To: BipolarBob
I’m thinking maybe the load shifted not long after he began his climb.
4 posted on
02/02/2025 9:46:27 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: BenLurkin
No load. Just three people and a donor organ, from what I gather.
19 posted on
02/02/2025 10:09:31 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Before you post a nasty, stop and think: "Would that person slap me if I said it in person?" )
To: BenLurkin
A load shift would cause a massive fireball??
38 posted on
02/02/2025 10:33:27 AM PST by
BipolarBob
(I've had enough! I'm moving to Slab City to be free.)
To: BenLurkin
Yeah, load shift stall looked good but ADS B data says lowest airspeed was 240 kt, well above stall speed.
46 posted on
02/02/2025 10:54:48 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: BenLurkin
I’m thinking maybe the load shifted not long after he began his climb. Possibly, but I think it's more than that. It appears to me that 1) the plane was already in flames as it came down, and 2) it looks like it's coming down at a rate faster than just falling, possibly being powered down while burning.
I have confidence that the NTSB will find out fairly conclusively. Eventually.
63 posted on
02/02/2025 1:13:13 PM PST by
libertylover
(Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
To: BenLurkin
I’m thinking maybe the load shifted not long after he began his climb.I heard the plane flew from Miami to Philly that afternoon without incident. Taking on a couple of passengers shouldn't have greatly affected the loading.
74 posted on
02/02/2025 2:59:50 PM PST by
Fresh Wind
(Kamala defines herself in just 4 words..."Nothing comes to mind.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson