He wants her gone because she is effective.
She’s a dope. Cracking down on hate speech ? Really?
Effective at what? What has she accomplished so far?
I don’t know what goes on behind the scenes, but sometimes I see Pam Bondi in front of a camera and find myself wondering if she or Kamala Harris is the dumbest lawyer in the U.S.
Do you want to list her accomplishments?
Could you name all the things she has done that make her great? Maybe I have missed something.
So far, almost a year in, no arrests of the people that are the fruit at the top of the tree.
I keep thinking any day now. Any day now.
She is?
Yes, she is doing good job.
She misspoke. Hate speech is constitutionally protected, but incendiary or seditious speech is not.
You can call somebody names, but you cannot call for killing somebody.
I am sure, that’s what she is going to prosecute!
Yes she slams the door in the lefts face with their BS.
but,
Walsh in this case is right. She stepped over the line, that’s the kinna bullcrap that can drain the energy out of a movement.
How do? Yesterday, she basically said she is ending the first amendment.
If the AG actually thinks we lock up people in this country for hurty words...
She needs to be fired.
That is how I see it. DOJ enforcement of discrimination cases is complaint driven. It could be argued that those businesses or more likely employees refusing to print pro Kirk posters are doing so because those requesting the poster are doing so for religious reasons. Discrimination based on religion is prohibited by federal law. DOJ would have grounds to investigate such a complaint.
But an unprotected class can not claim they were discriminated against just because the employee or business has a different view point about Kirk. There would be no grounds for DOJ to go after them.
Too funny. Just on this speech issue, her statements oppose the 1st Amendment. Is that OK with you? And pressuring a private business to kowtow? Are you a Conservative?
This is not even going back to so much that is questionable about her decisions from the beginning, nor does it consider her Fla manipulation of the Trevon Martin fiasco. And of course her special relationship with Suzie Wiles.
Politics is not a protected class. So, as tasteless as the refusal may be, there is no Constitutional reason for the DOJ to be involved. Seems like the AG of the US would understand that.
Now she wants to prosecute 'hate speech'?
Really? Speech that she doesn't agree with?
“He wants her gone because she is effective.”
She’s effective as a screen door on a submarine
She’s anti-2A and now is making anti-1A noises as well... A number of us were worried about her weak on Constitution views and she has done nothing to correct that.
She’s a perfect example of “the law is the law and f*ck the Constitution” attitude that is literally part of the problem with our FedGov.
Yeahhhh...nah.
Bondi effectively reaffirms dumb blonde jokes (is she a real blonde?)
Effective at not prosecuting the left and shielding elitist pedophiles. She’s in way over her head.