Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
expose-news.co ^ | 3/27/2024 | The Exposé

Posted on 03/29/2024 11:21:39 AM PDT by ransomnote

Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine

By on March 27, 2024

Cancer genomics expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults recently testified to the South Carolina Senate about the DNA contamination found in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. There are an estimated 200 billion pieces of plasmid DNA in each dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, he said.  These pieces of DNA are packaged in lipid nanoparticles, basically a synthetic virus, and are delivered into vaccinees’ cells.



Dr. Phillip Buckhaults is a Professor at the University of South Carolina.  He has a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology and conducts cancer genomics research.  What that effectively means is he and his team are specialists at detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they are not supposed to be.

On 12 September, he testified before the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on the Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”).

“The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. It’s not just mRNA, it’s got bits of DNA in it.” Prof. Buckhaults said.

A colleague who was in charge of the vaccination programme in Columbia, South Carolina,  kept all the Pfizer vials, containing remnants of the contents, from the two batches that were used.  From the remnants, Prof. Buckhaults sequenced all the DNA that was in these vials. “I can see what’s in [the vaccines] and it’s surprising that there’s any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there and I’m kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this both in terms of human health and biology,” he said.

“This DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest.

“This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix … we do this in the lab all the time; we take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex, like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells.  And a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell.  It’s not just a temporary thing.  It is in that cell from now on and all of its progeny from now on and forever more …  So, that’s why I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It’s different from RNA because it can be permanent.”

Based on solid molecular biology, it is a theoretical but reasonable concern that this DNA could cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue, he said.

“It’s also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands it can interrupt a tumour suppressor or activate an oncogene,” he added. “I think it’ll be rare but I think the risk is not zero.”

“DNA is a long-lived,” Prof. Buckhaults explained.  “What you were born with you’re going to die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for hundreds of thousands of years … So, alterations to the DNA – they stick around.”

Prof. Buckhaults explained that there are a LOT of pieces of DNA in Pfizer’s vaccines.  Although some are 5,000 and 500 base pairs long, most of the pieces are around 100 base pairs. But this is irrelevant because the probability of a piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size.  “Your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are,” he said. “All these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine [give] many many thousands of opportunities to modify a cell of a vaccinated person.”

“The pieces are very small because during the process they chopped them up to try to make them go away – but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in the process.”

Prof. Buckhaults’ team took all these little pieces of DNA and “glued them together” to try to establish its source.  After putting together 100,000 pieces of DNA they were able to establish it came from a plasmid that can be purchased online from Agilent, a Californian life sciences company which was established in 1999 as a spin-off from Hewlett Packard.

“It’s clear that Pfizer took this plasmid and then they cloned spike into it and they used it in a process … where you feed an RNA polymerase, this plasmid, and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies … and then you take this mRNA and you mix it with the lipid nanoparticle transfection agent and now you’ve got your mRNA vaccine.  But they failed to get the DNA out before they did this … they did make some effort to chop it up so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the RNA.  That’s clear as day what happened just from the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing,” Prof. Buckhaults said.

He explained that this process was not the same as the process that was in the vaccines used to gain emergency authorisation (“EUA”).  So, there was no DNA in the batches used for the trials before the mass COVID-19 injection campaigns. The problem with DNA contamination only occurred when Pfizer scaled up production for the administration of millions/billions of doses to the public after it had gained EUA.

“We can quantify how much of this [DNA] is in a vaccine … I estimate that there were about two billion copies of the one piece [of the plasmid] that we’re looking for in every dose … If you see two billion copies of [one piece] … [then] there’s probably about 200 billion of pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine,” Prof. Buckhaults said.

The hundreds of billions of pieces of plasmid DNA are encapsulated in the lipid nanoparticles so it’s ready to be delivered into the cell.  “This is a bad idea,” he said.  “[The DNA is] basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell.”

He recommended that some vaccinated people be tested to see if the plasmid DNA is integrating into their genomes.  This harm you can prove.  With other vaccine harms you can be suspicious because of the timing but you can’t really prove it. “This one you can prove it because it leaves a calling card.  [If] you find it in the stem cells of harmed people, it’s equivalent to finding a certain type of lead in someone who is now dead, it’s pretty reasonable to assume that that’s what caused it,” he said.



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: clickbaitadspam; covid; frindecline; hahabigpharmatroll; hahaqtards; junksource; mrna; pfizer; qvirus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: rdcbn1

“This is all good and well. But will it all come soon enough to help those that the mRNA vaccines is causing cancer”

Put down the bottle.


41 posted on 03/29/2024 1:21:24 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine, TexasGator wrote:

“FactCheck.org is a smear tool used by the medical regime and other Deep Stater efforts.”

I noticed that you agreed with them. Thanks

Nope - you just agree with a troll who fabricated a statement and attributed it to me. I guess that makes you twins.

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/10/scicheck-covid-19-vaccines-have-not-been-shown-to-alter-dna-cause-cancer/

Your source is propaganda - I just posted to that effect here.

The medical regime will not test for alteration of DNA so they can say it has not been shown to alter DNA.

42 posted on 03/29/2024 1:22:36 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MikelTackNailer

“The cat’s definitely out of the bag now, and that’s a great thing.”

The doctor said he would recommend the vaccine to his parents.


43 posted on 03/29/2024 1:22:47 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
“He [Dr. Phillip Buckhaults] also said that he did not intend for his comments “to be widely circulated in the public and compromising people’s confidence in vaccines.”

I have to admit, I'd be a little more interested in the concern if he took a garden variety flu shot from 5 years ago and verified that it had NO DNA in it.
44 posted on 03/29/2024 1:23:48 PM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“Your source is propaganda “

And you agreed with it.


45 posted on 03/29/2024 1:24:40 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BikerJoe

“I have to admit, I’d be a little more interested in the concern if he took a garden variety flu shot from 5 years ago and verified that it had NO DNA in it.”

Several other shots that have been around for decades have DNA due to being cultured in cells. That is why the FDA sets an upper limit on the amount.


46 posted on 03/29/2024 1:27:49 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“Based on solid molecular biology, it is a theoretical but reasonable concern that this DNA could cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue, he said.”

He said that the immune system was not his area of expertise.


47 posted on 03/29/2024 1:31:37 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

“This guy has a PhD in Molecular Biology. He performs genomic cancer research. He IS the scientist. And he is NOT being paid by the Drug Companies to write this article.

Do yourself a favor and read the article. That way you can stop sounding like an idiot.”

The doctor did not write the article!

The doctor stated his information should not be used to undermine our confidence in the vaccinations.


48 posted on 03/29/2024 1:36:17 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
“there is a strong likelihood that different fragments of varying DNA sequence can be incorporated into a persons DNA “

Since no person with a medical background has stated this I say you are making it up.


Not making anything up. Just pointing out a logical outcome of the circumstances.

We already know beyond any shadow of a doubt that the replication of spike protein was far from perfect which resulted in large numbers of transcription errors in the production of the spike proteins used as antigens.

This flooded peoples bodies with not just the spike protein which was bad enough, but with all kinds of other unique synthetic proteins with unknown and unpredictable bio mimicking potential.

if you have 400 + billion (200B per shot for 2 shots) random DNA fragments circulating in your body, there is going a random incorporation of random fragments into an individuals DNA on a strand by strand basis in a person's DNA .

Am not what the consequences of this random alteration might be, given that we don't really understand all the ways DNA functions and expresses, but am of the opinion that it may not be a good thing in some circumstances.

49 posted on 03/29/2024 1:37:22 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Not sure who to believe anymore but I’m glad I decided not to get the shot. Only time will tell the rest of the story!


50 posted on 03/29/2024 1:39:16 PM PDT by parmamenian (and so it goes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Oh, and by the way, Mr Gator - not only have I stayed in more than few Holiday Inns over the years , I also have a pretty credible biomedical engineering and biochemistry background, and I have been involved in both pure and clinical research for a number of decades and have even actually established a couple of research labs over the years.

Not sure that qualifies me as an expert on much of anything, but it does give me a credible basis to to formulate a reasonable and plausible hypothesis

51 posted on 03/29/2024 1:52:18 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

The Nano-Lipid packaging was never studied, properly. The study is being performed, in real time, with all the poor souls, who chose become a test subject.


52 posted on 03/29/2024 2:00:05 PM PDT by mazz44 (http://knowledgeofhealth.com/why-animals-age-they-produce-less-vitamin-c-same-for-humans/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mazz44
Yup. not sure whether mRNA technology is the silver bullet that many have touted it as, but it seems that the current state of the art tech is nowhere near advanced and stable enough for wide spread use, especially as a vaccines.

Not to say that it may not have legit applications for specially targeted therapies for serious illness.

For example, if there is an effective mRNA therapy for Neuroblastoma I can't see how mRNA might be justified because the use is restricted to a single individual who has a pretty poor prognosis.

But injecting experimental, untested mRNA along with all it's impurities into literally billions of people, including pregnant women, babies and young children, young adults and people under 50 years of age who are at virtually zero risk of serious covid complications was simply crazy.

And now we are learning it may also have been very ill advised and potentially dangerous.

53 posted on 03/29/2024 2:14:09 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Modified Experimental RNA: ModERNA


54 posted on 03/29/2024 2:18:58 PM PDT by IAGeezer912 (One out of every 20 people on the face of the earth are Americans. We have won life's lottery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Pfizer vaccine kept people out of the cemetery.

Wut???????

It's not a vaccine regardless of what the CDC changed their definition to and it's already been shown to have a negative efficacy.

Again, negative efficacy, meaning it had zero ability to keep anyone out of a cemetery.

...putting them in is the real story.

55 posted on 03/29/2024 3:18:09 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

PFIZER finally admitted their “TESTING” used a total of 23 persons.


56 posted on 03/29/2024 3:46:30 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
In our lifetime we will see have already seen mRNA vaccines experiments curing causing cancers.
57 posted on 03/29/2024 5:14:10 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

I can’t prove it but . . . (I’m not an ‘expert’)

I’m losing count of the friends, acquaintences and coworkers that have “died suddenly”, presumably from the clot shot; my sister (thirteen years my junior), several biker buddies, neighbors, all of which were REQUIRED to get the vaccination to remain employed. I quit and retired early to avoid getting the shot of death.

I remain NON-GMO. I WILL NOT voluntarily take any further shots from any health scare organizations ever again!

I hope you are doing well, and that 2024 is a better year for you than the previous one . . .

I wear my SUBHUMAN patch proudly on my cut.


58 posted on 03/29/2024 5:50:27 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; Salamander; Jane Long
What are you referring to?

For all your sense of self worth, you are as dense as a six foot block of lead. Please find another thread to elucidate others of your superior knowledge and intellect.

59 posted on 03/29/2024 6:11:48 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I don’t think I’ve ever discussed anything with you directly, but I’ve seen a number of your comments regarding the whole COVID thing for a while. I’m curious if you have any reservations about the MRNA shots at all. You seem to be wholeheartedly in favor of them, as if they can’t possibly have any defects, despite being experimental in nature. Am I wrong about that?


60 posted on 03/29/2024 8:15:00 PM PDT by fr_freak (So foul a sky clears not without a storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson