Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Uncover New Details About Yellowstone’s Supervolcano as Magma Chamber Sits Just 2.3 Miles Below Surface
Discern Report ^ | April 18, 2025 | Staff

Posted on 04/18/2025 11:24:03 AM PDT by Red Badger

* Yellowstone’s upper magma chamber is just 2.3 miles deep, closer than previously thought, raising new questions about eruption risks.

* Scientists used advanced seismic imaging to map the magma system, revealing a silica-rich upper chamber and a larger basalt reservoir below.

* Volatile gases venting naturally reduce pressure but don’t eliminate the long-term threat of a catastrophic eruption.

* Past supereruptions reshaped landscapes and altered global climates — the last one was 640,000 years ago.

* NASA’s controversial plan to cool the magma via drilling carries risks and would take millennia to show effects.

**********************************************************************

Yellowstone National Park, home to breathtaking geysers and hot springs, sits atop one of the world’s most dangerous natural threats: a simmering supervolcano capable of global devastation. New research reveals that the upper edge of its massive magma chamber lies just 2.3 miles beneath Earth’s surface, closer than previously documented. While scientists stress an eruption is not impending, the findings sharpen understanding of the volcano’s structure and underscore the need for vigilance.

For decades, experts have monitored Yellowstone’s volcanic system, a geologic powerhouse fueled by a sprawling magma reservoir spanning 55 by 30 miles. Though the volcano hasn’t erupted in 640,000 years, its catastrophic potential — including ash clouds that could plunge global temperatures — keeps researchers alert. Now, using advanced seismic imaging, a team has mapped the magma chamber’s boundaries and composition with unprecedented precision.

Mapping the magma

The study, published in Nature, employed hundreds of portable and truck-mounted seismometers to generate 2D images of the subterranean landscape. By analyzing artificial seismic waves, scientists determined the upper magma chamber consists largely of rhyolite, a silica-rich volcanic rock. The chamber’s uppermost portion is 86% solid rock, with the remaining 14% comprising pore spaces filled with molten material, gases, and liquids.

Beneath this chamber lies an even larger magma reservoir, first identified in a 2015 University of Utah study. This lower reservoir, stretching 12 to 28 miles underground, contains low-silica basalt and dwarfs the upper chamber in volume. Researchers say the interaction between these two reservoirs drives Yellowstone’s famed geothermal activity and could influence future eruptions.

Crucially, the team found that volatile gases like sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide, which accumulate at the magma chamber’s top, often escape through surface fissures, reducing pressure buildup. “If there’s a channel, they can escape to the surface,” said University of Utah geophysicist Fan-Chi Lin, a study co-author. This natural venting process may help delay explosive eruptions, though it doesn’t eliminate the long-term risk.

A history of devastation

Yellowstone’s past eruptions paint a grim picture. Three supereruptions occurred 2.1 million, 1.3 million, and 640,000 years ago, each expelling enough material to reshape landscapes and alter climates. The most recent blast blanketed much of North America in ash and left behind the Yellowstone Caldera, a 43-by-28-mile depression. Smaller eruptions followed as recently as 70,000 years ago.

While the new study confirms the magma system remains active, researchers emphasize no eruption is imminent. However, the proximity of the upper chamber to the surface raises questions about how quickly pressure could escalate. “[We now] understand more about the heat engine powering Yellowstone and about how melt is distributed,” said USGS geophysicist Mike Poland. “That can have ramifications for how we perceive the volcanic hazard.”

The challenge of preparedness

Despite reassurances, preparation remains critical. A full-scale eruption could eject molten rock 40 miles outward, incinerating everything within a 50-mile radius. Pyroclastic flows — deadly avalanches of superheated gas and debris — would compound destruction. Meanwhile, ashfall could smother crops and cripple infrastructure across the U.S., with millimeter-thick deposits reaching as far as Miami or Los Angeles.

NASA has even proposed a controversial $3.46 billion plan to drill into the volcano and pump water through its magma chambers, theoretically reducing eruption risks by cooling the system. Yet experts caution such efforts could inadvertently trigger disasters. “Drilling into the top of the magma chamber would be very risky,” researchers noted, adding that the process could take millennia to yield measurable cooling.

For now, monitoring continues. Seismic networks track underground shifts, while Yellowstone Volcano Observatory scientists analyze gas emissions and ground deformation. The recent discovery of a new hydrothermal vent near Nymph Lake—a small but notable geothermal event — highlights the system’s dynamism.

Though Yellowstone’s next supereruption might lie thousands of years in the future, its geologic restlessness ensures it remains a focal point for science — and a reminder of nature’s devastating power. Although the new research offers some helpful clues to inform forecasts, the planet’s largest active volcano still holds mysteries beneath its serene facade.


TOPICS: History; Outdoors; Travel; Weather
KEYWORDS: doctorevil; eruption; eruptions; magma; ohnoz; volcano; volcanoes; yellowstone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Drill into the magma chamber???

What could possibly go wrong?.....................

1 posted on 04/18/2025 11:24:03 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Don’t Drill, Baby, Don’t Drill! PINGGG!................


2 posted on 04/18/2025 11:24:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Current graphic:


3 posted on 04/18/2025 11:33:46 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

4 posted on 04/18/2025 11:35:43 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I can’t imagine how they could possibly inject water into the magma chambers without triggering massive steam explosions.😮🙄

Sounds like a good way to cause massive global warming, to me, however, I am NOT a geologist and may not know what the hell I’m talking about.

5 posted on 04/18/2025 11:38:40 AM PDT by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telescope115

Hold muh Chardonnay and watch this...............


6 posted on 04/18/2025 11:41:19 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I saw it as a child in theatre and it scared me.


7 posted on 04/18/2025 11:42:49 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: telescope115

You’re spot on! Go for it! No holding back.


8 posted on 04/18/2025 11:43:29 AM PDT by Patriot777 ("When you see these things begin to happen, look up, for your redemption draweth nigh.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

NASA’s controversial plan to cool the magma via drilling to vent.

Isn’t that what the geysers do.


9 posted on 04/18/2025 11:45:54 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“NASA has even proposed a controversial $3.46 billion plan to drill into the volcano and pump water through its magma chambers, theoretically reducing eruption risks by cooling the system.”

No mention made of hydrothermal power generation. I suspect these Poindexter scientists just want Americans to subsidize the cooling while they waste the power potential.


10 posted on 04/18/2025 11:48:57 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

No, the magma just boils the water from the underground stream until it is so hot the steam and water are elected out of the hole/vent. If Yellowstone erupts most of middle America would be affected. But it may never happen because the tectonic plates have been moving for thousands of years since the last eruption. We have several old volcanic hills where I live but there are no longer in danger of an eruption due to plate movement.


11 posted on 04/18/2025 11:53:10 AM PDT by Pol-92064
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just beam Spock directly into the chamber with an ice bomb and problem solved.


12 posted on 04/18/2025 12:00:33 PM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

Some of these Einsteins need to be taken out and clubbed to death.

Friggin man caused phearatic eruption.

How stupid can they get.

Phearatic eruptions are the most violent of eruptions. Tonga is thee prime example of one.


13 posted on 04/18/2025 12:03:19 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So, they’re suggesting INCREASING ‘global warming’? The heat would have to go somewhere.


14 posted on 04/18/2025 12:09:24 PM PDT by larrytown (A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
What could possibly go wrong?


15 posted on 04/18/2025 12:13:07 PM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telescope115

Boiling point increases with pressure. However, if they succeed in cooling the magma, it’ll heat the atmosphere.
Were they to put in a bunch of exchangers and turbines,
it’d make a great generation facility.


16 posted on 04/18/2025 12:26:22 PM PDT by sasquatch (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

An enemy or terror group could put a nuke into caldera.

That could get interesting.


17 posted on 04/18/2025 12:26:56 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I'm ready for it. I had plenty of practice as a kid pretending the living room floor was boiling hot lava.


18 posted on 04/18/2025 12:53:05 PM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telescope115

Like spitting into a forest fire


19 posted on 04/18/2025 1:03:18 PM PDT by Huskrrrr (Alinsky, you magnificent Bastard, I read your book!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wherever I go I hope there’s rum!


20 posted on 04/18/2025 1:04:30 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson