Posted on 07/17/2024 10:14:31 PM PDT by John Robinson
We know the FBI develops "domestic terrorists" with the intent of capturing them in the act, to give themselves a great big pat on the back, push the "rightwing extremism" narrative ("but the shooter was Republican!"), and to justify budget increases.
Let's say the FBI was grooming this kid. They didn't intend for an assassination. But, of course, government is incompetent so it got away from them. (See Fast and Furious, et al.)
Now, let's assume this scheme was passed along outside and upwards of the agency, to somebody with great power, enough to influence choices within multiple agencies, or even only the USSS. If somebody knew the FBI was hatching a scheme, and because we only needed to rely on malicious compliance to get the desired kill shot, it would be pretty easy for just one or few individuals to ensure the Grade F (JB) team who hated Trump would be assigned this particular task.
That's one or very few people required to possibly effect an assassination.
To explain things like shorting DJT, that could simply be an act of insider knowledge to influence a trade, could be sourced from within the Crooks grooming FBI, or somebody who noticed a brewing flustercluck of an assignment in Trump's security detail, who also is aware of the tinderbox of a political environment currently. Actually, it seems a tipoff to an intentional weakened security detail could have alerted many others (photogs, camera crew, etc.) to take a special interest in this Butler event.
I don't buy anything these agencies say, they gaslight us profusely. But I can't do these all-encompassing conspiracy theories involving dozens if not hundreds of people. That's not how the world works. Just a few rogue people with the right knowledge and evil intention is all that is necessary. Maybe it's just two lovers texting about insurance policies?
Does this idea hold water?
If I’m reading it right the other shorts were when the Merchan trial started. Is that right?
Is your paragraph about the FBI knowing Crooks documented, or speculation?
Do you have a link to that video?
So does this mean there wasn’t any actual shorting?
>> it’s possible this atrocity was financed and planned by Muslim extremists.
It’s conceivable that Crooks might have been recruited and/or groomed by muslim extremists.
But it’s not likely (in my opinion) that muslim extremists could have facilitated, or even predicted, the deliberate “negligence” in leaving the shooting post unsecured.
In my opinion, only intelligence agency plus fbi could BOTH recruit the shooter AND ensure him a shooting position. And BOTH are required.
Who was with him at the gun range days prior? A handler verifying his shooting skills?
I have no idea how the mechanics of these transactions work, or this site, tbh. I'm only passing along information from the traders on X, in hopes somebody here can shed light on it.
A conspiracy …I’m not inclined to believe that. However, there are a lot of loose ends. For example, how was this 20 year old loser able to access a conveniently unsecured rooftop and despite being seen as much as 20 minutes before the shooting was not stopped before getting off the shot? The shooter appeared to have a family of modest means so where did someone get the money for a relatively expensive rifle and why was this particular rifle picked? Of course the FBI “investigation” will reach the foregone conclusion that the shooter was a lone wolf and not aided or abetted by anyone. The utter failure of the Secret Service will also be whitewashed. Nothing to see here citizens …move along.
DPMS AR-15 5.56 was probably less than $400 when it was purchased in 2013. Even the high end ones would probably have been $1000 or so. Hardly unaffordable for a family with income from two professionals. Note that dad owned around 20 guns.
Listening to Bongino's show, there's a theory being hashed out internally within the USSS:
Shooter was there for a mass casualty event. At some point, he began evading police, in doing so, he climbed an air conditioning unit to the roof of that building (early reporting suggests this as well); discovered he had LOS on Trump; took the shot. That's plausible, but doesn't fix any of the problems with that day, nor Cheeto's gaslighting. Yeah, the whitewash pours forth. We'll never know, and we'll never trust what is said. Loss-loss for the nation. Or, just another day in Bidentown.
Is it this one? https://x.com/legislationpage/status/1813965738170003772
It’s probably a video encoding artifact. The resolution is bad, zoomed after encoding. Also, there’s no muzzle flash.
No, it wasn’t that one. The one I was thinking of had a small black speck on the top of the water tower that was there in some frames then disappeared.
The video John posted is a lot more detailed and there’s no mistaking that for a human form up there.
BUT, I don’t recall the water tank having that appurtenance on top of it. I just tried to find pics of the Butlerville water tower, but didn’t have any luck looking for a still photo or a video on YT.
I’ll go back through my material to find the original video I saw.
There’s another video here and photos of the water tower (with a star logo) as well.
https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1813918540636049839
The female agents were terrible by & large.
DEI will be the death of us.
Excellent question.
The star logo makes sense to me but the idea of the shadow at the very top changing like that doesn’t make sense to me. Shadows from the sun don’t move around like that, on a stationary object.
For what it’s worth, Erik Prince says it was somebody on the water tower who shot and killed the guy they’re calling Crooks. I don’t know what evidence he uses to support that.
It is, indeed. With the datamining and AI, it is easy for interested intel people to find whatever they want to about people, and the technologies to manipulate the minds of not just the whole society (which they’ve been doing for a long time) but also distinct individuals makes possible unthinkable things.
When Wikileaks exposed Vault 7 - the intel community’s toolbox for their potentially black ops - it exposed the ability to plant evidence on computers, frame people through electronic “fingerprints”, sabotage computer systems to crash cars, etc. What nobody asked is why they developed those abilities if they didn’t intend to use them, and exactly who they are using them on. The same question could be asked about MK Ultra, these microwave technologies (openly acknowledged by the use of the term “Havana Syndrome”), etc.
As a people we are being extremely naive if we believe that an intel community that has no accountability would develop these powerful tools and then only use them on “bad people” and not on anybody who wants to hold them accountable (like Donald Trump).
The swamp knows they use these tools to retaliate. Chuck Schumer publicly said they have “six ways from Sunday of getting back at you.” The Deep State doesn’t mind the Congress-critters knowing they’re crooks who steal, kill, and destroy with immunity, because the fear of them keeps anybody from prosecuting them and putting an end to all this. They WANT the Congress-critters, DOJ, SCOTUS, etc to be afraid of them, just like the mafia wanted people to see their violence. Even if everybody knew who did the violence, nobody would be willing to prosecute it.
It’s a digital ghost. A lossy video compression algorithm on the source video leaving digital artifacts + a digital zoom with pixel smoothing (creating new pixels) which itself causes digital artifacts + a lossy compression algorithm on the newly zoomed video leaving digital artifacts. Where’s the muzzle flash? People are seeing ghosts.
They have a confirmed history. There have been committees and sternly written words. I also believe it is legal for the TLAs to employ propaganda against American people within the borders of our nation. (Pretty sure I heard that from one of my lawtubers, but don’t remember the specifics.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.