Here we go again.
How about AK-47s? 😁
OK so they don’t like the designation AR-15! Change the designation to SPD-1 (1st Self Protection Device). Problem solved.....
The 2nd amendment enshrines the right of citizens to own ANY weapon that the police have.
If a SWAT team can carry AR-15’s then so can I. It is my GOD GIVEN RIGHT!
During the 1700’s, the Continental Army carried musket guns that were ALSO available to citizens. A farmer had the SAME firepower as the soldier, and hereby citizens members of the unorganized militia, to this day.
appointees or (s)elected? Guessing appointees. Guess joemenita was right huh? Bill of Rights items aren’t absolute. Anybody for abridging, oh, say the 13th or 19th amendments? After all, they aren’t absolute......... fjb
That’s absurd. It’s only the design that they’re looking at. It’s a regular gun...
At some point some hapless soul is going to be ordered to come and police these firearms up. I wouldn’t want to be any of those people.
Judges gotta learn. We are tired of their activist nonsense. There will be a spark one day…
These idiots need to show us where it says in the Bill of Rights that AR-15s are not protected by the Second Amendment. It isn’t in there. These boneheads need to stay in their lane.
bttt
The military are using drones now, so by liberal logic, civilians aren’t allowed to have them because they are “weapons of war” (and civilian drones are shaped “just like military weapons of war drones, therefore civlian drones must be weap9ns of war” (even thouhg they aren’t equipped with the capabilities and munitions to take out people like military drones are.)
Liberals can twist logic so severely that folks are left scratching their heads wondering what in the heck they are talking about.
Civilian ar-15’s are not capable of full automatic. An “assault weapon” used by military are capable of dual or triple fire modes, one being full automatic. That is the definiti9n of assault rifle.
as·sault ri·fle
noun
1. a rapid-fire, magazine-fed automatic rifle designed for infantry use.
Pulled that decision right out of their collective asses, eh?
Diane Wood is a Rapin Bill Clinton stooge.
Michael Brennan was the only one who stood up for the Rule of Law, instead of the Rule of DNC Stooge. He is, of course, a Trump judge. The confirmation vote for Brennan in the US Senate was 49 to 46.
With judges this capable of this sort of twisted thinking there can be no law , period. There is no Reason in this decision. It flys in the face of of the very letter of the law.
Semi-auto rifles have been around since 1903. That is 120 years. Winchester 1903 and Remington model 8.
If the AR-15 is good enough for Miss America 1962 to shoot it is good enough for us today.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/06/07/blast-from-the-past-miss-america-shooting-a-cutting-edge-rifle/
Sturm
(lit, fig) storm
in Sturm und Regen in wind and rain
das Barometer steht auf Sturm (lit) the barometer is indicating stormy weather; (fig) there’s a storm brewing
sturm collinsdictionary.com
gewehr
(= Flinte) rifle; (= Schrotbüchse) shotgun
Gewehr ab! (Mil) order arms!
das Gewehr über! (Mil) shoulder arms!
gewehr collinsdictionary.com
StG 44 (Sturmgewehr 44)
When the framers wrote the 1A, they spoke of the “press” and of “speech.” Being learned men, they clearly meant to limit those freedoms to specifically newspaper and leaflets, and speech would have been only those things said within earshot. All other developments regarding the 1A were clearly not to be included, utilizing current 2A activist jurist interpretation.
“The three-judge panel in Barnett v. Raoul (Case No. 23-13530 consisted of a Reagan appointee, a Clinton appointee, and a Trump appointee. Only the latter supported the trial court.”
Who is the moron that was Reagan’s F’up? Nice system where two idiots can make such drastic decisions.