It was true family separation and the Democrats rightfully received a lot of criticism.
After this incident, Democrats wanted unlimited migration into the United States.
Posted on 05/09/2025 5:36:52 AM PDT by dennisw
Ussa Polania was booked at Seminole County Jail on May 2 for charges related to petty theft with an estimated value between $100 and $750, according to Frances Matos in the booking department at Seminole County Jail and an arrest report from the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office
"This is un-American to try to force or coerce someone to get tired and voluntarily sign the death penalty, technically … she faces a horrible, horrible fate if she goes back to wherever she came from."
Filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus means Ussa Polania alleges her detention “goes against the Constitution, and for that reason, [she] should be released immediately,” said Nicole Whitaker, founder and managing attorney at Whitaker Legal, an immigration law firm in Maryland.
Whitaker and Diaz reviewed Ussa Polania’s filing, shared by Raw Story. Neither is representing Ussa Polania.
“In my opinion, she's not being treated fairly, but she's being treated just like everybody else is being treated, which is they don't care that she just had a child,” said Diaz, managing partner at Your Immigration Attorney. "Even then, the likelihood of success is very small.”
Ussa Polania is currently more than 100 miles away from Seminole County Jail in Sanford, Fla., where she was first held. Her last known whereabouts is now Pinellas County Jail in Clearwater, Fla, according to a database from the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office and and the online detainee locator system from ICE.
In her petition, Ussa Polania said she faces “imminent transfer to Texas.”
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
“”This is un-American to try to force or coerce someone to get tired and voluntarily sign the death penalty, technically … she faces a horrible, horrible fate if she goes back to wherever she came from.””
Then maybe don’t be a thief
Sounds like she already has several family members here.
“Just having a baby” sure didn’t keep her from committing a crime..
Get out. Take your children with you.
It seems as is she really got her tit caught in a wringer..:
Florida leads the Nation in cooperating with Federal law enforcement! All illegals encountered by Florida LEOs are held for ICE! Florida Highway Patrol Officers are authorized to exercise immigration enforcement by the Feds! Most PDs and Sheriffs do so as well in a less formal way.
this is how I read the headline...
Mom of US breastfeeding citizen (the baby) sues Kristi Noem after (the other breast) grabbed by ICE
It was true family separation and the Democrats rightfully received a lot of criticism.
After this incident, Democrats wanted unlimited migration into the United States.
Get out, you criminal! You are here illegally. Deport this loser...and her child(ren).
Oh boo freaking boo.🖕🏼
born...naturalized
past tense
The first sentence of AMENDMENT XIV is only retroactive as of the time of its adoption.
“from the text of the Constitution, it is clear”
“, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” is clear.
We don't need anymore stupid people in this country. We've got plenty of our own already as it is.
Send her home. This is what I voted for.
The first sentence of AMENDMENT XIV was not intended to change the law regarding citizenship.
It was only to make it crystal clear that the freed Afro-Americans were citizens as they would have been if there wasn’t racism.
AMENDMENT XIV, SECTION 1 was to make it crystal clear that the freed Afro-Americans were fully citizens and to be treated as such.
The due process requirement was also clearly extended to the states in furtherance of that.
Exactly.
Before she earned her citizenship, my wife was a lawful green card holder and we both knew the rules. "Do not under any circumstances break the law or you can be deported."
So, she didn't, --which was really difficult to do in the first place because my wife had no desire to steal stuff, or drive drunk, or engage in fraud, or whatever.
People who come over here illegally and then steal, WE DON'T WANT YOU HERE! GTFO!
Agreed—but it also made clear whom it didn’t apply to.
“’, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’ is clear”
There was a debate because the text was not clear. Senators made conflicting claims during the debate.
It is clear in context. Those ignoring that are trying to upend the country.
Amendments were to be for the purpose of fixing defects, not creating them.
Which is what this amendment did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.