|
Posted on 11/30/2025 9:00:00 PM PST by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Interdasting...
Nick Shirley:
“This is a prime example of the BILLIONS of dollars in fraud happening right now in Minnesota, this is one of the hundreds of “daycares” receiving millions of dollars from the government, this daycare (that can’t even spell learning right) received $1,900,000 in tax exempt funding from CCAP in 2025.
This is just one of the 1,000’s of fraudulent businesses operating in Minnesota.”
https://truthsocial.com/@CitizenFreePress/115772618052575487
1 MIN VIDEO
This article is challenging and requires further study on my part. This following statement is one that I could possibly be at least partly to blame for fabricating:
According to mainstream medicine, shingles is caused by the varicella-zoster virus—the same virus blamed for chickenpox. The story goes like this: after a childhood case of chickenpox, the virus retreats into nerve tissue where it lies dormant, sometimes for decades. Then, when the immune system weakens due to stress, aging, or other factors, the virus “reactivates” and travels along nerve pathways to the skin, causing the characteristic painful, blistering rash in a band-like pattern called a dermatome
I have argued this same worded argument with doctors back in the 80s and it was my own theorizing, not repetition of something I read. The doctor's counter argument defied currently accepted medical practice, BUT may actually fit in with the toxicity theory presented here. IOW, my explanation at that time was more in line with accepted medical practice then... the counter argument was more in line with this toxicity theory - which did not exist at that time.
A curious anomaly. 🤔
This next excerpt from the article exactly explains my own personal experience - and it has puzzled me ever since:
Reports of shingles following COVID vaccination surged dramatically. Case reports and observational studies documented the pattern: individuals developing shingles days to weeks after receiving mRNA or adenovirus-vector COVID vaccines, often in people with no prior history of the condition or who had not experienced an outbreak in decades. The phenomenon was common enough to generate its own body of medical literature attempting to explain why a vaccine might “reactivate” a “dormant virus.”
This direct statistical relationship between the CoViD mRNA vaccines and the manifestation of a soon subsequent attack of shingles was well documented in Israel's documentation of CoViD vaccine administration with follow up effects. (Israel had almost universal application of CoViD vaccination treatment.)
AND it mirrored my own experience exactly. I had a well proven immunity to the varicella-zoster virus (herpes zoster) since early childhood. I was utterly stunned when I got a subsequent (mild) attack of 'shingles' following the standard dual CoViD mRNA vaccine treatment! I have been unable to think of a theory to comfortably explain the mRNA vaccine physically interfering with an immunity to a virus.
I am not a trained immunologist - like Dr. Fauci 😒 - but there are logical medical principles involved; they are either valid or they are flawed. That my 'shingles' attack might be a toxic reaction to vaccine components and not connected to a viral reaction simply did not cross my mind.
I had an unpleasant misunderstanding with a doctor in the wake of my 'shingles' attack... he might find this article of interest; it is like a whole new 'pathology'!
i.e.: a 'civil war' - which is exactly what the Dems want - they just don't want to be proven the 'responsible' party for that outcome! ❗
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
