|
Posted on 10/31/2025 9:00:01 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
| Category | Justice | Question | Respondent | Reply Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major Questions Doctrine | Chief Justice Roberts | You dismissed... major questions doctrine... claimed source... never before used... for any product... any amount... misfit. | Sauer | Agrees major but conferred for emergencies; MQD doesn't fit foreign affairs/Article II; no "unheralded" (Nixon prior use, historical delegations). |
| Major Questions Doctrine | Justice Kavanaugh | For major question... does the specific authority... 'Unheralded'... understanding... 1977 vis-à-vis Nixon? | Sauer | Reenactment post-Nixon confirms; no unheralded trigger due to history. |
| Major Questions Doctrine | Justice Thomas | Why exactly the major question doctrine doesn't apply... to the President? | Sauer | Poor fit in foreign affairs (Article II inherent authority); Congress expects major crisis powers; statute designed broad, subject to oversight. |
| Separation of Powers | Chief Justice Roberts | Tariffs... taxes... core Congress... foreign-facing... trumps... neutralize powers. | Sauer | Tariffs regulatory (not revenue); costs on foreigners/contracts; mix empirically; regulates foreign commerce, distinct from taxing; inherent authority + delegation. |
| Separation of Powers | Chief Justice Roberts | Tariffs... taxes... foreign-facing... effective... separate? | Katyal | Agrees foreign implications (Federalist Papers) but Article I exclusive; no Article II in peacetime; emergencies require precision (Youngstown). |
| Separation of Powers | Justice Barrett | Congress... get this delegation back... veto-proof majority... hard time pulling... tariff power? | Sauer | Amendment needed (as with any interpretation); Congress terminated COVID emergency (2023, presidential assent); global threat justifies broad tariffs. |
| Separation of Powers | Justice Kavanaugh | Why... Presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama... not used IEEPA... tariffs... steel imports? | Sauer | Tariffs not natural for most emergencies; Nixon for balance-of-payments; fits here; Trump more tariff-friendly; no obvious unused cases. |
| Statutory Interpretation | Chief Justice Roberts | You've mentioned Dames & Moore three times... It said: Decisions... narrow... confine... narrowness... different provision... tariffs. | Sauer | Acknowledges narrowness but argues principles on sweeping language apply; "regulate" is capacious; viewed via Jackson's Youngstown framework. |
| Statutory Interpretation | Justice Alito | Bare statutory language: regulate importation... include imposition of a fee? | Katyal | Disputes revenue-raising fees/tariffs; fees capture costs (not revenue); tariffs always revenue-raising. |
| Statutory Interpretation | Justice Alito | CCPA said in Yoshida... comply with Section 122... not authorize 'fix rates... without regard'... Congress relied on those? | Sauer | Statements apply to other TWEA provisions not in IEEPA; Yoshida upheld tariffs under "regulate importation"; counters exclusion. |
| Statutory Interpretation | Justice Barrett | Point to any other place... 'regulate ... importation'... confer tariff-imposing authority? | Sauer | TWEA/Yoshida; Section 232 "adjust imports"; historical cases like Gibbons/Story. |
| Statutory Interpretation | Justice Kavanaugh | What's the significance of the Nixon example... real important to deciding this case? | Sauer | Nixon's 10% tariff upheld under "regulate"; Congress reenacted in IEEPA post-study. |
| Statutory Interpretation | Justice Thomas | Wouldn't... argument apply to embargoes? | Katyal | Embargoes stop shipments (not revenue); tariffs uniquely revenue-raising. |
I have very vivid dreams when I take melatonin. They’re so vivid, I’m not sure I’m asleep while I’m having them. I wake up rested though, so I must have been sleeping.
Katherine Stoeffel is an idiot.
Work your way up to 2.5 grams of flushing niacin/day.
__________________________________________
Why flush niacin? I have a family member who’s lost significant cognitive ability and a tremendous amount of muscle mass after being on statins for decades. He’d notice if someone gave him flush niacin but wouldn’t notice if he was given non-flush niacin. Are they interchangeable?
Non flush is niacinamide, not good. Numberone has the gouge.
Dashcam video of UPS plane crash in Louisville:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1206780571512505?mibextid=9drbnH&s=yWDuG2&fs=e
#1 will be with you shortly.
circle back for bitt’s alzheimer post
“Since Scott refused to try out Ivermectin and Mebedendazole, his more expensive and apparently difficult to obtain treatment will not be of much use for the general public.”
Not so much concerned about this particular treatment, as I am annoyed that you have to be famous to get high-level help to pressure the medical industry to allow you to try alternative (or additional) treatments.
Re Dementia:
That’s a very interesting article. ThankQ!
Write HHs and Trump yourself.
haven’t seen anything on this MAGA man allegedly killed by antifa???:
posting a couple links for information & discussion purposes only
*****************
Police ID 39-year-old killed in NE Portland shooting
Updated: Oct. 28, 2025, 5:21 p.m.|Published: Oct. 28, 2025, 5:09 p.m.
https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2025/10/police-id-39-year-old-killed-in-ne-portland-shooting.html
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Derrik M. Rice, age 39
https://gunmemorial.org/2025/10/27/derrik-m-rice
Um..I believe that would be the whole point.
Re Collapse:
Hhhmmm. Could the press be beaming something at them? Isn’t this the second time someone’s collapsed?
Re Q:
Wow! I miss Gaetz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
