Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/27/2025 6:21:46 AM PDT by Racketeer
A groundbreaking study reveals racial bias in jury convictions, “When we break down this study we find that
- Black juries have a 12% conviction rate against black defendants, vs a 59% against whites. So that indicates that there is a 47% interracial bias when you have black jurors
- White juries have a 33% conviction rate against white defendants, vs a 26% against blacks, which actually demonstrates a negative 7% interracial bias
Meaning whites are more likely to convict their co-racial group than they are to convict somebody across racial lines
Whereas black juries have a 12% conviction rate against their own and a 59% conviction rate against white people
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The numbers in that study are horrifying and preclude the anticipated advances needed for a safe and secure society. I do wonder if this follows an historical model.
As long as democrats keep pushing “racism!” for votes, and the MSM goes along with the narrative, things won’t change.
Black Jurors explain the cities.
Ironically, that itself is a racist statement.
The only thing “groundbreaking“ about this study is that it was released. It was patently obvious at the time of the OJ trial that Black jurors were biased to the extreme for people who share their skin color and against everyone else. That’s not to say that other people aren’t prejudiced, but this is a fact - and it goes a long way toward explaining why so many inner city schitholes are, well, schitholes.
I have served on three juries--2 criminal and 1 civil. The first one was settled by a plea deal before it went to the jury. The second one, like the first one, had a black male defendant. I was an alternate for that one so was dismissed before the jury deliberated, but I knew one of the other jurors and he told me that a black woman juror was very strong for finding the defendant guilty.
The civil trial involved a black woman suing a company who had fired her, wanting back pay and punitive damages. The company had a black lawyer arguing their case. The jury only had 8 people--one of them a black man. We unanimously found against the claimant in 45 minutes.
Racism is alive and well in the US, just not in the way the Democrats and their media ass wipes would have everyone believe.
Basically, a water is wet study, anyone with 2 working brain cells already knew this.
Blacks as a culture is more racist and bigoted.
I don’t know if it’s true but I heard Singapore got rid of jury trials. Malays wouldn’t convict Malayans, Chinese wouldn’t convict Chinesians, Filipinos wouldn’t convict Filipinos, etc. Tribalism. The problem is not new in any case. The Simpson murder case was an example, certainly.
I have always heard a trial by Judge is the only way to go.
"I want the police to find out who killed my son! He was a good boy just mindin' his own business."
"But I ain't sending another black man to prison! There are already too many of them in jail!"
BTTT
Richard Pryor, “Thank God for prisons! “
Note the faggy DOJ sammich chucker was no-billed by a grand jury after assaulting a federal employee. Same principle I suppose.
My understanding is that, as a general rule, the voting behavior of individual jurors is confidential, and must not be disclosed publicly.
Sometimes, individual jurors sitting on high-profile court cases will come out after the trial and explain how and why they voted the way they did, but to my understanding, it would not be permitted for anyone to be "outed" without their explicit permission.
I thus cannot imagine any large-scale study examining possible racial bias - unless they examine only all-White vs. all-Black juries.
Regards,
In that case the defendant was accused of holding up a liquor store. The defendant's lawyer made a pathetic attempt to argue that all black men look the same to white people because the guy at the register was white--but the prosecution's main witness was a black woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.