|
Posted on 06/13/2024 8:18:21 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
FROM AN EMAIL:
https://badlands.substack.com/p/q-is-real-because-math-says-so
Q is Real, Because Math Says So. Time to Put an End to All Doubt
BY AMERICAN HYPNOTIST
Greetings Friends,
I’m going to make a bold claim: the only way a person could doubt that Q is a legitimate insider is if they don’t understand Q.
Put another way, when someone claims that Q is just a “LARP” (an actor, in other words), then this alone shows you that they have no idea what they’re talking about.
I don’t intend to be rude per se—however, considering the derisive treatment of Q supporters by the “anti Q” world (comprising of many on both sides of the political aisle), I don’t plan on sparing anyone’s feelings, either. When people lambaste Q supporters for being “stupid” or “lazy” or “crazy”, they’re behaving in the precisely same manner as the left does when they baselessly accuse Trump supporters of being dumb, evil, etc.
Condemnation or dismissal without sufficient cause should NOT be the standard way that people deal with each other—nor should it be the standard method by which logical proposals are evaluated. If one is going to paint one’s countrymen with broad brushstrokes as dumb or crazy, then such an accusation should be founded upon a legitimate review of objective evidence. Society cannot function—let alone improve—when feelings supersede rationality.
My challenge to all who would say that Q is nothing more than a LARP is this: can you provide a workable mathematic/statistical model that compels us to assume Q is “fake”, rather than a legitimate insider connected to Trump?
If one intends to dismiss or debunk Q, then it’s nothing short of mandatory to answer this question. Not a SINGLE detractor has ever produced such a model in the past six and a half years since Q first appeared on the scene.
...MORE
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/msnbcs-joy-reid-finds-it-deeply-offensive-that/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/can-biden-resist-calling-trump-nazi/
It’s plane to see.
Nice catch.
MarQ
“It’s plane to see.”
I give you turbo props for noticing!
25A is a bummer, but both sides of the aisle would be happy to expedite it, or, if Democrats really want a candidate to try and win, they will give Jill an offer she can’t refuse and Biden will accept it.
I AM!!!
At best, Vivek & Tulsi are each a stranger in the house. Our bench is deep enough to give place to a family member, if you know what I mean.
They are working hard for POTUS Trump 👏 but, neither have yet won a Republican election. They have some time to win at something Republican.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
