Posted on 04/22/2024 12:03:39 AM PDT by Morgana
As previously reported, Operation Rescue has seen an increase in medical emergencies since the overturn of Roe v. Wade, especially in leftist cities and states that have turned into abortion destinations – such as Illinois.
This time, on-site pro-life eyewitnesses saw two emergencies on the same day at the University of New Mexico Center for Reproductive Health in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The information was provided by Abortion Free New Mexico.
First Emergency:
According to eyewitnesses, a woman was taken to an ambulance on a gurney around 2:30 p.m. on April 10, 2024. Another ambulance, a police car and a fire engine were also on the scene.
Second Emergency:
That same day, less than two hours later, at around 4 p.m., a second ambulance was seen at the abortion facility to transport another woman to the emergency room.
Unknowns:
The condition of both women remains unknown.
Operation Rescue is trying to obtain 911 records for both emergencies from the city of Albuquerque and the Albuquerque Fire Department. Nevertheless, based on previous requests, a total or partial denial of records is expected. Operation Rescue’s team has seen this pattern in many abortion destination cities where the abortion cartel is not held accountable.
Over and over again, women are injured – or worse – by abortion. Yet what happens to them gets covered up, swept away, and quietly erased in a disappearing act. The public deserves to know how dangerous abortion is, and yet public records frequently are withheld, denied, or mysteriously missing.
This silence costs women and babies.
“We continue to see an increase in medical emergencies like these while the traditional media, liberal groups, and their allies remain silent,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “Meanwhile women keep getting hurt. But we will move forward with our work exposing the truth of what the abortion cartel does not want the public to know about abortion. We pray for these women who were injured, though the condition of each remains unclear. And, we will keep fighting by all legal means for life.”
Are some of these abortions complicated because the women took the pills later than they should or some other way not recommended by the manufacturer and not monitored by a physician?
“There are these stories about stockpiling of abortion pills. Are women taking these pills every morning after they have unprotected sex, just in case?”
I never thought about that but probably
“Are some of these abortions complicated because the women took the pills later than they should or some other way not recommended by the manufacturer and not monitored by a physician?”
No these are actually abortion clinic disasters.
Abortion is always dangerous for the baby. It’s always dangerous for women, too, but most end up OK physically.
That whole process could be very messy and dangerous.
Would it be safe to say more women are dying getting an abortion then not getting abortions?
The demand for abortion would go waay down.
An argument can be made that having a child holds more risk for the man - as he now has to contribute support for 18 years.
It’s always dangerous for women, too, but most end up OK physically.
...
Respectfully submitted...
Yes, it’s always dangerous for those women, many of whom can never, ever, carry a baby to term after, a couple of these “procedures”
...please don’t ask me how I know.
Almost all vasectomies can be reversed. However, this doesn't guarantee success in conceiving a child. Vasectomy reversal can be attempted even if several years have passed since the original vasectomy — but the longer it has been, the less likely it is that the reversal will work.
Vasectomy reversal rarely leads to serious complications.
Vasectomies are not risk-free, but the downsides are no picnic either: becoming a father when you may not want to be, or creating a life that will potentially be aborted.
The blame isn’t on the men - it’s equally on both partners. But at least on FR, the pro-life threads invariably neglect to mention that a man was even involved.
”Putting the blame on men is disingenuous since they are on the hook for child support while the female can just legally kill the unborn offspring at will”
If they don’t want to be on the hook for child support - then they either stay away from the booty - OR - use protection. That’s the whole point! It goes without saying that both partners need to take precautions. Women who are sexually active need to plan as well.
The woman has to support the child, so she is also ‘on the hook’ for the exact same thing that the man is.
The decision is not only up to the woman - “before she got pregnant and after.” You’re describing a scenario where the man has no responsibility at all.
That particular viewpoint is one of the reasons causing the frequency of abortions we have today: using it as a method of birth control. That’s on both partners.
In general, it’s men’s stronger sex drive that results in them pushing women into sex. And that’s just a fact of life. It happens and I’ve had more than enough guys try it on me. And I have other friends who had it done to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.