Dowdy doodee!
Just one question, Mo. Are you including men who identify as women?
>> it was dispiriting to see the fierce backlash to Geraldine Ferraro, Anita Hill and Hillary Clinton’s co-presidency and candidacy
The backlash wasn’t because they’re womyn... it’s because they’re evil, or idiots, or both. Same reason we don’t take crap from you, Maureen.
For as often as they keep disparaging men, you would think male voters would vote 75-25 for Trump.
White liberal women are the most insane
Video
Unhinged Kamala Supporter screams at toddler in a stroller in Houston
https://rumble.com/v5k89lp-unhinged-kamala-supporter-screams-at-toddler-in-a-stroller.html
Democrats: The party of women and the men who fear them.©️
Upp, oop. I mean, yay, A MoDo thread.
I only read these threads for the comments.
You’ve seen the responses of men why they no longer court or marry women. The mental state of women is creating a tectonic change in western civilization.
The election is not about the sexes. It’s about choosing between a straight-talking, confident, tireless, competent person who will move the country back towards its former greatness, or a weak, blathering, incompetent who will lock the country in a nightmare of marxism.
How bad do you want it ladies? The jokes write themselves.
Rules! Maureen Dowd.
If women want Que Mala Harris, they are welcome to her! Unfortunately that means that they force her on everyone else.
As an aside, several of my college-educated. women friends - by no means stupid women - are all in for Harris. There is no reasoning with them. And frankly I can't understand their support for her.
Yup.
Geraldine Ferraro.... another Northeast liberal.
Anita Hill.... lying b*tch trotted out and propped up by Dems to try and derail Clarence Thomas' nomination.
And Hillary.... no one voted for Hillary Clinton or a co-presidency! And her lack of appeal was confirmed in 2008, and reconfirmed in 2016.
But it was all sexism and chauvinism right Mo?
Because, Mo, you idiot, even though you can imitate a man, you are still a woman!
“How Bad Do You Want It, Ladies?”
A guy could get in a lot of trouble (or lucky) asking a question like that.
Ma Harris
the title of dowd’s editorial seems to acknowledge the implicit or explicit role of sex in determining western womens’ rationality, at least in regards to politics.
and it does so in a way that would at least on the surface seem highly suggestive and offensive to women at least in polite society.
beyond the political quid pro quo, the title seems to allude to prostitution, and invite the parallel between the sex for money paradigm.
john gray, author of men are from mars (etc) has a Ph D. but it is from Columbia Pacific University, a correspondence school which has long since become defunct. this is not exactly a ringing academic bona fide. it has been a long time since i read the book but what is the summary? that men and women think differently and need more communication? i would agree with dowd if she is claiming that that seems dated (along with her own book on the topic from 2005).
it is established fact that western women think differently from western men. but why, especially if we accept the feminist premise that women can think just as well as men.
dowd undermines most of whatever she seems to be trying to argue for by going on an irrational TDS rant early in her editorial. did she eat some bad baloney in her fridge? bad wine in the box? what?
her editorial title and her points are self defeating. what would she, or her presumed savior, round-heels, say to netanyahu or iranian mullahs in a mideast peace conference? how badly do you want it? she (or surrogate roundheels) would be laughed out of the conference in 5 seconds.
note to she who wants what she can never have: power is power. and p**** is p****. don’t confuse the two.