Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Native American tribe snatches pilot's plane from him after he made emergency landing on their reservation
UK Daily Mail ^ | 10/31/2025 | WILKO MARTÍNEZ-CACHERO

Posted on 10/31/2025 1:45:41 PM PDT by DFG

A Native American tribe seized a Minnesota pilot's plane after he made an emergency landing on their land, citing a decades–old law the tribe claimed gave them control of the aircraft.

Darrin Smedsmo was flying over the Red Lake Indian Reservation when his single–engine Stinson airplane suddenly stopped working mid–air.

With less than three minutes until disaster, the experienced pilot was forced to land on a paved state road below.

Moments later, Smedsmo's plane was confiscated by tribal police, who claimed he did not have the authority to fly it over their reservation.

If he wants his plane back, he will have to suffer through a tribal trial – starting November 3.

'The land is theirs, but they are claiming the air is theirs,' Smedsmo told AIN. 'They don't control the air. That is basically untenable.'

The Roseau, Minnesota, native was traveling from his home city to Bemidji as his Stinson aircraft malfunctioned.

'Well, today was the day,' Smedsmo recalled on Facebook. '3500 [feet] and the engine made a little noise, [and] pretty soon no noise [at] all.'

'I don't know what happened, but the engine seized. I safely landed on the highway. Thankful,' he added.

A state worker who was also Smedsmo's neighbor came to his aid.

He helped remove the fallen plane from the road and called the tribal police for further help.

'Bad news,' a Red Lake officer said, apparently having spoken to tribal chief Darrell G. Seki, Sr. 'We're going to do what the chairman said.'

Smedsmo was told his plane had violated the tribe's 1978 law banning 'any airplane' from flying over Red Lake lands at less than 20,000 feet.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: chippewa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Flavious_Maximus

[So many of these native Indian “tribes” have become so co-mingled with White man’s blood that their are now very few pure bloods left anymore. You see them and they are pasty white, with whiter skin than Snow White, and often times have last names like Smith or Jones.]


Val Kilmer was the opposite of a full blood, but he was a vociferous advocate for Indian rights.


61 posted on 10/31/2025 3:56:02 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

It would take a Constitutional amendment. Indian sovereignty is recognized in the Constitution. Yes it’s outdated but it’s clearly there.


62 posted on 10/31/2025 4:00:13 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

I don’t think a Stinson will go to 20K feet. Maybe 7 or 8K.


63 posted on 10/31/2025 4:11:27 PM PDT by Clay Moore (My pistol identifies as a cordless hole punch. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reily
It would take a Constitutional amendment. Indian sovereignty is recognized in the Constitution. Yes it’s outdated but it’s clearly there.

Sure, just like the "right to privacy."

"The US Constitution does not specifically mention Native American sovereignty"

The United States can nullify a treaty through a combination of legislative and executive actions, though there is ongoing debate over the exact division of power. Congress can abrogate a treaty with a subsequent law, and the President can terminate a treaty through executive action, sometimes following terms in the treaty itself or international law. The Supreme Court has established that Congress has the power to pass a law that contradicts a treaty, making the treaty ineffective within the U.S. legal system
64 posted on 10/31/2025 4:25:02 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 ( The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Indian Tribes are specifically mentioned in two clauses in the main body and in the 14th Amendment.

Article I, Section 2: This section states that “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States ... excluding Indians not taxed.”

This clause reflects the status of Native Americans at the time the Constitution was written, indicating that they were not considered part of the American body politic and were not subject to taxation or representation

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Indian Commerce Clause): This clause grants Congress the power “to regulate Commerce with the Indian Tribes.”

This establishes a significant federal authority over tribal affairs, allowing Congress to enact laws that affect tribal governance and commerce.

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 2: This amendment modifies the earlier clause regarding representation, further clarifying the status of “Indians not taxed” in the apportionment of representatives

Also they are recognized to have “inherent sovereignty”.
Inherent Sovereignty: Native American tribes possess inherent sovereignty, meaning their authority to govern themselves predates the U.S. Constitution. This sovereignty is recognized and affirmed by the Constitution, allowing tribes to maintain their internal governance and legal systems.


65 posted on 10/31/2025 4:44:41 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Bring guns and plenty firewater. Heap big trade.


66 posted on 10/31/2025 5:05:51 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ThisLittleLightofMine

Exactly right. Let them have the choice of being a fully sovereign nation, with no voting rights in the USA, and no federal money, or joining the rest of us as citizens with allegiance only to this country.


67 posted on 10/31/2025 5:16:41 PM PDT by allblues (God is neither a Republican nor a Democrat but Satan is definitely a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Reily

They are like any other foreign power in that respect. The United States could make a treaty with Spain and cede territory. The United States could break that treaty. The United States could declare war with Mexico and take the Southwest.


68 posted on 10/31/2025 5:17:25 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 ( The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Clay Moore

On a good day. I once had a short ride in a Stinson, at gross weight or maybe more, on a very hot day. We managed to reach pattern altitude on the downwind. There was no attempt to continue the flight.


69 posted on 10/31/2025 5:23:14 PM PDT by allblues (God is neither a Republican nor a Democrat but Satan is definitely a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Except there’s this:

1. Federal Trust Relationship: The federal government has a trust responsibility to protect tribal sovereignty and interests. This relationship implies that the government must act in the best interests of tribes, providing a legal framework for their rights and governance.

2. Supreme Court Interpretations: Over the years, the Supreme Court has developed a body of law that defines the status of Indian tribes within the federal system. This includes recognizing tribes as distinct sovereign entities that operate within a limited sphere, separate from state and federal governments.


70 posted on 10/31/2025 5:35:51 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Well, I suppose this means no air ambulance services or emergency air transport for the Chippewas. Ever. If I were an insurance carrier for aircraft, I would add that restriction to all insurance policies in Minnesota in writing.


71 posted on 10/31/2025 6:02:20 PM PDT by Pennsyltucky Boy (bitterly clinging to our constitutional rights in PA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Supreme Court Interpretations

Spare us.
  1. Abortion,
  2. homosexual (pretend) marriage
  3. right to porn

72 posted on 10/31/2025 6:02:22 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 ( The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The faster we undo the legal fiction of separate territories of reservations and have feather Indians just be regular citi with no special rights. The better.


73 posted on 10/31/2025 6:11:48 PM PDT by Chickensoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

20k is pressurized only
Seems ridiculous


74 posted on 10/31/2025 6:12:23 PM PDT by wardaddy (If u hate Trump you’re stupid )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Could be. Lots of things look ridiculous until you see the agreement spelled out.

We shall see what happens.

75 posted on 10/31/2025 6:23:35 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Whatever!


76 posted on 10/31/2025 6:38:58 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

I suppose you think that the Japanese would have treated the aboriginals better. Fact- America was going to be conquered.


77 posted on 10/31/2025 6:44:20 PM PDT by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Strange that a man with his wealth would fhave to resort to prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: verum ago

They do not have sovereignty over that airspace.


78 posted on 10/31/2025 6:45:40 PM PDT by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dagunk

Been around a B-1 in low flight probably only once at low speed, but it was enough that I could probably verify the accuracy of your statement.


79 posted on 10/31/2025 7:35:15 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: allblues

The guy who I rented part of a hangar from had a nice Stinson with a larger than stock engine in it. Seems I remember him listing off several engines that had been approved with a STC that you could repower with.

I have heard tales of taking off into a stiff wind in a J3 Cub, getting altitude and grinding along for a half hour or so and looking out the back and still being able to see the runway.


80 posted on 10/31/2025 7:45:40 PM PDT by Clay Moore (My pistol identifies as a cordless hole punch. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson