Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: Angelino97
I have to admit that I would enjoy an ADULT version of the film that captures the themes he was trying to present through science fiction. It would be awesome.
2 posted on
03/23/2025 3:53:24 PM PDT by
cuban leaf
(2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
To: Angelino97
In that vein I’d also like to see The Forever War put to film.
3 posted on
03/23/2025 3:53:59 PM PDT by
cuban leaf
(2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
To: Angelino97
How about this? Let’s not make any TV shows or movies for the next 10 years?
To: Angelino97
I love Heinlein even though he had a distinct Oedipus complex.
5 posted on
03/23/2025 4:02:30 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Time to dump out the Treasury drawer and throw out all the junk that is wasting our money.)
To: Angelino97
It’s GOT to have power suits and the book version combat drop.
6 posted on
03/23/2025 4:02:45 PM PDT by
The Louiswu
(USA FIRST...USA FOREVER)
To: Angelino97
Homosexual movie? No thanks.
8 posted on
03/23/2025 4:07:20 PM PDT by
CodeToad
( )
To: Angelino97
To: Angelino97
Great book!
I must have read it 50+ years ago.
The movie was OK and i would love to a better version.
12 posted on
03/23/2025 4:09:31 PM PDT by
JimBianchi11
(The 2A is the cornerstone of our free society. Those that don't support it, oppose it.)
To: Angelino97
It’ll be crap, even if it’s a different style of crap from the 1997 movie. I won’t be watching this one either.
To: Angelino97
They already released it in 97.
Dizz has been on my alibi list ever since……
14 posted on
03/23/2025 4:12:15 PM PDT by
military cop
(I carry a .45....cause they don't make a .46....)
To: Angelino97
I would love to see a faithful adaptation of Starship Troopers. Maybe just a little more, and one I think would actually resonate better these days, is a faithful adaptation of Heinlein’s The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress.
15 posted on
03/23/2025 4:12:46 PM PDT by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: Angelino97
Heinlein is one my favorite authors.
The movie doesn't exactly follow the book, true, but you couldn't sell a movie like that.
RAH's target audience was pre-pubescent boys, so his focus was mostly on action/adventure, not co-ed showers and pup-tent quickies.
Later in his career, he wrote some pretty racy stuff, but this wasn't --- not originally.
17 posted on
03/23/2025 4:22:04 PM PDT by
ZOOKER
To: Angelino97
Why would the creator of the totally original ‘District 8’ want sloppy seconds on a 1997 film? Out of ideas like everyone else in Hollyweird? No thanks.
To: Angelino97
Don’t get me wrong, I love Paul Verhoeven’s 1997 cut, not least because Verhoeven tried and failed to satirize the subject matter. The movie was CRAP
Yes he tried and failed to satirize the book.
A good satirization would have been funny.
His movie was sad and incoherent.
21 posted on
03/23/2025 4:35:29 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: Angelino97
Sign me up! I loved District 9 and Chappie.
To: Angelino97
Neil Blomkamp has a tall order in making a faithful adaptation of Starship Troopers. This movie could easily break him even if he does a great job. Explaining “The Franchise” to an audience in 2020something would be enough to make their heads explode. I wish him well and look forward to seeing his adaptation.
24 posted on
03/23/2025 4:36:45 PM PDT by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: Angelino97
It's ancient Sparta gone interstellar. Not even close.
And it is not even "structured along extremely hierarchical and militaristic lines".
The basic concept of the society was if you want to be a voter you need to show first that you were willing to serve the community. And while the book follows someone who joined the military (because most other options would have made for a boring book) the military was not the only path.
One of the early chapters talks about this and how they would find a way for anyone who wanted to do their (I think it was two years) of service to do it. I believe the example used was a deaf and blind guy who was in a wheelchair and if he wanted to serve they would find a job for him. Once he had completed his service he was just as much a voting citizen as the greatest military hero.
Because it was not what you did but that you were willing to give of yourself to do it.
If you want to do the book justice you need to get the world building right.
28 posted on
03/23/2025 4:47:34 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
( Not my circus. Not my monkeys. But I can pick out the clowns at 100 yards.)
To: Angelino97
To the everlasting glory of the infantry
Shines the name, shines the name of Rodger Young!
31 posted on
03/23/2025 4:50:45 PM PDT by
yuleeyahoo
(“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!” - the deep-state)
To: Angelino97
I loved the book; I loved the movie.
They were two different tellings of the same story.
To: Angelino97
It'd be very hard to out-hot Denise Richards.

43 posted on
03/23/2025 5:43:10 PM PDT by
PLMerite
("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too. 😁 " - Robert Conquest )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson