Skip to comments.
Surprising Detail, Twist In Gene Hackman's Will Revealed
www.iheart.com ^
| March 14, 2025
| Jason Hall
Posted on 03/14/2025 9:29:21 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: Red Badger
Well, now we know why the kids didn’t check on dear old dad.
2
posted on
03/14/2025 9:32:34 AM PDT
by
Valpal1
(Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
To: Red Badger
He was great in Unforgiven mocking English Bob as the "Duck of Death".
3
posted on
03/14/2025 9:32:41 AM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: Red Badger
They died alone, and it was a week before discovery.
Doesn’t look like the children cared.
4
posted on
03/14/2025 9:32:50 AM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
To: SauronOfMordor
Now we know why...................
5
posted on
03/14/2025 9:33:43 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: Red Badger
Awakawa's
...savings would be donated to charity if both died within 90 days of each other. Awakawa's estate could still go to charity as New Mexico is a community property state.Now that's an interesting term in the will. Were they afraid of foul play? I'm surprised that the same term was not in both their wills. I'm sure Hackman's three kids harbored grudges about Dad dumping Mom and marrying wife #2 who was 30 years younger than himself.
Hackman's estate could presumably go to his children, despite not being included in his will, as they are the most direct living heirs
Wow, that's surprising.
Hackman's son, Christopher, the oldest of his three adult children, reportedly hired prominent California trust and estate attorney Andrew M. Katzenstein to challenge the will
There's no way that legal challenge could be completed in that short amount of time.
6
posted on
03/14/2025 9:35:00 AM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(Democrats who say ‘no one is above the law’ won’t mind going to prison for the money they stole)
To: Red Badger
They more likely than not gave someone POA...No matter...it's their business....and while it will become a Public Record, i'd just let the family go through this without our input.
IOW....Rest In Peace.
To: Red Badger
Maybe the offspring were estranged from him for other reasons. It happens. Or maybe they are already financially secured because he helped them well before he passed away. It seems odd the offspring didn’t stay in close touch. When my dad was declining and in his 90’s I flew to see him for a week almost every month for 18 months. We had professional people with him 24/7, and my sister was just blocks away. She got a break when I was visiting.
8
posted on
03/14/2025 9:36:18 AM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The road is a dangerous place man, you can die out anhere...or worse. -Johnny Paycheck )
To: Red Badger
9
posted on
03/14/2025 9:37:33 AM PDT
by
calljack
(Stealing the 2020 Election will go down in history as the worst political miscalculation of all time)
To: Dr. Franklin
I guess Clint Eastwood will have to see him in hell :)
He didn’t deserve this. He was building a house!
10
posted on
03/14/2025 9:37:48 AM PDT
by
dp0622
(Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
To: SaxxonWoods
We need a divorce law for use within families. Any estranged person should be allowed to disavow any family member.
We might already have it in some form in some states but it’s not putting a stop to all the challenges. People are territorial vultures.
To: SaxxonWoods
Adult children often get an insect up their posterior when they ruminate upon how their childhood wasn’t perfect.
12
posted on
03/14/2025 9:41:34 AM PDT
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: Red Badger
Nothing weirds people out more than when someone passes away and who gets what.
I’ve seen it many times.
Any idea what the estate is worth?
13
posted on
03/14/2025 9:42:11 AM PDT
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
To: Red Badger
I bet the wife turned Hackman against his kids.
To: Valpal1
And apparently the wife was too tight to hire a caregiver for her husband.
15
posted on
03/14/2025 9:42:44 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(It is long past time to dump the entire Treasury drawer and throw away the crap.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Wow, that's surprising.Not surprising at all: that's part of the common law for centuries, and why you are usually asked to specify what happens to your estate if your primary beneficiary goes before you do.
I guess given the age difference, neither Hackman nor his wife thought he would go before she did.
16
posted on
03/14/2025 9:44:52 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: ProtectOurFreedom
No, it didn’t say the will had gone through probate, just that his son had hired a lawyer.
17
posted on
03/14/2025 9:45:06 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(It is long past time to dump the entire Treasury drawer and throw away the crap.)
To: pierrem15
she would go before he did.
18
posted on
03/14/2025 9:45:17 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: Red Badger
To: SauronOfMordor
He kept them at arms length all their lives
20
posted on
03/14/2025 9:48:02 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
(In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. Napoleon Bonaparte I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson