|
Posted on 06/30/2025 9:00:02 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Chicago, Illinois, is like a shining toy…...
Thought his family struggled during the time his mom was a working mother after the divorce.
Rhodes: The Illusion of Freedom
https://granitegrok.com/new-england/nh/2025/07/rhodes-the-illusion-of-freedom
Excerpt:
How Hyper‑Planning Defines Liberty in New Hampshire
I have come to realize that New Hampshire, far from being a bastion of freedom, is quietly becoming a textbook case of Charles Merriam’s vision of administrative progressivism. The technocratic restructuring of government that Merriam called for in the early twentieth century—replacing representative institutions with expert-driven administrative bodies—is no longer theoretical. In New Hampshire, it is happening right before our eyes.
Our elected officials see themselves as Committees of the Competent “legislating” us into freedom, bragging that “they are making life better” for the people of New Hampshire. That sure sounds like Progressive drivel to me, not something you would expect from the liberty-minded. It is a tragedy to watch the so-called “right” adopt the language of Democrats, but here we are. Do-gooders are in every camp. Free Staters, Republicans, Libertarians, Progressives, and Democrats share a common mental illness. That government is here to fix people’s lives.
I recently spoke on ”The Great Reset” in New Hampshire, and what I uncovered should alarm anyone who believes in limited government, local sovereignty, and the Declaration of Independence, which is America’s common creed and statement of values. What is true is that not a corner of the state is untouched by the influence of hyper‑planning. From regional councils to sustainability frameworks, New Hampshire has embraced a managerial model that is anything but constitutional.
The globalist web is woven deeply into our towns. ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability – is alive and well here. You will not hear it on the campaign trail, but its sustainability metrics, climate agendas, and equity frameworks are embedded in the documents produced by New Hampshire’s nine regional planning commissions and Local Development Districts, most of which are administered by the Northern Border Regional Commission (NBRC)
These Local Development Districts are not benign service providers, as many republicans believe. I was shouted down by one representative, being told that the Local Development Districts “have no power,” they are just advisors. Power is actual or implied, and their advisory role serves as a philosophical means of change. They serve as intermediaries for funneling federal dollars into local projects under the guise of economic development, bypassing any meaningful legislative debate or popular consent. Staffed by unelected “experts” and guided by a collectivist, central‑planning ideology, they mirror Merriam’s vision to a tee. They were created to replace the county government. One stage in the transformation of America from a nation-state government to a city state government. So you will have the State of Boston or the State of Chicago. This transformation is key to Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset model: a world managed by technocratic, transnational cities, where states and even nations become obsolete.
New Hampshire is highly reliant on federal grants. In that way, no matter the initial before your name, belief in this dependency makes you a Socialist. Dressing a bill up with stars and stripes means nothing. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it is a duck. Without Federal Grants, NH would be broken. “Without Federal Grants, NH would be broke. Cities like Nashua and Concord would likely collapse like a house of cards.” Entire town budgets, infrastructure projects, education programs, and climate initiatives depend on this money. Our fiscal lifeblood flows not from Granite Staters but from Washington—and by extension, international organizations and public‑private partnerships aligned with global governance goals.
.....These Local Development Districts are not benign service providers, as many republicans believe. I was shouted down by one representative, being told that the Local Development Districts “have no power,” they are just advisors. Power is actual or implied, and their advisory role serves as a philosophical means of change. They serve as intermediaries for funneling federal dollars into local projects under the guise of economic development, bypassing any meaningful legislative debate or popular consent. Staffed by unelected “experts” and guided by a collectivist, central‑planning ideology, they mirror Merriam’s vision to a tee. They were created to replace the county government. One stage in the transformation of America from a nation-state government to a city state government. So you will have the State of Boston or the State of Chicago. This transformation is key to Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset model: a world managed by technocratic, transnational cities, where states and even nations become obsolete.
New Hampshire is highly reliant on federal grants. In that way, no matter the initial before your name, belief in this dependency makes you a Socialist. Dressing a bill up with stars and stripes means nothing. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it is a duck. Without Federal Grants, NH would be broken. “Without Federal Grants, NH would be broke. Cities like Nashua and Concord would likely collapse like a house of cards.” Entire town budgets, infrastructure projects, education programs, and climate initiatives depend on this money. Our fiscal lifeblood flows not from Granite Staters but from Washington—and by extension, international organizations and public‑private partnerships aligned with global governance goals.
The puzzling part is that this hyper‑dependency is happening in a state with a robust Free State Project (FSP) presence—thousands of liberty-minded individuals who speak the language of freedom. Many serve on town budget committees or school boards. They champion tax cuts, constitutional carry, and school choice. Yet where is their pushback when regional bodies harness federal mandates to shape land use or force Agenda 2030‑style sustainability plans on New Hampshire towns?
The disconnect speaks to the central illusion I have uncovered: freedom is not measured by slogans or single-issue victories. If the roads, schools, broadband, and water systems are all shaped by federal or regional mandates, what true liberty remains?
Take Educational Freedom Accounts. Proponents promote them as a tool for parental choice, but these accounts are still routed and regulated through state and federal systems. That choice is a managed illusion, not a decentralization. It continues a reliance on a state-run financial pipeline that enshrines the government—not the individual—as gatekeeper of education. We can thank Americans for Prosperity and Valerie McDonnell and her Republican entourage for handing education back to the Feds.
We must ask ourselves: What is freedom in a system that cannot function without federal money? Is it freedom if local governance is mere execution of a federal agenda? If liberty-minded individuals only rearrange policy outcomes without addressing the structures underpinning them, what are we actually preserving?
Charles Merriam, Woodrow Wilson, and other architects of the administrative state made this clear: government structure is ideology in action. Change the structure and the values follow. New Hampshire towns, full of people who call themselves conservative or libertarian, now function more like arms of federal agencies. Until liberty advocates confront the Structure—not just the policies—liberty remains cosmetic. We risk becoming another willing participant in a globalist order we never truly resisted.
He lived with his dad after the divorce and at 17 moved to Canada due to not getting along with his father.
The Miracle Mile is anything but nowadays.
heartless scammer preying on grandparents finally arrested
https://nypost.com/2025/07/05/us-news/ringleader-of-a-30-million-dollar-grandparent-scam-arrested/
Crawford State Park, Crawford, Colorado
A new internal Trump DOJ/FBI memo concluded there is no evidence Jeffrey Epstein had a client list, was m*rdered instead of committing su*cide, or blackmailed power figures, Axios claims.
The administration is supposedly to release a video showing nobody entered the area of the prison where Epstein died.
https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1942027900359721247
FIRE BONDI! FIRE PATEL! FIRE BONGINO!
I'm not a fan but kept quiet about my thoughts on him because I thought he was a valued ally, until recently.
I know people who were taken in with scams like this. It took forever for them to get their identities and money back.
That is so sad to be taken like that!!
My bad put duplicate paragraphs in here.....
I am 188% sure that Elons’ feud with Trump is pure showmanship, for a reason. It’s ultra theatrical. and they’ve been working together for a long time.
Good to hear your sister is improving :)
That’s a possibility. Guess we’ll just have to watch it play out.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/01/2025 Vol.509, Q Day 2803, grey_whiskers wrote: What to make of this? BREAKING: DOJ and FBI have concluded that there is no evidence that Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed powerful figures, kept a “client list” or was m-rdered, per memo.— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) July 7, 2025
Carrot and/or stick? Whose carrot and/or whose stick?
Those on Epstein's client list could, for example, offer the locations and release of kidnapped victims all over the world, 'Or arrest me, and they die slowly where they are...."
Combinations of incentives and threats? Those on Epstein's list are guilty of multiple crimes; they live lives of malevolent evil; we might swap this one in exchange for the release of victims (particularly children), knowing we have so much dirt on the players that we can 'pick them up later.' Hillary, Obama, Bill etc. - these horrors are not the extent of their crimes. They have tormented entire nations, generation in some cases.
In the past, I've noted that the Ukraine 'heats up' toward WWIII whenever Epstein is mentioned. It's strangely quiet now. Stick's (Threats) in place? Carrot(s) offered to prevent WWIII? The calculations are meant to save as many innocent lives as possible. Those who know, cannot sleep, so they don't give up on Justice - they go after it in other ways. The Deep State expects to win before 'other ways' catch up to them.
If you have men who will exclude any of God's creatures
from the shelter of compassion and pity,
you will have men who will deal likewise
with their fellow men.
Francis of Assisi
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
