Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Trump indictment, appeal, Jack Smith launches final pre-election moves
The Washington Post ^ | August 30, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. EDT | Perry Stein and Josh Dawsey

Posted on 08/30/2024 10:28:03 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Special counsel Jack Smith tried to strike a careful balance in the revised indictment he brought against Donald Trump on Tuesday — hoping to salvage enough of his election-interference case to get it to a jury without running afoul of the Supreme Court’s new and vague definition of presidential immunity.

A day earlier, Smith filed an appeal in his other prosecution of the former president, hoping to resurrect the classified documents indictment that a trial judge had thrown out.

In both instances, Smith is trying to nurse back to health cases with potentially fatal ailments: in Florida, a set of charges dismissed by a highly skeptical Trump appointee; in D.C., a case of alleged election obstruction that the nation’s highest court has already amputated once, and may do so again.

The fate of each case is very much a political question, not just a legal one. Trump is again running for president, and both the revised indictment and the Florida appeal face months of proceedings that will prevent a trial before the upcoming election.

If Trump returns to the White House, his Justice Department would almost certainly drop the federal cases against him. If he loses, Smith is signaling he plans to push ahead, with Trump likely to spend months or years after the election in court.

The revised D.C. indictment, known as a superseding indictment, reflects some carefully calculated decisions and legal maneuvering, according to legal experts. The Supreme Court’s landmark decision to grant broad criminal immunity to presidents left much for lower courts to decide on what is an official presidential act that cannot be prosecuted and what is a private one that could be subject to criminal charges.

Smith concluded, for example, that some conversations about...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: seescotusjan6ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
At what point does Jack Smith's "election interference" case against Trump become, itself, "election interference?"
1 posted on 08/30/2024 10:28:03 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Smith needs his law license pulled. The bass turd is a political hack.


2 posted on 08/30/2024 10:30:11 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Liberals are FOS. The greatest threat to "democracy" is "immigration". Stupid morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"At what point does Jack Smith's "election interference" case against Trump become, itself, "election interference?""

I was thinking the same thing myself and it has been blatant election interference since the day Smith was illegally hired.

3 posted on 08/30/2024 10:30:26 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

>> Smith needs his law license pulled.
... and his neck stretched.


4 posted on 08/30/2024 10:35:47 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It is election interference, as is the WaPo’s IDIOTIC take on this — “nourishing back to health” a completely ILLEGAL case brought by a ILLEGALLY “appointed” Special Counsel that does not follow the LAW requiring the Senate to approve in the first place.

Utter Bullcrap. And Smith SHOULD be disbarred along with Merrick Garland. Both are psychopaths— frankly.


5 posted on 08/30/2024 10:38:35 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How abt NO. You were never approved as Sp Council. Why is no one on this


6 posted on 08/30/2024 10:39:44 AM PDT by Singermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The lesson for Republicans should be, once and for all, that you can't "reach across the aisle" with Democrats and expect fair treatment.

Democrats have repeatedly bragged about "dragging Republicans along" until it no longer suits their needs, and then they will not hesitate to "pull the trigger" on whatever the next steps in their plan are.

-PJ

7 posted on 08/30/2024 10:43:20 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
...hoping to salvage enough of his election-interference case...

Irony.
8 posted on 08/30/2024 10:45:19 AM PDT by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Jack Smith can always be counted on for a “bump up” in the polls.

BTW the guy looks, speaks, & acts like a weirdo.


9 posted on 08/30/2024 10:48:21 AM PDT by unclebankster (Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Smith is seditious, trying to introduce non-Constitutional European standards of prosecution in to the US.


10 posted on 08/30/2024 10:49:49 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well ol’ Jack is going to be on the unemployment line the day Trump takes office, so he better enjoy it now.


11 posted on 08/30/2024 11:06:27 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Correction to Stein and Dowsey:

It is ONLY a political question. The legal side isn’t justice, but rather Lawfare bent on Trump losing the election.

In other words, illegal election interference.


12 posted on 08/30/2024 11:06:30 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How does this jackass “Smith” have any authority to indict anything?


13 posted on 08/30/2024 11:13:29 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck
the day Smith was illegally hired.

Indeed. The man has no authority, just raw usurped power.

14 posted on 08/30/2024 11:14:34 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

When he wasn’t legally appointed to the job of doing so three monkey media mum.


15 posted on 08/30/2024 11:17:34 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

HOW INTERESTING THAT THIS THREAD HAS THE LAST 4 NUMBERS: 1776


16 posted on 08/30/2024 11:18:50 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Will no one rid us of these turbulent anti-American, anti-Christian hit men?


17 posted on 08/30/2024 11:18:52 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I hope Trump gets elected and puts Jack Smith in jail for the rest of his life for treason, sedition and election interference. He should be put in the cell with a J6 prisoner. That would be the just way he meets his end.


18 posted on 08/30/2024 11:38:05 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

According to these same villains, everything Nixon did was “hunting” or “persecuting” political opponents including keeping an enemies list. That sorry paper made movies patting itself on the back for Watergate.

But when the parties are reversed, they wag their tails and wave poms poms.


19 posted on 08/30/2024 11:51:16 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

And Nixon never even did anything to the people who were on his lists. He just made lists


20 posted on 08/30/2024 11:59:51 AM PDT by Freee-dame ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson