Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
expose-news.co ^ | 3/27/2024 | The Exposé

Posted on 03/29/2024 11:21:39 AM PDT by ransomnote

Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine

By on March 27, 2024

Cancer genomics expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults recently testified to the South Carolina Senate about the DNA contamination found in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. There are an estimated 200 billion pieces of plasmid DNA in each dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, he said.  These pieces of DNA are packaged in lipid nanoparticles, basically a synthetic virus, and are delivered into vaccinees’ cells.



Dr. Phillip Buckhaults is a Professor at the University of South Carolina.  He has a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology and conducts cancer genomics research.  What that effectively means is he and his team are specialists at detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they are not supposed to be.

On 12 September, he testified before the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on the Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”).

“The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. It’s not just mRNA, it’s got bits of DNA in it.” Prof. Buckhaults said.

A colleague who was in charge of the vaccination programme in Columbia, South Carolina,  kept all the Pfizer vials, containing remnants of the contents, from the two batches that were used.  From the remnants, Prof. Buckhaults sequenced all the DNA that was in these vials. “I can see what’s in [the vaccines] and it’s surprising that there’s any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there and I’m kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this both in terms of human health and biology,” he said.

“This DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest.

“This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix … we do this in the lab all the time; we take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex, like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells.  And a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell.  It’s not just a temporary thing.  It is in that cell from now on and all of its progeny from now on and forever more …  So, that’s why I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It’s different from RNA because it can be permanent.”

Based on solid molecular biology, it is a theoretical but reasonable concern that this DNA could cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue, he said.

“It’s also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands it can interrupt a tumour suppressor or activate an oncogene,” he added. “I think it’ll be rare but I think the risk is not zero.”

“DNA is a long-lived,” Prof. Buckhaults explained.  “What you were born with you’re going to die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for hundreds of thousands of years … So, alterations to the DNA – they stick around.”

Prof. Buckhaults explained that there are a LOT of pieces of DNA in Pfizer’s vaccines.  Although some are 5,000 and 500 base pairs long, most of the pieces are around 100 base pairs. But this is irrelevant because the probability of a piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size.  “Your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are,” he said. “All these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine [give] many many thousands of opportunities to modify a cell of a vaccinated person.”

“The pieces are very small because during the process they chopped them up to try to make them go away – but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in the process.”

Prof. Buckhaults’ team took all these little pieces of DNA and “glued them together” to try to establish its source.  After putting together 100,000 pieces of DNA they were able to establish it came from a plasmid that can be purchased online from Agilent, a Californian life sciences company which was established in 1999 as a spin-off from Hewlett Packard.

“It’s clear that Pfizer took this plasmid and then they cloned spike into it and they used it in a process … where you feed an RNA polymerase, this plasmid, and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies … and then you take this mRNA and you mix it with the lipid nanoparticle transfection agent and now you’ve got your mRNA vaccine.  But they failed to get the DNA out before they did this … they did make some effort to chop it up so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the RNA.  That’s clear as day what happened just from the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing,” Prof. Buckhaults said.

He explained that this process was not the same as the process that was in the vaccines used to gain emergency authorisation (“EUA”).  So, there was no DNA in the batches used for the trials before the mass COVID-19 injection campaigns. The problem with DNA contamination only occurred when Pfizer scaled up production for the administration of millions/billions of doses to the public after it had gained EUA.

“We can quantify how much of this [DNA] is in a vaccine … I estimate that there were about two billion copies of the one piece [of the plasmid] that we’re looking for in every dose … If you see two billion copies of [one piece] … [then] there’s probably about 200 billion of pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine,” Prof. Buckhaults said.

The hundreds of billions of pieces of plasmid DNA are encapsulated in the lipid nanoparticles so it’s ready to be delivered into the cell.  “This is a bad idea,” he said.  “[The DNA is] basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell.”

He recommended that some vaccinated people be tested to see if the plasmid DNA is integrating into their genomes.  This harm you can prove.  With other vaccine harms you can be suspicious because of the timing but you can’t really prove it. “This one you can prove it because it leaves a calling card.  [If] you find it in the stem cells of harmed people, it’s equivalent to finding a certain type of lead in someone who is now dead, it’s pretty reasonable to assume that that’s what caused it,” he said.



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: clickbaitadspam; covid; frindecline; hahabigpharmatroll; hahaqtards; junksource; mrna; pfizer; qvirus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Jane Long

Maybe someone with a proper computer will do it up for me.

:)


21 posted on 03/29/2024 12:09:21 PM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page help save my beloved dog's life. https://www.givesendgo.com/G2FUF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

“Safe, effective, but deadly down the line?”

Dr. Phillip Buckhault:

I would gladly take mRNA vaccine without DNA strands.

Even knowing about the DNA contamination I would recommend it to my parents.

Pfizer vaccine kept people out of the cemetery.

In our lifetime we will see mRNA vaccines curing cancers.


22 posted on 03/29/2024 12:26:39 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Buckhaults makes a compelling argument but avoids what he really wants to say or stating the implications of what he’s saying because he’s beholden to so much federal research grant money. He attempts to walk a very fine line.


23 posted on 03/29/2024 12:34:01 PM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Ignorance is bliss no doubt.


24 posted on 03/29/2024 12:34:04 PM PDT by Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl

“Ignorance is bliss no doubt.”

What are you referring to?


25 posted on 03/29/2024 12:39:23 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Dr. Phillip Buckhault:

I would gladly take mRNA vaccine without DNA strands.

Even knowing about the DNA contamination I would recommend it to my parents.

Pfizer vaccine kept people out of the cemetery.

In our lifetime we will see mRNA vaccines curing cancers.


26 posted on 03/29/2024 12:40:14 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine, Deaf Smith wrote:
We were publicly told in early 2021 that the China Virus shot is Experimental Gene Therapy.

After a few weeks passed, that information was omitted.

Omitted then hotly denied, with trolls screeching that saying it was gene therapy was an ignorant lie if not intentional disinformation. I did find an FTC filing for one of the COvid 'shots' which specified that it is indeed gene therapy but would be allowed to be marketed otherwise in order to avoid 'vaccine hesitancy'. You know - if the customer knows what's in it they may not want it.....


27 posted on 03/29/2024 12:46:15 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

As we’ve discussed above, changing a person’s DNA is not easy. The residual DNA would first need to get into a cell. This could happen if the DNA was inside one of the fatty bubbles called lipid nanoparticles used to package the mRNA in the vaccines, Veldhoen, the immunologist in Portugal, said. But even if this happened, the DNA would only end up in the cytoplasm, the region of a cell outside the nucleus.

Next, any residual DNA that made it into a cell would need to get access to a person’s DNA in the nucleus and insert itself. In general, a cell needs to be in the process of dividing for foreign DNA to integrate into the cell’s own DNA.

The mRNA vaccines are injected into the muscles, where the bulk of the vaccine remains. Muscle cells “do not divide rapidly and have lots of cytoplasm compared to the size of their nuclei,” Milavetz, the molecular biologist at the University of North Dakota, said. This means that it is “very unlikely” that any residual DNA from a vaccine introduced to the cytoplasm of a cell will make it into the nucleus and insert itself into the DNA there in the first place, he added.

“Even if it enters the nucleus, which it probably can’t, it would still have to be integrated into DNA, which requires an integrase, which it also doesn’t have,” Offit said. An integrase is an enzyme some viruses use to insert themselves into cellular DNA.

In the event that some residual DNA did manage to insert into a person’s DNA, it would need to be exactly the wrong kind of DNA, land in exactly the wrong place or a combination of the two.

And then, if this entire sequence of events occurred in one of a person’s trillions of cells, the cell would need to avoid destruction by the immune system, divide and give rise to other cells, which would need to continue along the path toward becoming cancerous.

In reality, the immune system can detect when cells take up foreign DNA or mRNA, Veldhoen said. In the end, cells that had taken up residual DNA would not survive, he said, and the DNA bits would be “broken down, its individual parts recycled.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/10/scicheck-covid-19-vaccines-have-not-been-shown-to-alter-dna-cause-cancer/


28 posted on 03/29/2024 12:53:44 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“He [Dr. Phillip Buckhaults] also said that he did not intend for his comments “to be widely circulated in the public and compromising people’s confidence in vaccines.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/10/scicheck-covid-19-vaccines-have-not-been-shown-to-alter-dna-cause-cancer/


29 posted on 03/29/2024 12:56:54 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

So-o-o ... if you took the clot shot you shouldn’t be too surprised to notice that growing bump right above your butt krak could be a prehensile tail ...

...jus’ sayin’ ...


30 posted on 03/29/2024 1:03:21 PM PDT by ByteMercenary (Cho Bi Dung and KamalHo are not my leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ByteMercenary

“So-o-o ... if you took the clot shot you shouldn’t be too surprised to notice that growing bump right above your butt krak could be a prehensile tail ...

...jus’ sayin’ ...”

Why would you say something like that?


31 posted on 03/29/2024 1:08:49 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Can anyone tell us Avogadro’s number?


32 posted on 03/29/2024 1:09:53 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine, TexasGator wrote:

“He [Dr. Phillip Buckhaults] also said that he did not intend for his comments “to be widely circulated in the public and compromising people’s confidence in vaccines.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/10/scicheck-covid-19-vaccines-have-not-been-shown-to-alter-dna-cause-cancer/

 

Sounds like the medical regime was applying the thumbscrews accusing him of promoting 'vaccine hesitancy'. I wonder if he will 'get' to keep his medical license?

FactCheck.org is a smear tool used by the medical regime and other Deep Stater efforts.

University That Funds Biden's Think Tank And Hosts FactCheck.Org Has Contract With BioNTech, Gets Paid For Vaccine Sales And FDA Approvals
 
02/09/2022 9:33:36 AM PST · by Golden Eagle · 14 replies
The National File ^ | Feb 6, 2022 | Patrick Howley
Documents obtained by NATIONAL FILE show that the University of Pennsylvania, which hosts and funds Joe Biden’s think tank called the Penn Biden Center, directly profits from the sale of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Coronavirus vaccines. The University gets more money if more vaccines are sold. The University of Pennsylvania also gets “milestone payments” when the Biden administration’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves a Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which represents a massive conflict of interest for Biden. .... NATIONAL FILE’s source explained to us that “UPenn earns massive payments (actual terms confidential, likely in the billions)” from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. .......
 
 
EXPOSED: Facebook’s Independent COVID Fact-checker Site FactCheck.org Funded By $1.9 Billion Vaccine Lobby
 
10/15/2021 11:06:38 PM PDT · by ransomnote · 25 replies
greatgameindia.com ^ | April 28, 2021 | greatgameindia.com
ransomnote: You'd think everyone would know by now that 'fact checkers' are owned and operated by the Big Tech censors and their allies. But still, I sometimes get some posting 'Factcheck.org' to me as if I will collapse in shame for posting something that corrupt organization doesn't approve of. A so-called independent fact-checker website FactCheck.org is exposed to be funded by the same $1.9 billion vaccine lobby group that it is supposed to check. The site is a Facebook partner whose articles are used to censor critical voices on the social media platform. It is headed by the former CDC...
 
 
FactCheck.org’s COVID-19 Project is Funded by Foundation That Has 15 Percent of Its Assets in Johnson and Johnson Stock
 
04/24/2021 8:42:56 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 12 replies
Big League Politics ^ | 04/24/2021 | Evan James
A FactCheck.org project addressing common COVID-19 “misconceptions” owes its existence to a philanthropic organization that has around 15 percent of its assets tied up in Johnson & Johnson stock. The top of the project homepage reads as follows: “SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project is made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.” Interestingly enough, Rep. Thomas Massie (KY-04) has discovered that 15.9 percent of the foundation’s assets consist of Johnson & Johnson common stock. Out of $11.9 million in assets, nearly $1.9 million has been invested...
 

 


33 posted on 03/29/2024 1:14:16 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
This is really not a good thing.

Given that the DNA fragments can be very different, there is a strong likelihood that different fragments of varying DNA sequence can be incorporated into a persons DNA so not only is a person's DNA altered, it is altered in such a way no two strands of that individual person's DNA are the same.

This is bad for an adult, but it could be much worse for a developing fetus, a baby or a child. And we used to worry about the mutagenic effects of nuclear war - this could potentially be as bad or even worse.

34 posted on 03/29/2024 1:14:55 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“FactCheck.org is a smear tool used by the medical regime and other Deep Stater efforts.”

I noticed that you agreed with them. Thanks


35 posted on 03/29/2024 1:16:15 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

“there is a strong likelihood that different fragments of varying DNA sequence can be incorporated into a persons DNA “

Since no person with a medical background has stated this I say you are making it up.


36 posted on 03/29/2024 1:18:27 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
r. Phillip Buckhault:

I would gladly take mRNA vaccine without DNA strands.

Even knowing about the DNA contamination I would recommend it to my parents.

Pfizer vaccine kept people out of the cemetery.

In our lifetime we will see mRNA vaccines curing cancers.


This is all good and well. But will it all come soon enough to help those that the mRNA vaccines is causing cancer

37 posted on 03/29/2024 1:18:45 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
At the VA yesterday my assigned nurse and I hit it off well while awaiting some test results due back momentarily as small talk ensued. I asked her opinion of the latest COVID-19 vaccine.

In a lowered voice she said she's not taking it even if it costs her her job.

The cat's definitely out of the bag now, and that's a great thing.

38 posted on 03/29/2024 1:19:24 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (We can never stop failing for the minute we do, we fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

“it is altered in such a way no two strands of that individual person’s DNA are the same.”

Obviously you have never stayed at a Holiday Inn!


39 posted on 03/29/2024 1:19:48 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/10/scicheck-covid-19-vaccines-have-not-been-shown-to-alter-dna-cause-cancer/

Your source is propaganda - I just posted to that effect here.

The medical regime will not test for alteration of DNA so they can say it has not been shown to alter DNA.

 


40 posted on 03/29/2024 1:19:53 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson