that the professor shared it with colleagues, which is why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.
Bonus question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law (gas cools off when it expands and heats up when it is compressed) or some variant. So did this student, but with a twist:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing with time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions, and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially.
Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell. Because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities:
If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.
Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it?
If we accept the postulate given to me by Ms. Teresa Banyan during my freshman year “that it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you” and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then #2 cannot be true; and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and will not freeze.
THE STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY “A” GIVEN.
https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/humor/hell.html
🐷
Business Is Apparently Selling AI-Hallucination-Filled Documents to Unwary Litigants, Court Says
https://reason.com/volokh/2026/01/16/business-is-apparently-selling-ai-hallucination-filled-documents-to-unwary-litigants-court-says/
**********************************************
From Judge Michael Liburdi (D. Ariz.) last Friday in Gardner v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC:
Through these proceedings, brought by Plaintiff to halt a foreclosure of her home, the Court learned of non-party document preparers seeming to hold themselves out as attorneys and using undisclosed artificial intelligence platforms (”AI”) to draft documents used in this litigation on Plaintiff’s behalf. By all appearances, these document preparers purported to help her prevent foreclosure of her home while diverting funds she could have used towards the mortgage payment it and preparing claims without legal basis for Plaintiff to file.
Thus, the Court brings the matter to the attention of the State Bar of Arizona and the Attorney General of Arizona. The Court instructs the Clerk of Court to provide a copy of this order to each for investigation, if appropriate, and such further action as these entities deem necessary….
After the death of her husband, Plaintiff took over the financial responsibilities of her household; as a result, she faced foreclosure and initiated this action. A recognized title company referred Plaintiff to Clearpoint. Fearful of losing her home, Plaintiff hired Clearpoint to prepare her legal documents.
Plaintiff did not understand any of the legal documents she submitted to the Court and followed instructions from Clearpoint throughout the litigation process because her contacts called themselves the “Litigation Team.” … After removing the case [to federal court], Nationstar filed responsive pleadings, in which it highlighted over sixty instances of inapplicable law, nonexistent cases or legal principles, and misconstrued holdings and quotations in Plaintiff’s Complaint and Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
The Court then issued an Order to Show Cause for why her motion should not be denied because of the hallucinated or misconstrued legal authorities in Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Order to Show Cause prompted Plaintiff to reach out to an attorney friend, who explained the legal documents Plaintiff had filed and helped her understand that Clearpoint cited nonexistent or misrepresented law throughout her pleadings.
At the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, Plaintiff conceded that she had not met the requirements for a preliminary injunction, conveyed that she intended to dismiss her case because the third-party document preparation company she hired put together documents that she did not understand, and realized that she probably could not prevail in court. She also suggested she would rather spend money on trying to reinstate her loan than on further litigating the case. Then, in her response to the Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff disclosed the specifics around Clearpoint’s role and explained that she was unaware that Clearpoint used AI to create the filings.
In Plaintiff’s response to the Order to Show Cause [available here -EV], she explained that she had no legal understanding of the proceedings to that point and relied on Clearpoint for legal advice. She revealed that she paid Clearpoint $1,000 per month from April 2024 to September 2025, and that her main contact at Clearpoint was Juan Rodriguez. Plaintiff explained that given her new information, she was working with Nationstar’s counsel to reinstate her loan and reach a stipulation of Dismissal….
[A.] Unauthorized Practice of Law
While Arizona does not currently prohibit the use of AI to prepare court filings, it does take issue with unlicensed entities and individuals practicing law. The Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court prohibit any person or entity who is not a member of the Arizona State Bar from providing legal services or using a designation “reasonably likely to induce others to believe” they are allowed to practice law.......
The Court has concerns that Clearpoint engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. A major part of an attorney’s role in litigation is preparing and filing motions with the Court. According to Plaintiff, Clearpoint prepared motions and other pleadings on her behalf for filing with the Court. Plaintiff’s points of contact at Clearpoint were Juan Rodriguez and Paul Vierra. From the Court’s review of the State Bar’s Member Directory, neither are licensed to practice law in Arizona.
.....Furthermore, Plaintiff’s contacts at Clearpoint called themselves the “Litigation Team.” The label “Litigation Team” could be within the “other equivalent words” contemplated by Rule 31.2(b), since litigation is a primary function of attorneys and may “reasonably … induce others to believe” that Clearpoint was authorized to practice law....The Court thus refers investigation of this question to the Arizona State Bar, should the State Bar find such an investigation pertinent….
[B.] Consumer Protection Concerns
Arizona prohibits any person or entity from misrepresenting, omitting, concealing or otherwise engaging in deception regarding material facts with the intent that consumers will rely on those misrepresentations in commercial transactions. This prohibition extends to the sale of services. The Court is concerned that Clearpoint may have engaged in deceptive practices by using AI without disclosing such to Plaintiff, which resulted in inapplicable and hallucinated legal authority, and that this misrepresentation induced Plaintiff to undertake unnecessary litigation expenses, including Clearpoint’s fee. The Court is further concerned, as discussed above, that Clearpoint inappropriately positioned itself to suggest it could assist with Arizona court filings.
Clearpoint appears to have used AI to prepare filings for Plaintiff without her knowledge or consent. The Complaint and Amended Motion for a Preliminary Injunction have all the hallmarks of AI; both documents used an unusual structure, cited hallucinated cases and statutes, and misinterpreted existing law. It appears that Plaintiff discovered Clearpoint’s use of AI in their document preparation services as a direct result of the Order to Show Cause. Until that point, Plaintiff relied on Clearpoint and thought them qualified. Her response also suggests that she only wanted her loan reinstated and “[did] not want to pursue any litigation contrary to reinstatement.”.....
Perhaps most troubling, Clearpoint’s preparation of motions and other filings, potentially without attorney oversight, and seemingly undisclosed use of AI diverted Plaintiff’s limited resources. Clearpoint charged Plaintiff $1,000 per month for services while she was in a vulnerable position with respect to her home, further exacerbating the possibility that she would lose it. Clearpoint also caused this Court and Defendant to expend significant resources in attempting to research several hallucinated cases, preparing for hearings, and drafting legitimate legal documents based in fact and good law in response to a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction that lacked legal basis.
Thus, the Court refers this matter to the Arizona Attorney General’s Office for potential investigation of Clearpoint under any applicable consumer protection law, if the Attorney General finds such actions warranted….
.....Note that the company that’s the subject of these allegations appears not to be this ClearPoint Strategy, but rather appears to be this other ClearPoint Strategy; and note again that at this point these are just allegations made in court filings and taken seriously by a court, and not proof.
**********************
AI-hallucinating documents that cite nonexistent legal cases.
View of the Franklin Mountains in El Paso, Texas, looking north to the Organ Mountains of New Mexico. The area sits atop the Woodford Shale
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
