Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity. Did FDR ever brag about how long Social Security would last?
Free Republic.com ^ | August 15, 2025 | Nateman

Posted on 08/14/2025 3:15:31 PM PDT by Nateman

I seem to recall reading somewhere that FDR bragged about how long his Social Security program would last. I've been (so far) unable to find any of his quotes on this.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History
KEYWORDS: fdr; socilalism; vanity

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
I'm hoping the this very knowledgeable and self educated audience here could provide an answer that even Grok could not provide.
1 posted on 08/14/2025 3:15:31 PM PDT by Nateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nateman

I’m sure he expected it to be from here to eternity.


2 posted on 08/14/2025 3:17:43 PM PDT by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

I’m still getting my Social Security check and FDR has been dead a long time. Government programs don’t die easily. :-)


3 posted on 08/14/2025 3:19:03 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Since he was a socialist I would presume it was going to cure all ills forever.


4 posted on 08/14/2025 3:19:10 PM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

90 years as of today. Trump just signed a Social Security bill and mentioned that.


5 posted on 08/14/2025 3:20:35 PM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Claude.ai:

Searched for “FDR Franklin Roosevelt Social Security duration expectations how long last”

Let me fetch more specific information about FDR’s statements on Social Security’s duration.

Fetched: Presidential Statements

Based on the comprehensive record of FDR’s statements on Social Security, there’s no evidence that Roosevelt expected Social Security to last for only a specific limited duration. In fact, the historical record shows quite the opposite.

FDR described Social Security as “a cornerstone in a structure which is being built but is by no means complete” when he signed the act in 1935. He viewed it as a permanent foundation that would be built upon over time.

Roosevelt insisted that Social Security “should be funded by payroll taxes rather than from the general fund” [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt) to ensure its long-term sustainability. This design choice reflects his intention for the program to be self-sustaining and permanent.

Throughout his presidency, FDR consistently spoke of Social Security as an evolving, expanding program. In his 1939 message to Congress, he stated: “We shall make the most orderly progress if we look upon social security as a development toward a goal rather than a finished product” - language that suggests permanence and growth, not temporary duration.

Rather than setting an expiration date, Roosevelt repeatedly advocated for expanding Social Security coverage. He pushed for including more occupations and extending benefits, viewing the program as foundational to America’s economic security infrastructure.

The historical evidence suggests FDR envisioned Social Security as a permanent cornerstone of American social policy that would grow and adapt over time, not as a temporary program with a predetermined end date.

Citations:
- [Franklin D. Roosevelt - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt)

More sources:
- [FDR’s Statements on Social Security](https://www.ssa.gov/history/fdrstmts.html)
- [Why Did Franklin Roosevelt Create Social Security? | Free the Facts](https://www.freefacts.org/resources/why-did-franklin-roosevelt-create-social-security)
- [Social Security History](https://www.ssa.gov/history/briefhistory3.html)
- [Why Social Security Was the Cornerstone of FDR’s New Deal](https://www.history.com/articles/social-security-history-fdr-new-deal)
- [Social Welfare History Project FDR’s Statement on Signing the Social Security Act](https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/social-security/social-security-an-introduction/)
- [Social Security Act - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_Act)
- [Historical Thinking Matters: Social Security](https://historicalthinkingmatters.org/socialsecurity/1/sources/35/fulltext/)
- [FDR Signing 1935 Social Security Act](https://www.ssa.gov/history/fdrsign.html)
- [Franklin D. Roosevelt Signs the Social Security Act - White House Historical Association](https://www.whitehousehistory.org/photos/franklin-d-roosevelt-signs-the-social-security-act)


6 posted on 08/14/2025 3:20:46 PM PDT by Gman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Problems
FDR relied on in house “Economists”
Government always cooks the books

Planned Parenthood took off


7 posted on 08/14/2025 3:22:44 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Problems
FDR relied on in house “Economists”
Government always cooks the books

Planned Parenthood took off


8 posted on 08/14/2025 3:24:32 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Trump also got 275,000 illegals off SS. I sure thre are more to go.


9 posted on 08/14/2025 3:25:20 PM PDT by Cold Heart (Democrats protect criminals and prosecute innocents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

In 1940, the average life expectancy at birth in the United States was approximately 65 years.

Today, the average life expectancy at birth in the United States is approximately 80 years.

So there you go. FDR didn’t read things wrong. He just didn’t anticipate the advances in medicine and health care.

———

Disclaimer: Those life expectancy numbers vary all over the place depending on the source. But I think the point is made regardless.


10 posted on 08/14/2025 3:27:36 PM PDT by Leaning Right (It's morning in America. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
...cure all ills forever...

With the exception of Africa, all over the World birth rates are below replacement levels. I figure Governments are so messed up in Africa they can't depend on it for anything, much less a person's retirement. In Africa I figure your average person has kids so they not only help as soon as they can , but depend on them to help the parents when they are old and feeble. The West has the state now taking up the old person burden so much of the incentive for lots of kids is gone.

11 posted on 08/14/2025 3:28:26 PM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

“Trump also got 275,000 illegals off SS. I sure thre are more to go.”

The last time I had to go to an SSA office they had an entire army of translators on standby.


12 posted on 08/14/2025 3:28:53 PM PDT by dljordan (The Rewards of Tolerance are Treachery and Betrayal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Read the book: FDR’s Folly.


13 posted on 08/14/2025 3:30:02 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gman

That is pretty much what I also found. Thanks anyway for the post!


14 posted on 08/14/2025 3:30:25 PM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
How 'bout this: "Roosevelt later explained how the payroll taxes would help ensure Social Security’s long-term viability. 'Those taxes were never a matter of economics,' he said, according to [Jean Edward] Smith’s biography ["FDR," Random House, 2007]. 'They are politics all the way through. We put those payroll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and their unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my Social Security program.' " (I added the boldface. This block of text came from this substack post.
15 posted on 08/14/2025 3:30:53 PM PDT by Blurb2350 (posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
...Read the book: FDR’s Folly...

Since most historians are also collectivists they speak of FDR in glowing terms and generally place him near the top of the greatest Presidents. I place FDR near the bottom. In my search for quotes I came across this handy site with the dirt on FDR:

https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/fdr.html

16 posted on 08/14/2025 3:36:26 PM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blurb2350

I call Social Security a Ponzi scheme with guns.

The fancy political theory talk is just putting earrings on that pig.


17 posted on 08/14/2025 3:39:01 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Blurb2350

Thanks for that. I came across that same quote while I was looking. It sure implies he made a monster that would live forever and was damn proud of doing it.


18 posted on 08/14/2025 3:39:33 PM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gman

Great information! Thank you!


19 posted on 08/14/2025 3:39:47 PM PDT by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
...I call Social Security a Ponzi scheme with guns.

I signed up early. I figured get soon while I still can. It's amazing how the powers given to the Federal government have been expanded to include programs like this, almost as if the Constitution was made of putty and could be shaped into anything a liberal judge thought it should have said .

20 posted on 08/14/2025 3:44:19 PM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson