Skip to comments.
Schrödinger’s Quantum Cat Awakens to Revolutionize Computing
SciTechDaily ^
| Jan 14, 2025
| Univeersity of South Wales
Posted on 01/16/2025 6:37:39 PM PST by grey_whiskers
In a groundbreaking experiment, UNSW researchers successfully applied the Schrödinger’s cat concept using an antimony atom to enhance quantum computations.
This method significantly improves the reliability of quantum data processing and error correction, potentially accelerating the advent of practical quantum computing.
(Excerpt) Read more at scitechdaily.com ...
TOPICS: Science; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: antimony; australia; cat; qbits; quantumcat; quantumcomputing; schrdinger; schrodingerscat; science; unsw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: aquila48
And those numbers of yours only make sense if I can reliably store (and recall) TWO bits for each qubit.
Theoretically, qubits can store and process data just like regular bits.
Practically, quantum computing has a hardware problem and major trouble with errors. Today's quantum's computers are unbelievably powerful and fast, but their output is garbage, useless.
Qubits require a perfect quantum state of 50/50 "0" and "1." A ratio of 50.000001/49.999999 won't cut it! Qubits are very small and very susceptible to noise and interference. It may not be possible for a qubit particle to achieve a perfect quantum state in this universe.
Google thinks they have a work-around for this error problem by "estimating" and "rounding" the quantum errors and they predict a workable quantum computer in 10 years. This timeline is not encouraging. It is the same timeline for cold fusion reactors 50 years ago!
To: grey_whiskers
Benjamin Wilhelm, Xi Yu, Prof Andrea Morello, Dr. Danielle Holmes
Nerd .............. nerd .......... nerd........... would boink.
22
posted on
01/16/2025 11:46:09 PM PST
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: tumblindice
23
posted on
01/16/2025 11:52:55 PM PST
by
sasquatch
(Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
To: grey_whiskers
I shot Schrödinger’s cat with Chekhov’s gun.
24
posted on
01/17/2025 12:10:27 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
To: Dr. Sivana
"Well, since the Internet is largely made up of cat videos, it stands to reason that a famous cat would assist in the creation of even more computing power."
Who the heck do you suppose invented both in the first place! Now you are just learning about it? You really need to do some serious catch up!
25
posted on
01/17/2025 4:47:55 AM PST
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: Ciaphas Cain
"(changing it by observing it)" Physicists have a different definition of "observing" than you or I do. If you observe a jet flying overhead, you don't change it by looking at it, and it doesn't behave any differently if 1, or 100,000, or zero people observe it. It is changed, though, by being observable.
To "observe" something as tiny as an atom, means that you must measure its properties. It's the measurement process that alters it. That's what "observing" means.
26
posted on
01/17/2025 5:33:12 AM PST
by
norwaypinesavage
(Freud: projection is a defense mechanism of those struggling with inferiority complexes)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson