Wow. Suing over NOT being allowed to break the law. The times they are a-changing.
Round the trespassers up and throw them out of the USA !
They are not “migrants.” They are criminals violating U.S. federal immigration law.
Criminal aliens playing hide and Sikh with the law.
The faster we can kick these criminals out, the faster we can remove the danger of mass trucker strikes that cripple California’s economy.
Train American drivers as fast as you can so these illegals can’t threaten our safety.
So this is not from the Bee?
Sad thing is, I could see them winning this, with all these liberals in charge of everything, especially the judiciary.
lol... they have no legal standing.
For many years I have stressed that there is only one God given right and that is to be conceived as that is the only right that is actually controlled by God directly. Everything else is a privilege because it carries responsibilities.
A God given right cannot be revoked. A privilege can. It is not God’s decision to do some of the things we do. It’s man’s through the free will God provides. This is one of them. Privileges carry responsibilities. Rights only require existence.
wy69
Where in the US Constitution are the rights of law breaking illegals enumerated?
What I have found out is that you can sue anyone for anything. Doesn’t mean you are in the right or that you’ll win. I could sue Free Republic for using the word ‘Free’.
I think you DO need to draw a distinction between illegal and legal immigrants. No illegal should be issued any kind of license.
As far as legal immigrants go, they should be able to speak/read English proficiently and pass the same tests as US citizen truckers for their CDLs. No double standards should be allowed.
“same day or before the expiration of the driver’s work authorization or legal presence documents”
Not sure these are illegals.
... any lawyers that would take a case that involves an illegal bringing suit against any USA institution should be put in the stock for a considerable time.
The only ‘right’ any illegal has is the right to not be shot on sight. Try ‘accidently’ crossing the border is one of the koranimal countries. You would disappear - literally. Your corpse would be tossed into a ravine to feed the night creatures.
Our legal system is composed of the law and precedent. When California issued CDL’s to illegals they set a precedent. A precedent can be used to modify the law. For example, a town enacts a law to prevent people from walking their ducks after sunset. (As I recall, that’s an actual law somewhere.) For decades people walk their ducks after sunset and do not get arrested or fined. Then, one night, someone gets arrested and charged. The lawyer for the duck walker would argue that the law was rendered null and void and his client is the subject of selective enforcement. (Not legal advice. Don’t walk your ducks based on a Free Republic post.)
I don’t think the truckers have a good case, but this is California. They’ll probably get a ten-billion-dollar settlement.
-—— a lawsuit brought on behalf of nearly-——
The law firm realized there was a tremendous opportunity here.
By persuading the driver unions to sue, the lawyers developed an unending revenue stream from a class action that can go nationwide.
And, while the lawsuit is in process, the lawyers will argue that the illegal alien drivers cannot be deported
They have no standing,
throw them and their lawyer out of our Country
They already belong to the democrats.
How about the usual decline we get: lack of standing.