Posted on 08/21/2024 8:20:20 PM PDT by CDR Kerchner
Dear Mr. Kennedy:
I have heard rumors you might be suspending your campaign. You should not suspend your campaign; but instead file federal and/or state lawsuits challenging Kamala Harris’ constitutional eligibility for the office of President (POTUS) and Commander in Chief (CinC).
As a candidate for the same office as Harris, you have legal standing (to which many others have not been granted) to legally challenge Kamala Harris in the federal and state courts; and thus force SCOTUS to take up the issue once and for all on the merits; and decide who is a “natural born Citizen” (“nbC”) of the United States kind of Citizen per the original intent, understanding, purpose, and WHY when the founders and framers chose that national security protection term; and placed it only into Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. For WHY see: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/naturalborncitizen/TheWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyandHowofNBC-WhitePaper.pdf
The Democrat Party and Harris’ operatives have used extensive “law-fare” against you to sabotage and suppress your candidacy and to try to keep you off the ballot in many states. It is time for you to return the “legal fire”; and legally, constitutionally challenge Kamala Harris’ constitutional eligibility status as she is only an “Anchor Baby” kind of Citizen at best. She is not born with or holding sole allegiance to the USA. She is a dual-Citizen via and at birth due to her foreign Jamaican national Marxist father who was only temporarily sojourning in the USA on a student VISA when Kamala was born. Her foreign national mother was also only here on a temporary student VISA. Here parents were not U.S. citizens when Kamala was born. Nor were Kamala’s parents legally permanently domiciled in the USA. They were alien nationals temporarily sojourning in the USA on student VISAs.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
No it doesn't, and I can show you several examples of this. Aldo Mario Bellei comes to mind.
"Natural born citizen" means you are a citizen naturally, and do not require any law or manmade statute to be a citizen.
You don't need a naturalization law to be a citizen, you don't need a constitutional amendment like the 14th to be a citizen, you are a citizen through the operation of nature and of natural law.
You may be shocked to learn that there were natural born citizens before there were any laws to create "citizens."
So how can the two things be the same?
No one votes for VP slot, so they have zero votes each.
Thank you.
Once? Trump usually covers the same material over and over at his rallies and interviews, but this doesn’t seem to be in the rotation much. Nothing like when he used to question where Obama was born. Oh well, I’ll just assume he had focus groups and legal look at it and told him not to do it, because it is a big question.
If that’s your story I suggest you stick to it.
The 14th Amendment doesn’t grant citizenship. Either citizenship is natural or naturalization laws (USC 8 for us today) come into effect.
She was born in California. There’s not a court in America that would consider her, and every person born in America to immigrant parents, to not have natural born citizenship.
Do you use a brand name crystal ball or a generic one?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.