|
Posted on 01/01/2025 12:57:31 PM PST by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Kimchi has style? Suuuurrrreee it does. Not mine howsomeever.
ivmctn bkmk
That’s the funniest thing I’ve seen in awhile. If you listen with your eyes closed, it sounds exactly like a nature documentary and the narrator sounds like Sir David Attenborough.
Oh I hope someone makes sure PDJT sees this!
Until the robots change the rules.
” JUST IN: Rep. Andy Biggs Files Papers to Run for Arizona Governor in 2026 After Trump Signals Support for RINO Karrin Taylor Robson “
by Jordan Conradson Jan. 23, 2025
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/just-rep-andy-biggs-files-papers-run-arizona/
Executive order to release JFK, RFK, and MLK assassination files is signed!
Steven W. wrote:
“BREAKING: TRUMP DECLAS MLK+RFK+MLK”
Sauce?
Did they use mRNA derived or SinoVax?
Nella wrote:
ThankQ for the info!
Dear smileyface,
The updated 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccines have been released, but patients who have recently had COVID may assume infection alone will protect them.
However, the CDC advises that patients who have recently had COVID-19 may consider waiting up to 3 months before getting the updated COVID vaccine.1 That’s because the risk of getting COVID-19 is less likely in the weeks to months following a SARS-CoV-2 infection.1
Okay, my questions:
How many average/normal people realized the Covid vaxseems used mRNA technology vs. thinking they were typical vaxseems?
-—> Probably less than 20%. My sister has been in the med field for quite some time and she was pretty clueless about it.
Of those who knew they used mRNA technology, how many knew this technology was really not tried and true versus thought it was already used to cure cancer?
-—> It got, and is still publicly really murky there. The best layout of the fraud/bioweapon circumstance is Dr. David Martin’s recounting of it. The shortest and most succinct is his ~25 min at the European Union around 2022 (easy YouTube find).
Correct me if I am wrong, but the experimental mRNA cancer vaxseems pre 2020 were not really conceptulaized as vaxseems so much as targeted gene therapy?
Moreover, they didn’t make it as far as human trials due to the problems that were shwoing up in animal experiments?
What was the nature of these problems?
-—>3-Fer-—> (nutshell simple) Utilizing the theory behind mRNA you are essentially crafting a package that will deliver a toolkit and action sequence that will modify a specific OR general type of cellular body and elicit it to do or make something that will perform a desired action. Like many ideas, it sounds great on paper but like communism, the implementation is a bitch.
What was the news telling us about the promise of mRNA technology for cancer pre 2020 and then in 2020 when the lockdowns started and talk of a Covid vaccine started?
-—> Not much, other than using that as the basis of dropping the idea it was/is already in use.
Is Ellison calling this mRNA AI shot thing a “vaccine?” Isn’t it more like targeted genetic therapy?
-—> No clue what Ellison’s doing, but not only is it a gene therapy (targeted like a shotgun with flechette rounds!), it’s last WAY longer than the citizenry was told it would. People are still demonstrating production of inoculation derived spike proteins years after getting dosed.
The idea is to test people regularly for cancer indications and then give them this shot before a tumor is even found?
-—> No, I believe that as/in a cancer therapy the “package” has to be custom tailored to the individual.
I though the promise of mRNA technology for cancer was for something that would be used and work where other treatments failed and/or with hard to treat types of cancer. Pre 2020, was mRNA considered safe enough to try even as a last ditch effort with people who had run out options?
-—> IIRC, prior to CoVid mRNA was a “you are going to die, soon, you want to try this?” type cancer therapy. One that i’d bet a few folks have a beef about compared to the success people at the 2 minute life warning have had with the anthelmintics (worm medicines).
Is there a theoretical basis by which mRNA can work against cancer but should not be used against viruses? That is, is there a mechanism of action with it where it works in X case, but not Y?
-—> Yes, in as much as you’re going to design it to target or tag a very specific cell type, or protein etc... Rather than have it hijack whatever it comes across, or “by chance” prefers (Ovaries, testes, brain, liver, et.al.). The observed action of the mRNA virus inoculation is why everyone even lightly read into the history surrounding it believes that it was in actuality a binary population reduction biological weapon...
Is mRNA thus then a treatment, an not a vaccine? Pre 2020, we were led to believe that vaccines prevent one from getting the flu, measles, tetanus, whatever. Then we were told with Covid, that, oh no, vaccines just make you get the whatever to a milder degree then you would otherwise.
-—> True Vaccines convey sterilizing immunity. Smallpox, old Measles, Diptheria etc evolve so slowly that inoculation induced immunity is pretty much permanent. Tetanus (chime in if I’m off med types) is essentially a long period allergy shot against the toxin produced by tetanus bacteria. The toxin is extremely powerful, the shot “clues your body in” to taking out the toxin right away rather than allowing it to rise to the level where it interferes with muscular action by the time/before the immune system recognizes it.
So does an mRNA vaccine for cancer just make you get milder cancer? I guess that is better than the alternative.
-—> I’m not aware of it actually having that good of a track record.
Suppose the markers for cancer that show up in routine blood tests are just like the markers for Covid that show up in PCR tests in that a person has remnants of something they fought off and doesn’t really Covid? Do they really have cancer or just the by product of the cancer we have all the time but our body deals with?
-—> In that case if you are really on your pharmaceutical game you could really milk the cancer fear providing people a “cure” for something that 99.999% of the time healthy peoples bodies just naturally take care of...
Q post 1122
>>979093
TRUST SESSIONS.
TRUST WRAY.
TRUST KANSAS.
TRUST HOROWITZ.
TRUST HUBER.
Q
```````
Methinks “TRUST” refers to those with the system that have/are part of the trust.
Apparently!
That's the whole idea. They shouldn't be here. We should not be paying a dime to assist them in staying here.
SpyNavy
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
