Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/06/2024 9:16:12 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

With this latest advance, I’d estimate that we are only 25 years away from fusion power.


2 posted on 05/06/2024 9:17:32 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (It's not "Quiet Quitting" -- it's "Going Galt".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Relying on 1.15 gigajoules of power

That's slightly more than I can come up with.
3 posted on 05/06/2024 9:22:20 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“the difference between taming a tiger in the wild versus a small kitten within your home.”

I’m not sure which way this analogy cuts.

Has anyone ever successfully trained a cat to do anything it doesn’t want to do?


7 posted on 05/06/2024 9:28:17 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Why will we never have commercially viable fusion power? Because you can’t make nuclear weapons from the byproducts. So regimes like Iran can’t say that they want “nuclear power” for their people when they REALLY want to become a “nuclear power”.


8 posted on 05/06/2024 9:29:44 AM PDT by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I hope commercial fusion power is developed in time to charge my electric flying car from my convenient 13,000 Amp home charger...


9 posted on 05/06/2024 9:32:13 AM PDT by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
"“This innovative capability is now ready to be exported
to many machines in the U.S. and around the
world,” Delgado-Aparicio said ..."

Why? Why export this "innovative technique" to the
the rest of the world? Let the the rest of the world
spend their money and use their resources and time
to figure it out. America must stop being Uncle Sucker
to the rest of the world. The rest of the world is looting
the USA with the help of our caring political
establishment.

11 posted on 05/06/2024 9:32:39 AM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

New!


12 posted on 05/06/2024 9:39:07 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
wild, baby.


15 posted on 05/06/2024 9:55:03 AM PDT by xoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

tungsten melts at 6,192°F, how does it does it shed the heat?


17 posted on 05/06/2024 10:06:46 AM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
1.15 gigajoules divided by 360 seconds is...

3,194,444 watts.

That's a little over 3 megawatts!!

That's not even a tenth of a gigawatt!

Wait I gotta find my slide rule to check that result.

19 posted on 05/06/2024 10:15:23 AM PDT by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

a device internally clad in tungsten,


https://www.bulbs.com/learning/incandescent.aspx

An incandescent bulb typically consists of a glass enclosure containing a tungsten filament. An electric current passes through the filament, heating it to a temperature that produces light.


27 posted on 05/06/2024 11:14:53 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
...to sustain hot fusion plasma nearing temperatures of 50 million degrees Celsius for a record-breaking six minutes.

Velly Intelestingk...I don't know, but I've been told fusion in captivity requires around 100 million Celsius get started.

30 posted on 05/06/2024 12:21:24 PM PDT by PerConPat (The politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
It's not if, it's when.
38 posted on 05/06/2024 8:05:32 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“could”, “might”, “possibly”........yawn


40 posted on 05/06/2024 11:53:55 PM PDT by 1756-L85E
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I don’t claim to understand this, but the idea of stripping off a neutron to make energy reminds me a bit of the Pons and Fleisher Cold Fusion.

Alternative to fusion, one-neutron stripping beats powerful nuclear reaction
An underdog nuclear reaction can produce as good output as the popular nuclear fusion.
https://interestingengineering.com/science/neutron-stripping-output-nuclear-fusion
Updated: Jun 22, 2024 08:17 AM EST


41 posted on 06/23/2024 9:40:45 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson