Drill into the magma chamber???
What could possibly go wrong?.....................
To: SunkenCiv
Don’t Drill, Baby, Don’t Drill! PINGGG!................
2 posted on
04/18/2025 11:24:39 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: Red Badger
Current graphic:

To: Red Badger
4 posted on
04/18/2025 11:35:43 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Red Badger
I can’t imagine how they could possibly inject water into the magma chambers without triggering massive steam explosions.😮🙄
Sounds like a good way to cause massive global warming, to me, however, I am NOT a geologist and may not know what the hell I’m talking about.
5 posted on
04/18/2025 11:38:40 AM PDT by
telescope115
(I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
To: Red Badger
NASA’s controversial plan to cool the magma via drilling to vent.
Isn’t that what the geysers do.
9 posted on
04/18/2025 11:45:54 AM PDT by
Vaduz
To: Red Badger
“NASA has even proposed a controversial $3.46 billion plan to drill into the volcano and pump water through its magma chambers, theoretically reducing eruption risks by cooling the system.”
No mention made of hydrothermal power generation. I suspect these Poindexter scientists just want Americans to subsidize the cooling while they waste the power potential.
To: Red Badger
Just beam Spock directly into the chamber with an ice bomb and problem solved.
12 posted on
04/18/2025 12:00:33 PM PDT by
alancarp
(George Orwell was an optimist.)
To: Red Badger
So, they’re suggesting INCREASING ‘global warming’? The heat would have to go somewhere.
14 posted on
04/18/2025 12:09:24 PM PDT by
larrytown
(A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
To: Red Badger
What could possibly go wrong?
15 posted on
04/18/2025 12:13:07 PM PDT by
Sirius Lee
("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
To: Red Badger
An enemy or terror group could put a nuke into caldera.
That could get interesting.
17 posted on
04/18/2025 12:26:56 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: Red Badger
I'm ready for it. I had plenty of practice as a kid pretending the living room floor was boiling hot lava.

18 posted on
04/18/2025 12:53:05 PM PDT by
fidelis
(Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
To: Red Badger
Wherever I go I hope there’s rum!
20 posted on
04/18/2025 1:04:30 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Red Badger
21 posted on
04/18/2025 1:05:32 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Red Badger
I’ve got a great idea — a giant outdoor event for every Demwit politician and rank-and-file stooge.
Then drill, baby, drill.
22 posted on
04/18/2025 1:06:41 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: Red Badger
Iceland drills to their magma that’s very close to the surface and injects water to make steam to drive turbines to give them very cheap electricity.
Does anyone know the difference between the magma below yellowstone and the magma below iceland?
24 posted on
04/18/2025 1:44:03 PM PDT by
ckilmer
To: Red Badger
26 posted on
04/18/2025 2:00:25 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away!)
To: Red Badger
Design a massive power plant off of it. If done correctly it could power the North American grid for the next 20,000 years.
32 posted on
04/18/2025 3:02:33 PM PDT by
Sawdring
To: Red Badger
Poke a sleeping tiger?
Not too smart...
33 posted on
04/18/2025 4:22:19 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
To: Red Badger
Despite reassurances, preparation remains criticalJust how does one prepare for a potentially earth shattering event? Warning will likely be minutes or hours, not enough time to evacuate the area that will need to be evacuated, i.e most of the Pacific Northwest and a good portion of the Midwest.
34 posted on
04/18/2025 4:59:42 PM PDT by
nuke_road_warrior
(Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
To: Red Badger
No matter what, they need enough funding to research it another 70,000 yearsfoe the sake humanity.
35 posted on
04/18/2025 8:55:24 PM PDT by
Theophilus
(covfefe)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson