From Rotten Tomatoes - if this is the movie, it appears to be popular and well-reviewed:
Posted on 08/19/2025 10:10:26 AM PDT by simpson96
The News: The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) is representing an Iowa parent with respect to a potential defamation lawsuit after she, a newly naturalized citizen from the Dominican Republic, spoke at a public school board meeting about her concerns regarding certain curricula and instructional materials used in her son’s classroom.
What Happened: Our client, Mrs. Elayne Casalins, first addressed her concerns about the curricula and instructional materials with her son’s teacher, the school principal and the superintendent. She went to the school board because no action was taken after she explained her concerns to the teacher, principal, and superintendent. She then spoke at a June 19, 2025, Belmond-Klemme Community School Board meeting to make objections to the instructional materials used in her son’s classroom and the lack of notice she was given as a parent.
She reported to the school board that a teacher made the students watch the PG-13 movie “Till” without any parental notice or consent — even though many students, including her son, were only 12 years old. She further reported that there was a discussion of Black Lives Matter, racism, and police brutality all without parental notification or consent.
Mrs. Casalins’s comments to the school board were intended to address three issues: (1) in her opinion the curricula she objected to violated Iowa state law (Iowa Code § 279.74), (2) she believed that she was denied her statutory right to object to the curricula and instructional materials, and (3) to object to the materials after the fact under School Board Policy 605.3, and to ask that their future use be reconsidered.
Following her comments, Mrs. Casalins received a threatening letter from Boles Witosky Stewart Law PLLC firm demanding that she “cease-and-desist” any public discussion regarding this matter of public concern, namely controversial curricula and instructional materials used at the Belmond-Klemme Community School. The letter was sent on behalf of the teacher employed by the school district.
Why WILL is Getting Involved: On behalf of Mrs. Casalins, we reject the legal arguments and demands made in the threat to sue her. We believe that the U.S Constitution and Iowa law protect her ability to petition her local school board regarding matters relating to her son’s education. As a parent, she has the right to direct the upbringing and education of her son.
Mrs. Casalins objected to the curricula taught and the instructional materials used in her son’s classroom and told the school board about her concerns. She has made no defamatory statement, and she will not refrain from continuing to object to the curricula and instructional materials she described in her presentation. She will continue to pursue her rights under the Iowa statutes and under School Board Policy 605.3.
The Quotes: WILL Education Counsel, Cory Brewer, stated, “Mrs. Casalins had and continues to have a First Amendment right, and the right under Iowa law, to speak on this critical subject and to petition her government (the school board) for relief. We think it is crucial for parents to be free to direct their children’s upbringing and education and not be prevented from doing so by threats of a claim for defamation.”
WILL Client, Elayne Casalins, stated, “As a new American citizen, I have constitutional rights that make this nation the envy of the world. There is no better place to live your life and raise a family, and we moved to Iowa to live in a state that upholds these fundamental American values. I was shocked to receive such a threatening letter from a law firm representing a public employee, my son’s teacher. But I will continue to tell my story and speak out for my son and the rights of parents across the country.”
We welcome new citizens who pay attention, get involved and watch out for their children.
We need more citizens like her. This smacks of covert DEI teaching! Showing Hollywood movies in class is not education.
Deprivation of rights under color of law should be prosecuted vigorously.
Good for her. Next step, pull your kids out of the crummy school and homeschool. That’s the (new) American way.
Awesome! Congratulations on your citizenship, Mrs. Casalins, and go get them! More power to you!
Yep. Most people just blindly accept evil.
Does anyone know what the movie “Till” is about? PG-13 to me means, it is more like an R rating.
Or another ‘next step’ - run for School Board!
From Rotten Tomatoes - if this is the movie, it appears to be popular and well-reviewed:
Racial discrimination by white people, that happened nearly a century ago. Designed to mold young minds into being second class citizens to blacks. To drive guilt into non blacks souls. Better subject matter for adults only, not children. I figured it out myself.
Oops! Forgot the reason for the post.
It appears to be a part of history in the US from a bereft Mom’s point of view with nationwide effects.
She was just the only one who kept pushing.
That’s Iowa!
Ms. Casalins is a Class Act.
She’s getting SLAPPed. A SLAPP is a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. I doubt the school board actually cares whether the potential suit has merit. They just want her to shut up.
Use propaganda to soften up the targeted groups with guilt and shame. That way, when it’s time to round them up and send them to the camps, they will go more willingly.
Lawsuit for Criticizing Curriculum at School Board Meeting
WE WILL NOT HAVE ANY OF THAT FREE SPEECH HERE CONRADE.
In other words, lawfare.
Are there bears in the Dominican republic?
You don’t know that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.