One thing you can say about Mamdani is he is upfront about what he wants to do to NY City: Drive off the tax base, defund the police, keep ICE out of "his" city and allow the homeless to take over the free bus and subway system:
Posted on 11/02/2025 6:04:20 AM PST by MtnClimber
New York flirts with a familiar disaster as Zohran Mamdani rides Rousseauvian rhetoric toward the same ruinous script that doomed revolutions past.
As the world waits for New York’s first Islamo-Communist mayor—hailed alike by the overtly malicious and the terminally stupefied—it may be worth stepping back to ask what the advent of Zohran Mamdani, the pampered 34-year-old rich kid who was born in Uganda, tells us about the decay of liberalism.
In many ways, Mamdani—who, as I write this, is a comfortable 10-15 points ahead in the polls—is just the latest avatar of the AOC-Ilhan Omar wing of the Democratic party. He loves talking about (re)distributing the wealth of others, defunding the police, arresting Benjamin Netanyahu, and penalizing “landlords,” which last is just one of his many code words for Jews.
But haven’t you seen this play before? Don’t we know how it ends? Yes, we have, and yes, we do. It ends badly.
Remember the intoxication that greeted the French Revolution in 1789 or the Russian Revolution in 1917. At first, it was all “what bliss it was in that dawn to be alive.” But the bliss quickly soured and turned rancid.
Mamdani does not quote Jean-Jacques Rousseau. However, his utopian politics owe a great deal to Rousseau’s hothouse sentimentalities—and their more somber incarnation in the theories of his disciple Karl Marx. For more than two centuries, Rousseau’s mesmerizing rhetoric has provided despots of all kinds with a means of promoting conformity while ostensibly praising freedom. It is a neat trick. Words like “freedom” and “virtue” were ever on Rousseau’s lips.
But freedom for him was a chilly abstraction; it applied to mankind as an idea, not to individual men. “I think I know man,” Rousseau sadly observed near the end of his life, “but as for men, I know them not.” In the Confessions, he claimed to be “drunk on virtue.” And indeed, it turned out that “virtue” for Rousseau had nothing to do with acting in a certain way toward others. On the contrary, the criterion of virtue was his subjective feeling of goodness. For Rousseau, as for the countercultural radicals who followed him, “feeling good about yourself” was synonymous with moral rectitude. Actually behaving well was irrelevant if not, indeed, a sign of “inauthenticity” because it suggested a concern for conventional approval. Virtue in this Rousseauvian sense is scarcely distinguishable from moral intoxication.
Translated into the political sphere, Rousseau’s ideas about freedom and virtue are a recipe for totalitarianism. “Those who dare to undertake the institution of a people,” Rousseau wrote in The Social Contract, “must feel themselves capable, as it were, of changing human nature… of altering the constitution of man for the purpose of strengthening it.”
As the philosopher Roger Scruton observed in an essay on the French Revolution, “the revolutionary consciousness lives by abstract ideas and regards people as the material upon which to conduct its intellectual experiments.” Man is “born free,” Rousseau famously wrote, but is “everywhere in chains.” Alas, most men did not, according to him, truly understand the nature or extent of their servitude. It was his job to enlighten them—to force them, as he put it in one chilling epithet, to be free.
Such “freedom” is accomplished, Rousseau thought, by bringing individual wills into conformity with what he called the “general will”—surely one of the most tyrannical political principles ever enunciated. “If you would have the general will accomplished,” he wrote, “bring all the particular wills into conformity with it; in other words, as virtue is nothing more than this conformity of the particular wills, establish the reign of virtue.”
Establishing the reign of virtue is no easy task, as Rousseau’s avid disciple Maximilien Robespierre discovered to his chagrin. All those “particular wills”—i.e., individual men and women with diverse aims and desires—are so recalcitrant and ungrateful for one’s efforts to make them virtuous. Still, one does what one can to convince them to conform. And the guillotine, of course, is a great expedient.
Robespierre was no political philosopher, but he understood the nature of Rousseau’s idea of virtue with startling clarity, as he showed when he spoke of “virtue and its emanation, terror.” It is a remark worthy of Lenin and a grim foreshadowing of the Marxist-Leninist rhetoric that informed a great deal of radicalism since the 1960s.
I mention Rousseau here because, acknowledged or not, he is an important intellectual and moral grandfather of so much of the radicalism that speaks through political mouthpieces like Zohran Mamdani.
The Left loves Mamdani partly for what he says—free bus fare, no cops, and the endless extension of rent control. But they love him too for his manner and self-presentation. Like Barack Obama, he is a certifiable exotic: African, Muslim, and never too shy to weep when he recalls how mean (white) New Yorkers have been to people of his tribe. He said that his aunt was too scared to wear her hijab on the New York subway because of “Islamophobia,” but neglected to mention the 3000 New Yorkers who would not be riding any subway because they were killed on 9/11 by Muslim fanatics.
Here’s a prediction: Mamdani will, in short order, drive New York into the slough of economic and social immiseration that always follows the institution of socialist policies. The Mamdani candy dispenser will push the city toward bankruptcy. His “eat the rich” attitude will precipitate an aggressive flight of wealthy taxpayers, making the city’s economic prospects even more dire. Crime will soar, and in place of the broken-windows policing, the city will have an abundance of broken windows. As the anomie expands, Mamdani will need to find someone to blame. Whites in general will attract his notice, but Mamdani’s ill-concealed anti-Semitism will soon fix upon the Jews.
As I said, we’ve seen this movie before. It’s discouraging to think that we have to sit through yet another rerun.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
It won’t work this time either.
Some advice for leftists in NYC: Remember Huntingdon.
Democrats have worked for years importing illegals for the right time for them to bring the likes of Mamdani to power because they know how to control the ignorant third world imports.
Marxism on the march
Such will be the case with Mamadani's NYC. When the producers flee to freer, lower tax jurisdictions, it will be blamed on those more business friendly cities and states for providing them with a more attractive option. If only those producers could have been forced to stay in NY to be bled dry, it will be said, Mamadani's utopia would have been realized.
It means the rest of us can watch NYC burn.
Just look at Chicago or LA. They already have commie mayors.
I have little doubt you are right.
No matter what Mamdani says, it still spells out horse hockey to many of us. If New Yorkers don’t see it yet, they will if he is elected. To expect everything he says to work out is just not conceivable to any thinking person.
Han Gruber Damammi is going to build a #5 (fingered) Sockittumi Tower overlooking his new muzzie kingdom of the Big Camel Turd.
Oh, Gotham, if this is accurate...
Wall Street Apes
@WallStreetApes
New data shows illegals in New York are being paid more on SNAP food stamps than American citizens
Illegals receive 65% more money for food than American citizens
“The average American on SNAP and EBT gets about $7.59 per person per day to buy food. But the city of New York was handing out prepaid food debit cards to recently arrived migrants, many of whom were here without legal status, worth about $12.52 per person per day.
That means migrants in New York City shelters were receiving 65% more in daily food benefits than American families trying to get by in the exact same city.”
“The city doesn’t even give an extra food card for struggling citizens, to seniors on fixed incomes, to homeless veterans sleeping on the same streets. But show up yesterday without documentation, and you’re prioritized.
This isn’t about compassion, it’s about political choices. And those choices are telling you exactly where American citizens land on the priority list, which is dead last.”
9:23 PM · Nov 1, 2025 331.4K Views
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1984793541999280607
NYC has RCV for a reason.
“The Clash Of Civilization” guy? I will have to read up on him.
Then the heads start to roll and the killing goes on and on and finally a blood-soaked tyranny takes root.
I recommend reading Atlas Shrugged, it’s a primer for what’s to come in NYC, Chicago and other blue cities and states. Much of the rhetoric comes from Directive 10-289.
Orwellian....
One thing you can say about Mamdani is he is upfront about what he wants to do to NY City: Drive off the tax base, defund the police, keep ICE out of "his" city and allow the homeless to take over the free bus and subway system:
Communism isn’t really on the march now that Mamdani is for some unfathomable reason, popular. What IS on the march is Islam, cloaked in some perverse Socialist/Communist/Populist cloak.
Mamdami represents not Karl Marx but the Muslim Brotherhood. His real supporters are the Islamic Brotherhood (read Al Qaieda, HAMAS, Qatar, Iraq, Islamic Jihad, the PLO, the PALEOstinians, Hezbollah, Iran and the likes of Rev. Louis Farrakhan, Barack Obama and a host of extremists).
Bin Laden ghost will win and America will lose. What was started on 9/11 is now bearing fruit and Americans in New York are either clueless or seditious.
Good luck New York and watch how the amount of Mosques spread out everywhere. This is not just a religion, this is a war strategy. The Arabs say, “Schwhya, schwaya” or slowly but surely.
Has anyone plotted or tried to project Mamdanis likely course and possibilities in the real NYC political environment? Is the city council on board with him?
Communism or Islam or any other entity all have the same goal and will work with or help each other for the same goal.
However in the end they will battle each other to be the owner of it.
History repeats
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.