Posted on 03/29/2024 11:21:39 AM PDT by ransomnote
Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
Maybe someone with a proper computer will do it up for me.
:)
“Safe, effective, but deadly down the line?”
Dr. Phillip Buckhault:
I would gladly take mRNA vaccine without DNA strands.
Even knowing about the DNA contamination I would recommend it to my parents.
Pfizer vaccine kept people out of the cemetery.
In our lifetime we will see mRNA vaccines curing cancers.
Buckhaults makes a compelling argument but avoids what he really wants to say or stating the implications of what he’s saying because he’s beholden to so much federal research grant money. He attempts to walk a very fine line.
Ignorance is bliss no doubt.
“Ignorance is bliss no doubt.”
What are you referring to?
Dr. Phillip Buckhault:
I would gladly take mRNA vaccine without DNA strands.
Even knowing about the DNA contamination I would recommend it to my parents.
Pfizer vaccine kept people out of the cemetery.
In our lifetime we will see mRNA vaccines curing cancers.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine, Deaf Smith wrote: We were publicly told in early 2021 that the China Virus shot is Experimental Gene Therapy. After a few weeks passed, that information was omitted.
Omitted then hotly denied, with trolls screeching that saying it was gene therapy was an ignorant lie if not intentional disinformation. I did find an FTC filing for one of the COvid 'shots' which specified that it is indeed gene therapy but would be allowed to be marketed otherwise in order to avoid 'vaccine hesitancy'. You know - if the customer knows what's in it they may not want it.....
As we’ve discussed above, changing a person’s DNA is not easy. The residual DNA would first need to get into a cell. This could happen if the DNA was inside one of the fatty bubbles called lipid nanoparticles used to package the mRNA in the vaccines, Veldhoen, the immunologist in Portugal, said. But even if this happened, the DNA would only end up in the cytoplasm, the region of a cell outside the nucleus.
Next, any residual DNA that made it into a cell would need to get access to a person’s DNA in the nucleus and insert itself. In general, a cell needs to be in the process of dividing for foreign DNA to integrate into the cell’s own DNA.
The mRNA vaccines are injected into the muscles, where the bulk of the vaccine remains. Muscle cells “do not divide rapidly and have lots of cytoplasm compared to the size of their nuclei,” Milavetz, the molecular biologist at the University of North Dakota, said. This means that it is “very unlikely” that any residual DNA from a vaccine introduced to the cytoplasm of a cell will make it into the nucleus and insert itself into the DNA there in the first place, he added.
“Even if it enters the nucleus, which it probably can’t, it would still have to be integrated into DNA, which requires an integrase, which it also doesn’t have,” Offit said. An integrase is an enzyme some viruses use to insert themselves into cellular DNA.
In the event that some residual DNA did manage to insert into a person’s DNA, it would need to be exactly the wrong kind of DNA, land in exactly the wrong place or a combination of the two.
And then, if this entire sequence of events occurred in one of a person’s trillions of cells, the cell would need to avoid destruction by the immune system, divide and give rise to other cells, which would need to continue along the path toward becoming cancerous.
In reality, the immune system can detect when cells take up foreign DNA or mRNA, Veldhoen said. In the end, cells that had taken up residual DNA would not survive, he said, and the DNA bits would be “broken down, its individual parts recycled.”
“He [Dr. Phillip Buckhaults] also said that he did not intend for his comments “to be widely circulated in the public and compromising people’s confidence in vaccines.”
So-o-o ... if you took the clot shot you shouldn’t be too surprised to notice that growing bump right above your butt krak could be a prehensile tail ...
...jus’ sayin’ ...
“So-o-o ... if you took the clot shot you shouldn’t be too surprised to notice that growing bump right above your butt krak could be a prehensile tail ...
...jus’ sayin’ ...”
Why would you say something like that?
Can anyone tell us Avogadro’s number?
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine, TexasGator wrote: “He [Dr. Phillip Buckhaults] also said that he did not intend for his comments “to be widely circulated in the public and compromising people’s confidence in vaccines.”
Sounds like the medical regime was applying the thumbscrews accusing him of promoting 'vaccine hesitancy'. I wonder if he will 'get' to keep his medical license?
FactCheck.org is a smear tool used by the medical regime and other Deep Stater efforts.
University That Funds Biden's Think Tank And Hosts FactCheck.Org Has Contract With BioNTech, Gets Paid For Vaccine Sales And FDA Approvals 02/09/2022 9:33:36 AM PST · by Golden Eagle · 14 repliesThe National File ^ | Feb 6, 2022 | Patrick Howley
Documents obtained by NATIONAL FILE show that the University of Pennsylvania, which hosts and funds Joe Biden’s think tank called the Penn Biden Center, directly profits from the sale of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Coronavirus vaccines. The University gets more money if more vaccines are sold. The University of Pennsylvania also gets “milestone payments” when the Biden administration’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves a Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which represents a massive conflict of interest for Biden. .... NATIONAL FILE’s source explained to us that “UPenn earns massive payments (actual terms confidential, likely in the billions)” from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. .......EXPOSED: Facebook’s Independent COVID Fact-checker Site FactCheck.org Funded By $1.9 Billion Vaccine Lobby 10/15/2021 11:06:38 PM PDT · by ransomnote · 25 repliesgreatgameindia.com ^ | April 28, 2021 | greatgameindia.com
ransomnote: You'd think everyone would know by now that 'fact checkers' are owned and operated by the Big Tech censors and their allies. But still, I sometimes get some posting 'Factcheck.org' to me as if I will collapse in shame for posting something that corrupt organization doesn't approve of. A so-called independent fact-checker website FactCheck.org is exposed to be funded by the same $1.9 billion vaccine lobby group that it is supposed to check. The site is a Facebook partner whose articles are used to censor critical voices on the social media platform. It is headed by the former CDC...FactCheck.org’s COVID-19 Project is Funded by Foundation That Has 15 Percent of Its Assets in Johnson and Johnson Stock 04/24/2021 8:42:56 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 12 repliesBig League Politics ^ | 04/24/2021 | Evan James
A FactCheck.org project addressing common COVID-19 “misconceptions” owes its existence to a philanthropic organization that has around 15 percent of its assets tied up in Johnson & Johnson stock. The top of the project homepage reads as follows: “SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project is made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.” Interestingly enough, Rep. Thomas Massie (KY-04) has discovered that 15.9 percent of the foundation’s assets consist of Johnson & Johnson common stock. Out of $11.9 million in assets, nearly $1.9 million has been invested...
Given that the DNA fragments can be very different, there is a strong likelihood that different fragments of varying DNA sequence can be incorporated into a persons DNA so not only is a person's DNA altered, it is altered in such a way no two strands of that individual person's DNA are the same.
This is bad for an adult, but it could be much worse for a developing fetus, a baby or a child. And we used to worry about the mutagenic effects of nuclear war - this could potentially be as bad or even worse.
“FactCheck.org is a smear tool used by the medical regime and other Deep Stater efforts.”
I noticed that you agreed with them. Thanks
“there is a strong likelihood that different fragments of varying DNA sequence can be incorporated into a persons DNA “
Since no person with a medical background has stated this I say you are making it up.
I would gladly take mRNA vaccine without DNA strands.
Even knowing about the DNA contamination I would recommend it to my parents.
Pfizer vaccine kept people out of the cemetery.
In our lifetime we will see mRNA vaccines curing cancers.
This is all good and well. But will it all come soon enough to help those that the mRNA vaccines is causing cancer
In a lowered voice she said she's not taking it even if it costs her her job.
The cat's definitely out of the bag now, and that's a great thing.
“it is altered in such a way no two strands of that individual person’s DNA are the same.”
Obviously you have never stayed at a Holiday Inn!
Your source is propaganda - I just posted to that effect here.
The medical regime will not test for alteration of DNA so they can say it has not been shown to alter DNA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.