Posted on 10/25/2023 1:41:00 PM PDT by grundle
I had a dog and his name was BINGO.
I have even heard more than one story of men having to pay child support simply because each had been named as the father on a birth certificate, even though they had never acknowledged paternity and paternity testing showed that they were not the fathers of the children in question.
Perhaps those stories were not true, but I wouldn’t put anything past the courts.
i think a paternity test needs to be performed on every baby. In this day and age
Because women NEVER lie. And of course they NEVER cheat.
If he was married he would probably get hamstrung for child support even though it's not even his child. Is this a great country or what.
you old fuddy duddy :)
Was this letter written by a dad? Sounded like a woman wrote it.
“...petition the court to remove his name as the child’s father to avoid support payments.”
In this day and age, a judge may...or may not...be persuaded by that. Haven’t we seen stories RE a judge forcing the non-father to make child support payments?
“Sorry, son. Your wife may’ve been rabbiting around on you during your marriage. And DNA shows the child is not yours. But, it looks like you’re the one left holding the bag, so... I rule for the ex-wife.”
Is his name on the birth certificate?
If the woman doesn’t have any money no lawyer will even take the case. He’s looking at paying the bills for hours and court fees only to end up with a judgement that will never be collected, if a lawyer will take it.
What he should be worried about is being stuck with the childcare and alimony payments for a kid that isn’t his. That does happen. He’ll need a lawyer no matter what he does.
Just chalk it up as a life lesson
“Helicopter mom if there ever was one…”
CH-53k or a Chinook. We are talking heavy lift.
If the young man’s name made it onto the birth certificate he’s screwed. He would have to petition in court to get his name off and many times the judge will say no, since the “father” already accepted responsibility.
Ok, that made me chuckle. Well done.
Thanks. I was like- Something is missing here. Read it multiple times and could not figure out how we got to the last paragraph.
The son may not be the baby’s father, but due to his close relationship with the mother, he’s going to get screwed with baby payments.
And I think that is completely wrong. Some families do prenups some don’t. It’s choice just like paternity tests. If you want one take the heat don’t hide behind making everyone else get one. I want the Government out of my life not the nanny state dotting the i’s & crossing the t’s.
In most states, if his name is on the birth certificate he only has a certain amount of time to challenge paternity and get his name removed, usually about a year. After that point, he is on the hook for support, even though he can prove the child is not his. Just having the DNA test in hand is not enough, he has to get a court to remove him as parent.
Anger understood. But, drop it. Cut all ties and never think about this woman again.
BTW, tell your son this is an object lesson and to keep his drawers pulled up always until marriage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.