Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Legal Experts Are Worried About a Second Trump Presidency
The New York Times ^ | Oct. 3, 2024 | Emily Bazelon and Mattathias Schwartz

Posted on 10/03/2024 11:47:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

As a candidate for president once again, Donald Trump could not be clearer about his plans to use the Justice Department to seek revenge against his enemies. During his 2016 campaign, his rallies exploded with the chant “Lock Her Up.” Now Trump talks about ordering prosecutions against so many people that his threats have become commonplace. “WHEN I WIN, those people that CHEATED will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law, which will include long term prison sentences,” Trump posted online in September about election administrators, among others. It’s just one example in a long list that extends to President Biden and his family, Vice President Kamala Harris, members of Congress, prosecutors, judges and former F.B.I., Department of Justice and national-security officials.

Trump, of course, also says that he’s currently the victim of political prosecution by the Biden administration. Jack Smith, the special counsel appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland, charged Trump in Florida for refusing to return classified documents and in Washington for trying to overturn the 2020 election. State prosecutors, both Democrats, brought election-related charges in Georgia and convicted Trump in New York of a hush-money scheme to influence the 2016 election. In his telling, all the cases are witch hunts by “Politicized ‘Persecutors.’” Retorting to Harris at their debate in September, Trump said: “They talk about democracy: I’m a threat to democracy. They’re the threat to democracy — with the fake Russia Russia Russia investigation that went nowhere.”

But there is a fundamental difference between the investigations Trump threatens and the ones he’s now subject to. There is no known evidence that Biden instigated these investigations or has tried to influence their outcome. Garland has given Smith authority over how to proceed in the investigations of Trump — and also appointed different special counsels to...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: emilybazelon; gaslighting; lawfare; mattathiasschwartz; nyslimes; nyt; tds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Mark Levin for special prosecutor


21 posted on 10/03/2024 12:35:38 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

OMG! Trump might do exactly what we’ve been doing! What a calamity that will be!


22 posted on 10/03/2024 12:45:45 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

LOL. All legal experts, huh?

Did they interview the legal experts who are anxiously awaiting a Trump presidency?


23 posted on 10/03/2024 12:49:40 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roving

“If they broke the law, so be it.”

Because noone is above the law, except deep state members and Democrats.


24 posted on 10/03/2024 12:50:38 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is the very definition of Irony and these morons have no sense of awareness.


25 posted on 10/03/2024 12:51:40 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“there is no known evidence”

The rallying cry of every psychopath.


26 posted on 10/03/2024 12:53:21 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yup they are terrified not of lawfare, but of the law

As always the left projects


27 posted on 10/03/2024 12:57:06 PM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

this is a primo example of “manufactured news” (aka: propaganda)

anyone could round up a few rogue “experts” to say almost anything (with or without paying them) — there are 6000 colleges in USA plus tons of self-styled “political experts” and — Lord help us — 1,300,000 attorneys —

in short, another NYT election propaganda Fraud

“A society becomes totalitarian when its structure becomes flagrantly artificial: that is when its ruling class has lost its function but succeeds in clinging to power by force or Fraud.” George Orwell


28 posted on 10/03/2024 1:04:32 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Biden Harris Law fare prosecuted innocent people including Trump.

Trump wants to prosecute criminals.


29 posted on 10/03/2024 1:12:05 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I've already seen the damage our fake "legal system" can do.

Tina Peters is going to prison for facing down an election-rigging Commie secretary of Soros in Colorado.

30 posted on 10/03/2024 1:12:08 PM PDT by kiryandil (Kraft durch Freude! - The Kamunist and The Walzrus )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because their lawfare was criminal and they will face consequences?

Hammer, meet Nail.

Nail, this is Hammer.

Y'all have fun now.

31 posted on 10/03/2024 1:13:25 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ( Not my circus. Not my monkeys. But I can pick out the clowns at 100 yards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s just payback to Democrats who politicized the justice system.


32 posted on 10/03/2024 1:23:02 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“The DoJ lawyers have skills not easily found elsewhere.”

I see zero evidence of that. And there are a thousand ways to charge them in conservative areas. One easy example... Jack Smith’s crimes and raid on Mar-a-Lago happened in Florida.


33 posted on 10/03/2024 1:41:14 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Mark Levin would make a heck of a Chief of Staff.


34 posted on 10/03/2024 2:05:42 PM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

Chief staff and press secretary.

“GET OFF THE PHONE YOU BIG DOPE!”


35 posted on 10/03/2024 2:10:10 PM PDT by Texas resident (Que Mala= Bad Juju.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Speaking of a second Trump presidency, nope—I don’t want CCP-allied employers taking up shop in the US:

https://revolver.news/2024/10/trump-remarkably-bold-plan-to-revitalize-manufacturing-gop-wake-up-get-on-board/


36 posted on 10/03/2024 2:14:47 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There is no known evidence that Biden instigated these investigations or has tried to influence their outcome.


only if you ignore the evidence.


37 posted on 10/03/2024 2:22:55 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In the fwiw department, Jack Smith lacks jurisdiction.

I gotta tell ya, the epitome of irony is the Biden DoJ and FBI are investigating both attempted assassination on president Trump.

Think about it, every democrat, DNC, corporate media, CIA, NSA already have blood on their hands. Beirut, Benghazi, Afghanistan,etc.

JFK?

Trump’s ear for starters. There will be another attempt on the president’s life.

5.56mm


38 posted on 10/03/2024 2:23:20 PM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho have got to go. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“...prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law,”

What part of that bespeaks a dictator? He is talking about doing what is legal. The whiners are crying about what they know they DESERVE, not what Trump is saying.


39 posted on 10/03/2024 2:28:02 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Donald Trump could not be clearer about his plans to use the Justice Department to seek revenge against his enemies“”…”

That would be illegal on the face of it and actionable. Any prosecutor going along with such an attempt would themselves be subject to arrest and prosecution.

The only people a TrumpDOJ could prosecute would be those who had committed some crime or broken some law.


40 posted on 10/03/2024 2:31:29 PM PDT by TalBlack (Fight Fight Fight America https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKOJdMog6T0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson