Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sources claim Meghan Markle wasn't pregnant and was wearing a 'moonbump' in controversial viral video of her twerking with Harry
Marca ^ | June 6, 2025 | TBS

Posted on 06/06/2025 6:45:53 PM PDT by DoodleBob

Meghan Markle's heartfelt celebration of her daughter Lilibet's fourth birthday has taken an unexpected turn, with critics on social media using it to fuel a wave of conspiracy theories.

The Duchess of Sussex posted a throwback video of herself dancing-at nine months pregnant-in a hospital room, recalling the moments before her daughter was born. But what was meant as a playful tribute has been twisted by online skeptics into a platform for baseless claims.

In the clip, Meghan, wearing casual clothes and visibly pregnant, dances enthusiastically to Starrkeisha's "Baby Mama" song. Prince Harry briefly appears before Meghan begins twerking and moving playfully around the hospital room.

But the lighthearted post quickly drew scrutiny. A vocal group of critics on X (formerly Twitter) began dissecting the footage and offering outlandish theories-ranging from claims that Meghan was never pregnant to accusations that the hospital setting was staged or digitally fabricated.

According to some online users, Meghan's pregnancy "bump" appeared too high, too firm, or moved "unnaturally," prompting accusations she wore a prosthetic belly or "moonbump."

A few even claimed the video was filmed on a set or generated using AI. Others pointed to details like Meghan wearing jewelry or lacking an IV drip, saying it was inconsistent with what they would expect in a labor ward.

One user claiming to be a nurse insisted she should have had a cannula in her hand, while another commented that her dancing ability at nine months was "superhuman." No medical experts have supported these assertions, and the Sussexes have not commented publicly on the speculation.

Critics also revisited long-standing surrogate rumors, basing them on equipment in the video and Meghan's clothing. Childish annotations were added to screenshots of the video by conspiracy-minded users attempting to highlight so-called "inconsistencies."

(Excerpt) Read more at marca.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Society
KEYWORDS: baby; markle; meghan; meghanmarkle; moonbump; princeharry; sussex; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Republican Wildcat
The supposed daughter, was NEVER taken to ANYONE in the Royal family to see!

Queen Elizabeth II NEVER visited Frogmore Cottage and "Lilly" was NEVER taken to see the Queen, Prince Phillip, the now King Charles, Queen Camilla, The Princes and Princess of Wales...William and Catherine, nor Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis!

Absolutely NOBODY at all, in any way, shape, manner of form, related to Harry has EVER seen Lilly in person!

41 posted on 06/06/2025 8:10:26 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All

This is disgusting. It’s cultural appropriation is what it is. I have one of those “moon bumps” but most people call it a beer belly. And I didn’t use a prosthetic either. I got mine the old fashioned way.


42 posted on 06/06/2025 8:12:29 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I worked at the circus as The Human Cannonball, until they fired me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Berosus
Nope, Harry renounced NOTHING at all, except doing his duty to the Crown!

He and Sparkles were forbidden, by Queen Elizabeth II, from using HRH, which Meggsy baby is now doing anyway.

43 posted on 06/06/2025 8:12:54 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

They are a cute couple.

But like Taylor Swift, Blake Lively, Jay Z and others…they seek to control the media, and play the PR narrative game to suit them at any cost, even if it means burying truths or censoring/taking others down who don’t abide by their rules…

So there is a viciousness to it all… But to their credit, they grabbed the reins of the media machine — whereas more vulnerable souls like Michael Jackson, Britney Spears et al. were eventually destroyed by it…


44 posted on 06/06/2025 8:43:27 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Thank how does she explain the batboy born shortly after?

https://www.google.com/search?q=images+weekly+world+news+batboy&sca_esv=9436697198651bfc&udm=2&biw=1052&bih=482&ei=FrdDaKqBNKS3ptQPy9SuwQw&ved=0ahUKEwiq5OGDt


45 posted on 06/06/2025 8:51:42 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

“Starrkeisha’s “Baby Mama” song”

Trash culture.


46 posted on 06/06/2025 8:53:39 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

Then how does she explain....


47 posted on 06/06/2025 8:56:03 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I believe you but did you find this information all in one place? or this was pieced together?

I have a story about her & her father
re the wedding. He was due to come to London to be fitted, etc... All those arrangements were made by palace staff- hotel, travel, etc...Markle told palace staff she would handle everything about him coming to the UK to be in her wedding.
She then called a paparrazi to film him surreptiously , told him to get measured by a tailor. He was filmed, the pics were printed and then she sent him a letter roughly telling him he had shamed her, he shouldnt have gone to the tailor in Mexico where he lived and because these pics were printed “ for all the world to see (” my privacy has been invaded ) he was now barred from her wedding.

this gave him the heart attack.

Markle never even mailed him the invite she took it out of palace hands and she would do it and NEVER did


48 posted on 06/06/2025 8:56:38 PM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (DONT DRINK & DRONE 🤓 HAVE A NICE DAY 😀 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Same as in Rosemary’s Baby for a long time. Excuses made.
Then “he has his father’s eyes.”


49 posted on 06/06/2025 8:57:40 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

ell, hell, Katie Couric released video of her colonoscopy, so why Not?


50 posted on 06/06/2025 9:06:00 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Your oath of enlistment has no expiration date)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thesligoduffyflynns
Oh I do know all that you wrote about; I've followed this story from the start.

She's even worse than that! She told her niece ( her 1/2 sister's daughter ), after she had invited her to the wedding, that the Queen would NOT allow the niece to come. It was ALL a lie!

She also did NOT invite any member of her mother's family, nor her father's brother, who pulled all kinds of strings to get her a brief internship, at an American Council, is some South American country ( which she was fired from, because she did NO work ), when she was in college.

Old Sparkles is a liar, a vicious spoiled brat, and a gigantic manipulative narcissist, and always has been a horrible person.

51 posted on 06/06/2025 9:06:08 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: thesligoduffyflynns
Find WHAT all in one place?

Just watch the video and ask any woman you know, who has EVER had a baby, or a nurse or an OBGYN, or a man whose wife had a child/children.

52 posted on 06/06/2025 9:08:43 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Many Old School (before the internet) Talk Show Hosts seemed to have incredibly huge egos. Brian Gumble quickly comes to mind, followed by “Saint” Jane Pauly and on a lower tier,
here’s Katie, with one of her vaguely mocking smiles.


53 posted on 06/06/2025 9:11:01 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger
LOL...how true!

Actually, ROSEMARY'S BABY was a better book than the film; however, the film was GREAT; it just changed which building they lived in and omitted a couple of small things.

54 posted on 06/06/2025 9:11:07 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

A case where the devil’s in the details?


55 posted on 06/06/2025 9:16:09 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I saw the entire uncut engagement interview from 1sec.to end
First, she mocked the interviewer
and of course it eventually ends , at that the camera is still running and she sits there and looks into and begins practicing micro expressions, suddenly Haz realizes the camera is running and he clears his throat and then sits up and it ends.
A lot was cut out of that, too...

I smh wondering what sort of creature go s thru life as she does.

And she disrespected HM! who in world ???

Karma will catch up to her, though. evetything in the dark will be brought to light, just as the Good Book says


56 posted on 06/06/2025 9:17:32 PM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (DONT DRINK & DRONE 🤓 HAVE A NICE DAY 😀 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I saw the entire uncut engagement interview from 1sec.to end
First, she mocked the interviewer
and of course it eventually ends , at that the camera is still running and she sits there and looks into and begins practicing micro expressions, suddenly Haz realizes the camera is running and he clears his throat and then sits up and it ends.
A lot was cut out of that, too...

I smh wondering what sort of creature go s thru life as she does.

And she disrespected HM! who in world ???

Karma will catch up to her, though. evetything in the dark will be brought to light, just as the Good Book says


57 posted on 06/06/2025 9:17:39 PM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (DONT DRINK & DRONE 🤓 HAVE A NICE DAY 😀 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I saw the entire uncut engagement interview from 1sec.to end
First, she mocked the interviewer
and of course it eventually ends , at that the camera is still running and she sits there and looks into and begins practicing micro expressions, suddenly Haz realizes the camera is running and he clears his throat and then sits up and it ends.
A lot was cut out of that, too...

I smh wondering what sort of creature go s thru life as she does.

And she disrespected HM! who in world ???

Karma will catch up to her, though. evetything in the dark will be brought to light, just as the Good Book says


58 posted on 06/06/2025 9:17:46 PM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (DONT DRINK & DRONE 🤓 HAVE A NICE DAY 😀 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: thesligoduffyflynns
Ooooooooooooooopppppppppsssssssssssss...you mean about the Queen and Lilly. SORRY!

I watch three different YouTube creators, one of whom is a well known authoress and an Aristo, by marriage, who knows EVERYONE, and they ALL say the same thing about NO Royals, of any kind kind at all, EVERY having met or even seen Lilly.

And the ONLY time that anyone saw/met Archie, is when he was Christened.

Lady Collin Campbell, the Aristo authoress, has written definative books about Lady Di, as TWO about Harry and Meggsy baby. All of which I have read, as well as having watched her videos for years now and shall be watching her next one, tomorrow; as usual. :-) She DOES talk about all kinds of other things and people too, and is always very interesting.

59 posted on 06/06/2025 9:18:20 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

BRAVO...very clever and spot on! ;^)


60 posted on 06/06/2025 9:19:29 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson