Posted on 10/07/2024 1:19:20 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
Funny anti-Starmer song once the theme song of a classic British sitcom.
Transcript linked below video.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
It keeps coming up on my videos. Do they actually expect people of my demographic or yours to donate to that gob-shyte’s campaign? I tried leaving a .!.. ..!. emoji in the donation dialogue box, but they already thought of that. You can’t.
#12 has the right link, as I’ve repeatedly explained.
It sounds like something you order in a sushi restaurant in Camaroon.
Getting an old black and white movie with some old stuffy British gentlemen honoring a compatriot ..no way to move frames to further the clip along...does the funny song come in later?
But Tommy Boyce and Bobby Hart were the writers credited for penning The Monkees Tv Show's Theme Song.
Things sometimes go weird with HTML...
Usually they go weird because of the person who typed the HTML command. However, the HTML command did what the coder told it to do. Too bad he gave the command the wrong URL to grab. 🙂👍
Saying that HTML sometimes does weird things, is like saying AI got something wrong. Neither posses intelligence. They are both just executing instructions that have been presented to them.
There is an old saying that all coders know very well. It states that if the computer is given garbage, it will produce garbage as the output. The short version is; garbage in, garbage out. That garbage can be the fault of the instruction(s) or it can be the data retrieved. On rare occasions it is a combination of both bad instruction(s) & data.
This time it was the instruction given a pointer that pointed to the wrong data that was to be retrieved.
I realize that is more than you care to know, but hopefully you will now understand exactly why HTML produces weird results sometimes.
However, there was an element of amusement to this mistake, that begs the question was it accidental or intentional?
Was this a clever way for him to insinuate that Keir Starmer & his administration (or whatever they call it in Britain) are a bunch of monkeys, without admitting that was his intention all along for plausible deniability that this was his intention all along?
If some get it great, if others don't, then saying it was just a mistake. Makes his deniability accepted. If I am correct, Britain has laws against saying certain things in the internet. Could this be a chargeable offense?
What they do charge people with is ridiculous, so it may require being clever to speak freely.
Shame on you Britain.
If so, he's probably correct. 🤣 I don't know because I do not pay close attention to British politics.
But it is so nuanced that most would not get it, including me, without giving it a thought along those lines. Which I had enough time to give it that thought. Very clever if that was the case.🙂👍
Well, thanks.
Yes, it’s a little more than I wanted to know tonight; but I’ll think about it tomorrow.
Good Night :-)
It was their opening theme song. Perhaps it wasn’t in the pilot yet.
The theme song starts at 1:33 of the pilot, right after the speeches by the stuffy old Brits, which was the “induction”. A minute and a half should not be too much of a strain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.