|
Posted on 05/31/2025 9:28:08 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Those boys ain’t girls.
I gotta wonder where the Koreans are? Remember during the last LA riots it was the local Koreans who put rifles on their roofs and armed up in front of their buildings/businesses. They had zero problems. Maybe there’s a certain amount of Ritenour fear that’s keeping the local folks from kicking the buttz off a bunch of brick flingers?
Funny how this stuff never happens in my ‘hood. Seems like I get screwed out of the fun?
I think these dickheads are going after ICE and Fed buildings instead of general mayhem. If they move on like the RK protestors did, perhaps the Korean-American militia will show.
Both.
Participants in the Fagatelle . . .
.
1, 3 and 4 are viable under strict constructionism because
1- without benefits the only people that would come would be ambitious go getters or people already financially self sufficient.
3 - Again, without benefits this is a self correcting problem. Private charities can make themselves feel good saving stumblebums but otherwise if you can’t handle your mind altering substances and end up dead in the gutter you’re at least a “teachable moment” for others... Likewise if you get beaten or offed for thieving due to same.
4 - Again, self correcting. Operating outside of the norms of Christian western civilization is so physiologically hazardous that the ONLY way commercial licentiousness can propagate is by the subsidized treatment of the resulting negative consequences. If you are gonna go pay for some biological spelunking you better be prepared to lay out the cash to make the rash/sores go away and if it’s incurable get your estate in order.
2 - is such a ridiculous position to stand on as a political point that if true I’d conclude that the “Founder” was actually a 3 letter agency construct/plant deliberately stood up to deter citizens from exploring philosophies of folks like Rand and Hayack, et.al. Both components of that statement depend upon the exposure/exploitation of people who ARE NOT OF AGE-OF-MAJORITY OR ABLE TO ENTER INTO BINDING LEGAL CONTRACTS. This is the same territory (and possibly the same “powers”) that are pursuing all this kid transitioning crap... Obviously “by their fruits we should know them” (and respond accordingly).
Abortion comes into the same level of inane antilogic BS as this. If you are going to reap the rewards of the Constitutional Republic you CAN NOT predicate the “liberty” of one person over the right to exist of another. Thank God we have the technological validation of in-utero human development, but under any reasonable legal interpretation of the law up to the late 20th century one has to give the conceived child the benefit of the doubt so to speak for determining that this under-construction human can be “sentenced to death”.
HEAR HEAR!
Jose, don’t lose that number...
X22 6.10.25: Did Trump Force The [DS] To Move Up Their Timeline? When Will Trump Call The Ball?- Ep. 3662
I hope this isn't freeqssplaing, but the very most important thing to know about statistics IMO, is the concept of randomness. If the data collected is not from a randomized sampling then the results MUST be categorized.
So for instance if I do a study on let's say "people who like dogs". I call 1000 random numbers and 700 people respond and of those 700 people 350 say they like dogs. So I publish a study that says "Recent darbymcgill poll determines 50% of people like dogs".
Number 1, without checking I'm sure a random sample size of 700 is way more than enough to have a 95% confidence level in the accuracy of the results being within +/- 5 standard deviations. (I got some brain fog going on and I'm too lazy to look it up, so don't quote me).
That sounds all well and good but to be totally honest I'd need to make some qualifications in my published results. For instance, I only polled people who might have a phone and those numbers I chose, might have only been called using a USA telephone number format, plus I might have randomly chosen invalid phone numbers altogether and some of those who answered chose not to respond. (there's probably others, but hopefully I made my point).
My study might have published something like "1000 random numbers dialed, 700 Americans, who have phones and chose to take the survey responded, half of them like dogs"
I loved statistics way back when and I've proved many corporate studies invalid because of the "pick and chose" method of selecting samples. But I had a professor that once told me, "there's liars, there's damn liars, and then, there's statisticians".
Speaking of responsibility, I want to draw your attention to the Statue of Responsibility. The Statue of Responsibility was conceived by Viktor Frankl, three-time concentration camp survivor and author of Man's Search for Meaning. Frankl declared that freedom without responsibility is anarchy. He proposed the installation of a Statue of Responsibility on the West Coast to balance the Statue of Liberty on the East Coast.
Steven Covey, the "7 Habits" guy, promised Frankl that he would make it happen. After Frankl passed, Covey asked sculptor Gary Lee Price to create a design for the Statue, and Gary's design was approved by Frankl's widow. For two decades since, Gary and the Statue of Responsibility Foundation have been trying to find a suitable and receptive location for a 305-foot version of the Statue (a smidgen shorter than the Statue of Liberty).
Frankl wanted it to be on the California coast, but California was not hospitable. A year and a half ago, Utah seemed receptive to a proposal to locate the Statue on the site of a former state prison -- even the governor strongly supported it. But then that effort was bogged down by protests and politics. Since the California fires, however, California interest in the Statue seems to have picked up, and it's entirely possible that it will end up in the San Diego area.
Last week I got to attend the unveiling of a 15-foot version of the statue at San Diego's Alliant International University, where Viktor Frankl taught for two decades. I was inspired!
You might need if you’re in fetters when you get home....
Nice.
Waters? Well, yeah, black, rassiss guards, and the worst hair rag since Kramer. She should be ‘rested just for that fake ball of wig.
gisd O
You know, people can flood that number with calls, kind of a DDS over the proverbial twisted pair (old school phone wires).
Side not - and I’m not sure this link will work, but I believe this is the Bagster-approved Allie and friends, singing some Stevie Wonder (the guitarist is exceptionally good IMHO)...
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1919185801896326
SCOOP:
Walmart to release a statement tonight condemning violence after Walmart heiress Christy Walton took out an ad promoting the June 14th anti-Trump “No Kings” protest in the @nytimes.
I was able to get to this ad that was published by Walmart heiress Christy Walton in front of @Walmart’s executives today. I explained to them and their representatives the need to condemn the actions of Christy and her ad that is promoting radical leftist protests in the US by inciting violence against @realDonaldTrump.
@Walmart will be releasing the statement below in the next hour. I have been given the statement ahead of time by Walmart’s executives.
🚨 Walmart Statement 🚨
“We condemn violence, including when it’s directed towards law enforcement, and the damaging of property. As a company with associates and customers in the Los Angeles region, we remain focused on their safety and that of impacted associates. The advertisements from Christy Walton are in no way connected to or endorsed by Walmart. She does not serve on the board or play any role in decision making at Walmart.”
I’d like to add that Walmart was very receptive when their executives were contacted with my concerns and they didn’t push back when I said a statement would need to be made TODAY.
I am glad Walmart took this opportunity to distance themselves from Christy Walton’s anti-Trump multi-city ad and to condemn political violence.
https://t.co/a0Wp2Po6Fn pic.twitter.com/pvWSTtBrNU— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) June 10, 2025
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
