Skip to comments.
Trump asks 9 colleges to commit to his political agenda and get favorable access to federal money
AP News ^
| 10:00 AM CDT, October 2, 2025
| AAMER MADHANI and COLLIN BINKLEY
Posted on 10/02/2025 10:32:58 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
How is it any different from Dims telling colleges they don't get climate research funding unless they produce the "right" results? Or they don't don't get any funding unless they let men in women's locker rooms?
But the AP article is written like this, if it's true anyway, is somehow a new thing from Trump.
2
posted on
10/02/2025 10:35:48 AM PDT
by
Tell It Right
(1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Have you noticed how often AP writers have names you would associate with the Mullahs?
3
posted on
10/02/2025 10:36:49 AM PDT
by
iamgalt
To: E. Pluribus Unum
More agitprop from Ass Press. They never give up.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They’ll either refuse, or agree, then undermine the program by renaming and hiding the offensive practices President Trump wants to eliminate. Better install an overseer in each school to make sure they don’t pull a fast one.
5
posted on
10/02/2025 10:42:09 AM PDT
by
Flaming Conservative
((Pray without ceasing)like he had it with him.)
To: Tell It Right
Capping tuition, limiting international enrollment, and protecting conservative ideology is crucial shift in higher education. By setting this precedent, schools and future presidential administrations can protect conservatism on campus.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Unfortunately that is just plain wrong. There should be no federal money (our money taken by the government) given to any educational institution or entity other than grade schools on military installations and no government money given or lent to anyone to attend any such. The schools should be put onto the market. Prices will go down. Revolutionary foolishness will disappear. Fake "research" will disappear. Couple that with elimination of all teachers' colleges and education will happen in the schools once again.
7
posted on
10/02/2025 10:49:16 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(|l covfeve l| )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why not create a government funded experimental program starting with 50 colleges/universities and have the experiment require a particular type of conservative education? Make it 12 year term and gauge the results in 2038.
No leftist ideology is permitted whatsoever.
8
posted on
10/02/2025 10:50:28 AM PDT
by
Racketeer
To: iamgalt
It is such that I question any claims made by AP, even if they sound good for conservatives. If what the reporter “reported” is correct thenTrumphs just taken a step to the left and the assertion that government as the source of all things.
9
posted on
10/02/2025 10:51:57 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(|l covfeve l| -)
To: arthurus
✔
10
posted on
10/02/2025 10:52:38 AM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: Tell It Right
I know. Let’s eliminate ALL such funding. Either that or he who pays the piper calls the tune.
11
posted on
10/02/2025 11:15:47 AM PDT
by
jimfree
(My 22 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than Joe Biden.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“The White House is asking nine major universities to commit to President Donald Trump’s political priorities in exchange for more favorable access to federal money.”
I will get blasted but if the above is an accurate take on what Trump has called for it raises serious First Amendment Concerns.
12
posted on
10/02/2025 11:23:54 AM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: lastchance
Doesn’t Trump have a right to administer this program?
13
posted on
10/02/2025 11:32:53 AM PDT
by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: E. Pluribus Unum

The authors.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They committed to Biden’s without question. To me, this is a slide back towards neutrality. We know they won’t allow diversity of ideas without being forced.
15
posted on
10/02/2025 11:48:41 AM PDT
by
Tacrolimus1mg
(Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Playing nice has rewards.
16
posted on
10/02/2025 11:53:18 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Oh please no.
How about no federal subsidies at all?
I mean unconditionally. And let them keep their agenda (presuming they can stay in business without the subsidies).
17
posted on
10/02/2025 12:35:03 PM PDT
by
Salman
(It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along.)
To: central_va
It’s not a question of his rights. He can certainly withhold funding (unless there is a legal reason such as Congressional appropriations) and he should. But making receiving the funding conditional on a university committing to his political agenda could be equated with censoring other political agendas. Which threatens their First Amendment right of Free Speech and Free Association.
If Biden had ever suggested that access to federal money was conditional on a college showing favor to his political agenda there would have been objections here.
Private grants can certainly be geared towards colleges or their programs which favor certain political agendas. Which what Trump should have told them after putting the plug on the federal money pipeline.
18
posted on
10/02/2025 12:48:30 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...
19
posted on
10/02/2025 3:17:13 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
To: Tell It Right
The compact, obtained Thursday by The Associated Press, asks universities to accept the government’s definition of gender and apply it to campus bathrooms, locker rooms and women’s sports teams. It asks colleges to stop considering race, gender and a wide range of other student demographics in the admissions process and to require undergraduate applicants to take the SAT or ACT.
How is it different? The above makes sense...
20
posted on
10/02/2025 7:47:53 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Charlie Kirk worried democrats would murder his children-no face pictures <P><I><B><big><center></B>)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson