Apropos of nothing, I'd like some serious work done for nailing down the dating for the Meteor Crater.
Posted on 09/07/2024 7:11:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Baby bust.
So, who gets to lay claim to the victim group “Indigenous”?
Didn’t that evil Base-tard Columbus murder all the Indigenous peoples?
Or did that Indigenous gang just take it all from a previous Indigenous gang?
Who took it all from the previous indigenous gang . . .
Apropos of nothing, I'd like some serious work done for nailing down the dating for the Meteor Crater.
Bookmark.
And the rise of sea levels after the last Ice Age ended put the traces of that migration well under water. But it is a close to scientific certainty now that humans got to southern Chile roughly 30,000 years ago, and various places in between, and that they got here via the Pacific coast route.
Remember when they used to teach something called "grammar" in American schools?
“But it is a close to scientific certainty now that humans got to southern Chile roughly 30,000 years ago, and various places in between, and that they got here via the Pacific coast route.”
I have studied this in depth for years now. And there is absolutely no reason why a southern route wasn’t just as possible.
The Mercator projection completely skews our perspective and even the experts are subconsciously fooled by it. And this is why we refuse to accept it. Visually the distance looks impossible by the Mercator projection. But in reality it isn’t far at all from Australia to Tierra del Fuego. The currents favor it, the winds favor it, and there is food and water all along the ice packs of Antarctica. If the inuit can live on ice now so could early man then. If man could float down the coast from the north then they could float across in the south. It could have even happened simultaneously or a southern migration before. There is some real explaining to be done why the oldest sites found are in Tierra del Fuego and not in the north.
They didn’t include 20 million illegals in their today’s population.
There were about 134 million when I was born on the eve of WW2, when America was still America. With ongoing filthification of the country, we are way overcrowded. Can’t be good.
And what’s with this “BCE” language manipulation?
So Putin could claim the US belongs to Russia. Except that the inhabitants of Siberia came from some where around Mesopotamia (geography changes).
Meanwhile, research shows it took about 300 years for the population to grow from 350 in 1610 (est., and did not include Native Americans until 1860) to its first 100 million (about 1915), then 50 years to attain to 200 million (1968), then about 40 years to grow to 300 million (2007), and this is estimated to grow to 400 million by 2060(about 50 years from 2007).
You just may be right.
But you're surely bucking the "narrative."
From what I see, the narrative is just another word for "That's my story, and I'm sticking to it!"
Just remember, "trust the science" except when it's not the truth, which may be a frequently occurring phenomenon.
I think I need to point out that what you quoted was what I quoted from Thud’s comment. My own comment about a southern route is after that. Did you mean to reply to Thud or me?
I'm not sure.
Whoever made the statement was probably correct, but it's not the so-called "narrative."
That is, I tend to agree with the statement -- not the "trust the science" narrative.
“That is, I tend to agree with the statement — not the “trust the science” narrative.”
Thud originally made that comment and I quoted it in my comment. But you replied to mine not his so just giving credit where credit is due.
Yes, me neither. The official narrative dictates that all early man were hydrophobic and too stupid to float. Yet there appears to be evidence of Neanderthal on islands in the Mediterranean. And the indigenous Australians floated crossed the Wallace line over 65,000 years ago.
The Solutrians pre-date the Asiatics.
Now if you contend that ancient extra-terrestrial aliens took them that far ...
“Humans were not then capable of sea navigation without sight of land for weeks.”
They didn’t have to be... All they had to do was jump in the water on a floaty and the circumpolar winds and currents would take them right along Antarctica to the tip of South America.
No need for complicated navigation at all. And they could survive the trip by hugging the ice pack of Antarctica where there is abundance of food and water.
If the pre-Thule could do it they could do it. Ice pack travel and survival ability is not uniquely possible to the north Arctic.
Lol. I’d like to know how to go “through” history, too. Is there a door? A passageway? Or is history a fluid, like water or air?
The DNA doesn’t support it, and there was no reason for Australasians to go anywhere, anyway: plenty of land and a very small population. They didn’t even make it to New Zealand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
